-
My only concern with the new offensive staff is they're about to see some defenses like they've never seen. At least not from a week to week perspective. The speed and size in the SEC is the best in the country. The coaching is improving now too. They'll have to be ready to adjust some things.
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
I'm a fitz fan but I don't agree with this. He's shown no sign of being an above average passer. He has above average arm strength but throws off his back foot consistently, which leads to him airmailing the ball consistently. Additionally, he throws a heavy, hard pass.
While, I'm a fan, for him to take the next step as a passer, he needs to transform himself from the football equivalent of a 98 mph reliever with control issues to a a starting pitcher with touch, feel, and command.
I don?t think anyone can argue with this. Fitz is a great bulldog and hell of an athlete but an above average passer he is not.
-
Originally Posted by
GreenheadDawg
I don?t think anyone can argue with this. Fitz is a great bulldog and hell of an athlete but an above average passer he is not.
I’ll be very surprised if Fitz isn’t a 60-65% passer this year.
-
From watching a video or two on Jomo ?s passing philosophy, it seems like it will be more successful than Mullen?s. A lot of Mullen?s seemed to me it was ?beat your guy with your route and get open?. That works OK if you?re loaded with 5* studs at receiver. We didn?t and therefore never got separation. Jomo?s seems to create separation by design. Attack an area an make defenders make choices. Take the open choice. If they choose foolishly, burn them for a td. Assuming Fitz can read the open choices, I think his completion percentage will go up significantly.
-
One of my question marks is Bob Shoop. What happened at TN? Obviously, Moorhead felt those were extenuating circumstances and trusts him. But that’s still a worry for me.
-
Originally Posted by
Ifyouonlyknew
I’ll be very surprised if Fitz isn’t a 60-65% passer this year.
If he is, then watch the 17 out for Mississippi State. Playoff contender.
-
Originally Posted by
NWADAWG
From watching a video or two on Jomo ?s passing philosophy, it seems like it will be more successful than Mullen?s. A lot of Mullen?s seemed to me it was ?beat your guy with your route and get open?. That works OK if you?re loaded with 5* studs at receiver. We didn?t and therefore never got separation. Jomo?s seems to create separation by design. Attack an area an make defenders make choices. Take the open choice. If they choose foolishly, burn them for a td. Assuming Fitz can read the open choices, I think his completion percentage will go up significantly.
JoMo's offense is the next generation of the Meyer/Mullen scheme.
It's better at blending the unique run concepts with a legit passing game.
-
Turnovers are fairly random events in general. Joe's offense will also have a lot of higher percentage shorter pass routes and RPO's which will limit turnovers some and forcing defenders to cover everything limits turnovers IMO.
We finished -1 in turnover margin last year FWIW.
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
Turnovers are fairly random events in general. Joe's offense will also have a lot of higher percentage shorter pass routes and RPO's which will limit turnovers some and forcing defenders to cover everything limits turnovers IMO.
We finished -1 in turnover margin last year FWIW.
I would argue that we have had too few turnovers in the past few years.
I know that sounds ridiculous, but I'm ok with some turnovers so long as they don't exceed the "risk/reward" matrix.
It's the problem with Alex Smith as an NFL QB. He rarely turns the ball over but he's so risk averse that he doesn't really make plays either.
If MSU wants to win more big games, we've got to take more risk & shorten drives. If are looking for the number 1 reason that Mullen didn't win big games, that is the reason
-
Originally Posted by
Dawg2003
One of my question marks is Bob Shoop. What happened at TN? Obviously, Moorhead felt those were extenuating circumstances and trusts him. But that’s still a worry for me.
Shoop was micromanaged by Butch. Butch let the defensive players treat Shoop like he was a water boy. Butch did not have Shoop's back on player issues. This is what I've read on UT boards and heard from one of the ESPN guys that was on Bo's show a couple of months ago. Remember, the team pretty much quit on Pruitt during their spring game - the effing SPRING GAME! They have way deeper problems than Shoop.
-
Originally Posted by
TrapGame
Shoop was micromanaged by Butch. Butch let the defensive players treat Shoop like he was a water boy. Butch did not have Shoop's back on player issues. This is what I've read on UT boards and heard from one of the ESPN guys that was on Bo's show a couple of months ago. Remember, the team pretty much quit on Pruitt during their spring game - the effing SPRING GAME! They have way deeper problems than Shoop.
Wait - UT quit on their new coach during the Spring Game?? What is this story? I'd not heard that anywhere.
Last edited by BrunswickDawg; 07-12-2018 at 11:04 AM.
"After dealing with Ole Miss for over a year," he said, "I've learned to expect their leadership to do and say things that the leadership at other Division I schools would never consider doing and to justify their actions by reminding themselves that "We're Ole Miss.""
- Tom Mars, Esq. 4.9.18
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
I'm a fitz fan but I don't agree with this. He's shown no sign of being an above average passer. He has above average arm strength but throws off his back foot consistently, which leads to him airmailing the ball consistently. Additionally, he throws a heavy, hard pass.
While, I'm a fan, for him to take the next step as a passer, he needs to transform himself from the football equivalent of a 98 mph reliever with control issues to a a starting pitcher with touch, feel, and command.
It's not easy to run the ball 25 times a game, going toe to toe with linebackers and then getting back up and seconds later trying to throw an accurate pass. Moorhead doesn't plan to use Fitz as a battering ram quite as much, so that alone should help him with his accuracy.
-
Originally Posted by
BrunswickDawg
Wait - UT quit on their new coach during the Spring Game?? What is this story? I'd not heard that anywhere.
Yep, I was watching it when it happened. Pruitt was PISSED! Half the team just gave up, ready to wrap it up and go home. It was like watching two five year olds wrestle the second half.
-
Originally Posted by
Matty Dispatch
It's not easy to run the ball 25 times a game, going toe to toe with linebackers and then getting back up and seconds later trying to throw an accurate pass. Moorhead doesn't plan to use Fitz as a battering ram quite as much, so that alone should help him with his accuracy.
Not disagreeing, but I think you're kind of making an excuse that only encapsulates about 5% of Nick's issues. So between short WRs and running's a lot, we've got somewhere around 45% of his issues solved. 45% is a lot though and could certianly make him more effective.
-
I believe also that our wide receivers haven't been able to separate from defenders much so it makes passing accuracy a little harder. Lot of pressure with a QB seeing his receivers covered like a blanket versus a wide open receiver. Big difference in most cases.
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
Not disagreeing, but I think you're kind of making an excuse that only encapsulates about 5% of Nick's issues. So between short WRs and running's a lot, we've got somewhere around 45% of his issues solved. 45% is a lot though and could certianly make him more effective.
I think it's a lot more than 5%. He pukes on the sideline every game, his arms are beat red from the abuse. Imagine running full speed into a brick wall, then get up call the play and try to hitting a moving target 15 yards downfield that's being covered by a defender. It's one thing to be a running QB who is trying to pick up a 1st down on 3rd & 3, it's another when you're the home run threat and trying to break one to the endzone every time. That's part of his game, and inaccuracy is a side effect. If you turn him into Tyler Russell it's really hard to imagine he's not a lot more accurate. But I'll deal with some wild throws because he's such a great athlete who can make so many more plays with his legs.
-
Senior Member
What everybody is glossing over is just how bad our secondary was last year despite having a very good pass rush! In the 4 games we lost, we were absolutely torched by our opponents, with Bama and Ole Miss both merely playing pitch and catch against our overmatched secondary. Our cb’s are again mediocre at best and our safeties get caught out of position far too often so while I am also feeling “wooly” about this season, the truth is our secondary will again cost us a couple of games again this year, if not more
-
Senior Member
I agree...
We should be a run first team with what we have coming back. It would be a shame to start throwing it all over the place just for the sake of throwing the football more. Having a solid running game will also give Coach Moorehead time to see and adjust to SEC defenses. We have to keep in mind he has yet to coach a down in the SEC.
-
Originally Posted by
biggun
What everybody is glossing over is just how bad our secondary was last year despite having a very good pass rush! In the 4 games we lost, we were absolutely torched by our opponents, with Bama and Ole Miss both merely playing pitch and catch against our overmatched secondary. Our cb’s are again mediocre at best and our safeties get caught out of position far too often so while I am also feeling “wooly” about this season, the truth is our secondary will again cost us a couple of games again this year, if not more
Great point.
I would argue though, which teams on our schedule actually can pitch it and catch it well enough to exploit that?
Auburn
Bama
Ole Miss.
I don't any other team on our schedule that
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
Great point.
I would argue though, which teams on our schedule actually can pitch it and catch it well enough to exploit that?
Auburn
Bama
Ole Miss.
I don't any other team on our schedule that
Yep, don’t have to play Georgia, thank goodness, but the other 3 will have just as good passing attacks this year or maybe even better (Bama). However, I imagine Mullin will have Florida throwing early and often in Starkville and despite many bashing his play calling and his recruiting, he is excellent at exposing opponents weaknesses and our glaring and obvious shortcoming is our secondary which he will attack early and often.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.