PDA

View Full Version : I still think the Texas OT td was incomplete, BUT


Thick
10-25-2025, 07:57 PM
Why are we running a hurry up offense when we?re up 17? We should have been snapping the ball with 2 seconds on the clock every play. You can?t defend that time/game management. The clock is your friend, and NEVER return kickoffs. Take the ball at the 25.
BulldogBear
10-25-2025, 07:59 PM
Agreed, but it wouldn't have mattered. We were DONE offensively. Had been for 12m. We had to win with 38 and there was just too much time left.
chef dixon
10-25-2025, 08:01 PM
Maybe I'm blind but on review it looks like a clear touchdown
Statecoachingblows**
10-25-2025, 08:03 PM
Texas should be thankful we knocked out Arch.
BulldogBear
10-25-2025, 08:04 PM
Maybe I'm blind but on review it looks like a clear touchdown

I would say it was clear his foot was down in bounds and he did hang onto the football. What we're saying is that it was not clear that he had control of the ball yet while the foot was down. I don't think he did or at least there was not enough evidence to overturn.
Coursesuper
10-25-2025, 08:04 PM
Why are we running a hurry up offense when we?re up 17? We should have been snapping the ball with 2 seconds on the clock every play. You can?t defend that time/game management. The clock is your friend, and NEVER return kickoffs. Take the ball at the 25.

Nope there was a lot of bad out there in the 4th quarter, plenty to go around.
Charlie_Sheen420
10-25-2025, 08:06 PM
Lebby and this team are a bunch of losers until they can prove otherwise
Bothrops
10-25-2025, 08:13 PM
It wasn't incomplete.
maroonmania
10-25-2025, 08:36 PM
All the replay proved was that the ball did make contact with the fingers just before the foot came up. But in no way did it prove the catch was made before the foot came up. Looked like it was pretty clear that possession wasn't gained until after the foot came up.
Tbonewannabe
10-25-2025, 08:50 PM
All the replay proved was that the ball did make contact with the fingers just before the foot came up. But in no way did it prove the catch was made before the foot came up. Looked like it was pretty clear that possession wasn't gained until after the foot came up.

Yeah, I have never seen a catch ruled the 2nd it touched someone's hands. By the time he secured it his foot was out of bounds. There was nothing there to overturn the call.