-
Om vs Monmouth NIT
Watching game on tv and baseball on iPad. Anyway, it's under 8 mins to go in the 2nd half and OM has 2 fouls and Monmouth has 1. If we had these refs, we might've gotten postseason.
-
New rule............
Fouls were reset at the half way point of the half.
-
Originally Posted by
West Tn Dawg
New rule............
Fouls were reset at the half way point of the half.
Ahhh... I knew it was weird to see that few fouls
-
Junior Member
-
Originally Posted by
Random Poster
what channel?
Espn2... rebs prob gonna win
-
I guess I don't understand the NIT structure. Why is a 5 seed playing a 4 seed in the first round?
-
Originally Posted by
RocketDawg
I guess I don't understand the NIT structure. Why is a 5 seed playing a 4 seed in the first round?
1v8
2v7
3v6
4v5
-
OK ... just 8 teams. Thanks.
Looks like the next game is Richmond vs Alabama. I thought Bama should've been an NCAA team.
-
Alabama has the worst looking basketball floor I've ever seen. It's painful to watch on television, and probably worse in person.
-
Originally Posted by
RocketDawg
Alabama has the worst looking basketball floor I've ever seen. It's painful to watch on television, and probably worse in person.
You've never seen Oregon's then
-
Originally Posted by
WeWonItAll(Most)
You've never seen Oregon's then
Don't think I have but it's easy to imagine, based on everything else they do.
Just looked it up ... finally figured out those are trees on the floor. Pretty bad.
-
So Johnson has taken NIT talent to the NIT and lost in the first round both times. Basically what Anthony Grant also did.
-
If you zone Alabama and stop them driving to the basket, you shut them down. That's exactly what Richmond did. It's idiotic to play man to man against them:
-
Originally Posted by
MarketingBully
If you zone Alabama and stop them driving to the basket, you shut them down. That's exactly what Richmond did. It's idiotic to play man to man against them:
The man-to-man versus zone argument is a precarious one. Man-to-man is what pro prospects need to play and the majority of them seek it out to better prepare themselves for the NBA. Very few teams with elite talent play zone because of this. However, a well executed zone D can really throw some teams off.
I think Howland stance on man-to-man is ok for us, as I'd rather recruit elite, NBA types.
-
Originally Posted by
missouridawg
The man-to-man versus zone argument is a precarious one. Man-to-man is what pro prospects need to play and the majority of them seek it out to better prepare themselves for the NBA. Very few teams with elite talent play zone because of this. However, a well executed zone D can really throw some teams off.
I think Howland stance on man-to-man is ok for us, as I'd rather recruit elite, NBA types.
While I agree with this I also think it is beneficial to mix in some zone every now and then. Throwing different looks at offenses can really mess with their rhythm. I'd like to see us do a half court trap and drop back into a 2-3 every once in a while. Or do a 2-3 and trap every time the ball goes to the corner.
-
Originally Posted by
missouridawg
The man-to-man versus zone argument is a precarious one. Man-to-man is what pro prospects need to play and the majority of them seek it out to better prepare themselves for the NBA. Very few teams with elite talent play zone because of this. However, a well executed zone D can really throw some teams off.
I think Howland stance on man-to-man is ok for us, as I'd rather recruit elite, NBA types.
Man to man is the hardest defense for freshmen to learn and everyone has to be on the same page with great communication on off ball and on ball switches along with when to double the post. As you saw this year, we struggled mightily with our man to man but could have benefited from playing zone against teams such as Alabama and South Carolina where their only chance of scoring is on the inside. Playing zone this past year could have gotten us a few more wins and made our fans at least feel better about ourselves.
-
Originally Posted by
RocketDawg
I guess I don't understand the NIT structure. Why is a 5 seed playing a 4 seed in the first round?
Originally Posted by
msstate7
1v8
2v7
3v6
4v5
Originally Posted by
RocketDawg
OK ... just 8 teams. Thanks.
Looks like the next game is Richmond vs Alabama. I thought Bama should've been an NCAA team.
No there's 4 brackets with 8 teams each in the tournament. 32 total teams.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.