Kentucky vacate wins, will this get Leach in the HOF

[TheLostDawg]

https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/kentucky-will-vacate-wins-as-ncaa-investigation-finds-football-players-received-impermissible-benefits/

If they played on 2022, wouldn't that one win get him to the 500 mark?

Either way I think that he should get it because we had to play an sec only schedule in 2020, that should have given him wiggle room that he wasn't afforded

[MagicDawg]

Unlike a forfeit, I don't think the vacated win changes the loss on the other team.

However, people in positions of influence should approach Kentucky about the possibility of forfeiting a single game against Leach. That *would* change the results for Leach and possibly push him over the limit, and if they're vacating the win anyway... maybe a nice way to get something good out of it.

[Coach34]

Vacating doesn’t give The Pirate a win unfortunately. But to me it should negate a loss. His family should sue on that

[BigDawg81]

Doesn?t change anything for Leach?s record

[MagicDawg]

If Kentucky chose to *forfeit* that single game instead of vacating it, we might be having a different conversation. I think this should be explored.

[Quaoarsking]

Sooner or later the HOF is going to change its mind. Leach is too popular for him to stay out forever.

[viverlibre]

The horribly officiated Memphis game shouldn't sound against him either.

[RockyDog]

The horribly officiated Memphis game shouldn't sound against him either.

Why? Noodle had every chance to win that game and he noodled it

[dawgman]

https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/kentucky-will-vacate-wins-as-ncaa-investigation-finds-football-players-received-impermissible-benefits/

If they played on 2022, wouldn't that one win get him to the 500 mark?

Either way I think that he should get it because we had to play an sec only schedule in 2020, that should have given him wiggle room that he wasn't afforded



if the game was treated as if t was not played. this would remove a loss on the pirate's record. with the loss removed and the % being less than 1% it would still get to the required %?