-
Originally Posted by
Dawg-gone-dawgs
I hate to say it but they would beat us by 20. Their size would be too much to overcome. Add on to that an incentive to beat us to get revenge.
Their size was good last year and they didn't. You people quit and give up so easily. We'd play them head up in a damn good game. You just have to punch them in the mouth like last year. They're going to essentially play the whole tournament at home and we'll get shipped out way west in the rigged NCAA system. Let them cruise and not have to play any tough games. It'll catch up to them.
-
Originally Posted by
Dawg-gone-dawgs
I hate to say it but they would beat us by 20. Their size would be too much to overcome. Add on to that an incentive to beat us to get revenge.
I have watch our girls and they play to the level of the team they are playing. I think they would step up. I suspect UCONN is hoping for a rematch.
-
Originally Posted by
Cooterpoot
Their size was good last year and they didn't. You people quit and give up so easily. We'd play them head up in a damn good game. You just have to punch them in the mouth like last year. They're going to essentially play the whole tournament at home and we'll get shipped out way west in the rigged NCAA system. Let them cruise and not have to play any tough games. It'll catch up to them.
We also had more size....If McCowan happens to get in foul trouble, were done.
-
Here ya go: If this don't get ya fired up nothing will! Except we would not be near the under dog as the US Hockey team.
-
Originally Posted by
Commercecomet24
Here ya go: If this don't get ya fired up nothing will! Except we would not be near the under dog as the US Hockey team.
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Commercecomet24 again.
I absolutely love that movie and I am not a big hockey fan.
-
Originally Posted by
Commercecomet24
Here ya go: If this don't get ya fired up nothing will! Except we would not be near the under dog as the US Hockey team.
So did that coach escape from New York and LA to make that speech.
-
Originally Posted by
Jack Lambert
I have watch our girls and they play to the level of the team they are playing. I think they would step up. I suspect UCONN is hoping for a rematch.
UConn has great ball movement and almost everyone of them can hit a three. They are a great team but our defense makes other teams very uncomfortable. Last year we would have won by double digits if the refs weren't screwing us every chance they got, insert Porn Star Katie clip of the throat punch.
-
We had more depth last year than we do this year. We arent as good defensively as were last year. But we are better offensively.
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
The best way to beat them is play a game in the 60s. Slow it down, be physical, limit their possessions, no second chance points.
Let them run and play like golden state and we?ll get beat 90-70.
-
Only way to top last year's win over UConn is to do it this year to win the title.
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
We had more depth last year than we do this year. We arent as good defensively as were last year. But we are better offensively.
Depth is ok everywhere but the 5. Holmes would start for 80% of teams and can score and defend, danberry is a plus defender who can score some, bibby can be physical and give you 5 fouls. Her lack of quickness is an issue if she has to guard the perimeter. She is better guarding someone the style of asa Wilson.
Just missing a solid backup 5.
-
Originally Posted by
Tbonewannabe
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Commercecomet24 again.
I absolutely love that movie and I am not a big hockey fan.
Same here. That may be the only hockey game i've watched in my whole life. That movie and the whole story of that team was just incredible. The whole is greater than the sum of the parts. One of those deals that transcends sport, triumph of the human spirit type stuff. Gotta love it!
-
Louisville beats them last night if they don't start so slow. They just got intimidated by UConn to start the game, similar to SC but they outscored UConn 2 of the final 3 periods and were only 2 behind them in scoring in the other period. You just can't let UConn jump on you early.
-
Originally Posted by
Tbonewannabe
UConn has great ball movement and almost everyone of them can hit a three. They are a great team but our defense makes other teams very uncomfortable. Last year we would have won by double digits if the refs weren't screwing us every chance they got, insert Porn Star Katie clip of the throat punch.
Where'd the "Porn Star Katie" moniker come from? I've heard it before but not sure it fits ... she's OK, just doing her job. She did it very well with the throat punch. She could play for us after a little practice. **
-
Originally Posted by
Cooterpoot
Louisville beats them last night if they don't start so slow. They just got intimidated by UConn to start the game, similar to SC but they outscored UConn 2 of the final 3 periods and were only 2 behind them in scoring in the other period. You just can't let UConn jump on you early.
Louisville doesn't beat them regardless. Having said that, I think we may could do the same to Louisville if we play our best.
I'm just saying they have extremely tough matchups for us, especially Katie Lou. Everyone with exception of TM and Morgan will be giving up 2, 4, and 4 inches. TM will have to fly down the court too, which isn't her strong suit.
They have 3 players shooting > 40% from 3, and 2 > 45%.
I do think we may have advantage in physicality tho. Not saying we can't win, but they have most of the advantages IMO. Anyone that thinks we gonna just put a beat down on them is living in fantasy land.
-
Looking at uconn stats, they only play 7 routinely. Those 7 play 16 minutes or more. Same as us. That?s not counting danberry who is at 10 minutes a game.
They shoot 40% from three compared to our 39.
They shoot 53% overall compared to our 47.
They shoot 76% from the stripe compared to our 73.
They give up 54 points a game compared to our 55.
-
Originally Posted by
confucius say
Looking at uconn stats, they only play 7 routinely. Those 7 play 16 minutes or more. Same as us. That?s not counting danberry who is at 10 minutes a game.
They shoot 40% from three compared to our 39.
They shoot 53% overall compared to our 47.
They shoot 76% from the stripe compared to our 73.
They give up 54 points a game compared to our 55.
I looked at their stats too. Saw same rotation numbers as well as the length differentials. Their ability to hit 3s gonna spread us out a good bit.
-
Originally Posted by
dawgday166
Louisville doesn't beat them regardless. Having said that, I think we may could do the same to Louisville if we play our best.
I'm just saying they have extremely tough matchups for us, especially Katie Lou. Everyone with exception of TM and Morgan will be giving up 2, 4, and 4 inches. TM will have to fly down the court too, which isn't her strong suit.
They have 3 players shooting > 40% from 3, and 2 > 45%.
I do think we may have advantage in physicality tho. Not saying we can't win, but they have most of the advantages IMO. Anyone that thinks we gonna just put a beat down on them is living in fantasy land.
I don?t think anyone here thinks we gonna just put a beat down on them.
The question is how big is the gap from them to us and how to make that gap up. The easiest way is style of play. We have to dictate the style to beat them, just like we did last year.
-
Originally Posted by
dawgday166
I looked at their stats too. Saw same rotation numbers as well as the length differentials. Their ability to hit 3s gonna spread us out a good bit.
Yep. That?s why we cannot let them go all golden state. They love shooting threes in transition. We have to slow it down and force them to get their points off of offensive sets. And no second chance points.
-
Originally Posted by
confucius say
Looking at uconn stats, they only play 7 routinely. Those 7 play 16 minutes or more. Same as us. That?s not counting danberry who is at 10 minutes a game.
They shoot 40% from three compared to our 39.
They shoot 53% overall compared to our 47.
They shoot 76% from the stripe compared to our 73.
They give up 54 points a game compared to our 55.
Last year: 40% 3s, 52% shooting, 78% FT, gave up 55 (scored 87 now scoring 90)
Last year us: 34% 3s, 44% shooting, 73% FT, gave up 57 (scored 76 now scoring 83)
I don't see where much is different than last year except we've improved our numbers more than they have (while playing a tougher schedule). You guys carry on with your "Nobody can beat UConn" bullshit.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.