Leave Q on the bench

[Covercorner2]

he only had 4 steals- which is still good

How about my posts?

[Coach34]

The guy blew by Q like he wasn’t even there. He could have done a much better job of making sure he got a foul call. What he did was awful and damn near cost us the game. Especially after his turnover up 4 with 25 seconds left

[Liverpooldawg]

The guy blew by Q like he wasn’t even there. He could have done a much better job of making sure he got a foul call. What he did was awful and damn near cost us the game. Especially after his turnover up 4 with 25 seconds left

Exactly.

[stalkingpoon]

Not the first time he's given up a big 3 like that at the end of the game. If he switches to Vandy's guy at the buzzer he probably misses that game winner. Then we aren't forcing ourselves to win out like we are now.

[Covercorner2]

The guy blew by Q like he wasn?t even there. He could have done a much better job of making sure he got a foul call. What he did was awful and damn near cost us the game. Especially after his turnover up 4 with 25 seconds left

You can't say with a straight face that you haven't seen that called a foul ALOT. Come on, man. Even your boy Liverpool said he grabbed him? What else did you want him to do? Give him a reach- around? aKA risk am intentional foul?

He did was he was supposed to do. And, guess what? We won. If he did more, we risk losing and this board imploding.

[stalkingpoon]

You can't say with a straight face that you haven't seen that called a foul ALOT. Come on, man. Even your boy Liverpool said he grabbed him? What else did you want him to do? Give him a reach- around? aKA risk in intentional foul?

Put a body on him. Don't give him a free lane to the 3pt lane.

[Coach34]

Put a body on him. Don't give him a free lane to the 3pt lane.

This

[Covercorner2]

Put a body on him. Don't give him a free lane to the 3pt lane.

So risk an intentional foul? Got it.

Tell me the last time you saw a guy hockey check someone in that scenario. I'll wait...

Especially 30 feet from the basket. You think he got "blew by?" Trying to set your feet a take charge in that scenario would have been even worse.

[stalkingpoon]

Hockey check? No. Step in front of him, don't let him run past you and grab his hips. It's called a blocking foul. Not uncommon. I really don't see how anyone thinks that is good defense. The refs weren't gonna call that hand checking stuff at the end with us up by 3.

[Jarius]

Had he done the same thing from in FRONT of the offensive player, the call would have been made. He was lazy and it damn near cost us the game.

Ok, well the announcers and the guys on the sec network hat have forgotten more about basketball than you or I will ever know disagree.

[Liverpooldawg]

Put a body on him. Don't give him a free lane to the 3pt lane.

Exactly.

[Covercorner2]

Hockey check? No. Step in front of him, don't let him run past you and grab his hips. It's called a blocking foul. Not uncommon. I really don't see how anyone thinks that is good defense. The refs weren't gonna call that hand checking stuff at the end with us up by 3.

Lmao. A for effort. So, instead of getting "blown by," you wanted him to take a charge 30 feet out? You can't be serious.

Yes, "hand checks" are called fouls when down under a minute the majority of the time. You have all night to watch other games and see.

[Liverpooldawg]

Ok, well the announcers and the guys on the sec network hat have forgotten more about basketball than you or I will ever know disagree.

Did it get called, and not called intentional? If so then it was a good play. If not he screwed up.

[Liverpooldawg]

Lmao. A for effort. So, instead of getting "blown by," you wanted him to take a charge 30 feet out? You can't be serious.

In that situation that is eactly what you want him to do. If he had its game over we win. Jeez man, you can't be THAT...... well.

[stalkingpoon]

He wasn't blown by. He just failed to guard him. He reached for him when he went by. And no not a charge, just saying stepping in front of the ball handler isn't going to get you an intentional foul. Don't get so hurt. We aren't saying he's a terrible player. It is just that his defense almost lost us another critical game.

[Covercorner2]

Did it get called, and not called intentional? If so then it was a good play. If not he screwed up.

It was a mistake from the refs. It happens. And most of the time we understand. Unless you have other motives or are just clueless or both.

[Covercorner2]

In that situation that is eactly what you want him to do. If he had its game over we win. Jeez man, you can't be THAT...... well.

OK, man you're right. It's takes a charge to send a guy to the line. You're right.

[Bulldog1]

If he stayed in front of him, it’s a common blocking foul- not intentional.

[Covercorner2]

If he stayed in front of him, it’s a common blocking foul- not intentional.

So you have to "stay in front of him" to send a guy to the line late? I must be watching a different game.

[Liverpooldawg]

It was a mistake from the refs. It happens. And most of the time we understand. Unless you have other motives or are just clueless or both.

Get in front of him and th ref doesn't matter as much