-
UM fan files to protect name?
Things are getting a bit more interesting...
Tweet Link
-
Any legal ground to stand on? Where you at Johnson and boom?
-
Don't think that will walk....WHY
IHL has NOTHING to do with the ATH. Department? ATH. departments are stand alone.... WHY are they petitioning IHL and not the Ethics Commission?
-
Originally Posted by
SailingDawg
Things are getting a bit more interesting...
Tweet Link
Any idea who the attorney is that filed this? I do not tweet.....
WAIT a minute.... HOW does this person KNOW his name is in the NOA???? Why was this filed in Jackson, MS. The crimes were committed in Oxfart.... Unless this person LIVES in Jackson......
Last edited by Mimi's Babies; 05-26-2017 at 11:01 PM.
-
Originally Posted by
SailingDawg
Things are getting a bit more interesting...
Tweet Link
He's deleted his acct.
-
Originally Posted by
starkvegasdawg34
He's deleted his acct.
Normally this is NOT what a lawsuit looks like...
Their should be a case number, filing date etc. on the filings... With a received seal attached. There are TWO different fonts their also. If that was sent to the court here it would NOT be excepted. Is this just another OM ploy????
I sent this to a 'friend' of mine... I will what he has to say.....
Check you private messages...
Last edited by Mimi's Babies; 05-26-2017 at 11:17 PM.
Reason: Anything anyone can do to STOP the TRUTH from coming out at OM.
-
No way this is real. Not that I don't think some of these twits will try this tactic, but this looks rather...not legit?
-
Starkvegasdawg34 -- check you private messages....
-
Senior Member
It wouldn't surprise me. This is a legit way to potentially suppress one's name from being disclosed. However, in my not so learned opinion, the plaintiff would have a high bar to jump over to have a court rule that there is some sort of irreparable harm to them to justify a court enforced injunction on a clearly public government document. I will rely on the lawyers here to further opine.
-
Originally Posted by
Chip
It wouldn't surprise me. This is a legit way to potentially suppress one's name from being disclosed. However, in my not so learned opinion, the plaintiff would have a high bar to jump over to have a court rule that there is some sort of irreparable harm to them to justify a court enforced injunction on a clearly public government document. I will rely on the lawyers here to further opine.
located the attorney's firm that tweeted this...
Chip -- check your private messages....
Last edited by Mimi's Babies; 05-26-2017 at 11:13 PM.
-
This thing gets infinitely more entertaining if UNM 'badass' boosters begin panicking and pointing fingers. I have always waited without holding my breath to see one or two well-placed Bears break ranks with the party line.
In the words of Flounder in Animal House - "Oh boy, is this great!"
-
If his name is in the public records requested, then he is pretty much out of luck. There are some legal loopholes I guess, but removing his name should not be an option, and should not fly in reference to the public records release. I guess that's what this tweet was in reference to as it says it no longer exists.
-
Originally Posted by
yjnkdawg
If his name is in the public records requested, then he is pretty much out of luck. There are some legal loopholes I guess, but removing his name should not be an option, and should not fly in reference to the public records release. I guess that's what this tweet was in reference to as it says it no longer exists.
Check your private messages...
-
Originally Posted by
Chip
It wouldn't surprise me. This is a legit way to potentially suppress one's name from being disclosed. However, in my not so learned opinion, the plaintiff would have a high bar to jump over to have a court rule that there is some sort of irreparable harm to them to justify a court enforced injunction on a clearly public government document. I will rely on the lawyers here to further opine.
There is no justification here. Just somebody grasping for straws that they can't get. If his name is in the said requested documents then he should have played by the rules and then he wouldn't have to worry about getting legal counsel. If irreparable harm is determined here then whoever issued a court injunction should be investigated.
-
Originally Posted by
msstate7
Any legal ground to stand on? Where you at Johnson and boom?
I think they are just spitting in the wind on this and the spit is going to be blown right back in their face.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
yjnkdawg
There is no justification here. Just somebody grasping for straws that they can't get. If his name is in the said requested documents then he should have played by the rules and then he wouldn't have to worry about getting legal counsel. If irreparable harm is determined here then whoever issued a court injunction should be investigated.
I figure it is someone just trying to exhaust their legal options, hoping for a favorable ruling
-
Originally Posted by
Chip
I figure it is someone just trying to exhaust their legal options, hoping for a favorable ruling
IF this person/persons were NOT doing things that are illegal then they WOULD NOT have anything to worry about.. Do what is RIGHT in front of GOD and Man -- then you don't have to worry.....
-
Originally Posted by
Mimi's Babies
IF this person/persons were NOT doing things that are illegal then they WOULD NOT have anything to worry about.. Do what is RIGHT in front of GOD and Man -- then you don't have to worry.....
Exactly Mimi....... This person just happens to be one of the stars in this NCAA non-fiction Novel. I guess he is getting stage fright now. I sent you a pm response, but I don't think it went through.
-
Okay, total speculation. Given the UNM propensity to be posers and phony big shots, do you suppose, just maybe, that some of these shitbirds spent money they shouldn't have? I mean from a family pot of gold, business partnership? Nothing illegal in terms of criminal wrongdoing, but a use of money they don't want to account for. Say to a wife? Parent? Firm?
-
Originally Posted by
Dawgowar
Okay, total speculation. Given the UNM propensity to be posers and phony big shots, do you suppose, just maybe, that some of these shitbirds spent money they shouldn't have? I mean from a family pot of gold, business partnership? Nothing illegal in terms of criminal wrongdoing, but a use of money they don't want to account for. Say to a wife? Parent? Firm?
I think it is to do more with the OM Athletic Programs (Specifically Football) and his involvement in such, than some type account you mentioned, but you may have something there too.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.