-
01-19-2017, 11:29 AM
#101
Originally Posted by
Random Poster
Our history began in 1991 when we finally decided to operate like an SEC football program
We have been a team that could compete in the West except when ravaged by probation or the when we let Templeton actually make the hire. Thank goodness we didn't allow him to make other hires like Bobby Wallace and Dwayne Reboul
So, historically speaking, starting in 91 we could compete for the west as long as we weren't on probation(CHEATING) and the Croom Debacle. We have competed for the west exactly 3 times since 91... In the 90s the west was not nearly as strong as it is now. So in 25 years we have competed for the west 3 times and you consider that being a consistent competitor in the west? Jackie lost the program before sanctions ever hit. He basically had a good 3-4 year run in a down west. Other than that and 2014 when have we realistically competed for the west? Again in 25 years we have had a chance 3 times.
-
01-19-2017, 11:34 AM
#102
1990 5-6
1991 7-5
1992 7-5
1993 3-6
1994 8-4
1995 3-8
1996 5-6
1997 7-4
1998 8-5
1999 10-2
2000 8-4
2001 3-8
2002 3-9
2003 2-10
2004 3-8
2005 3-8
2006 3-9
2007 8-5
2008 4-8
Really competed for the west.....
-
01-19-2017, 11:35 AM
#103
Now Mullen's tenure
2009 5-7
2010 9-4
2011 7-6
2012 8-5
2013 7-6
2014 10-3
2015 9-4
2016 6-7
-
01-19-2017, 11:36 AM
#104
Junior Member
Originally Posted by
Quaoarsking
False. We have the best QB in the SEC and the 4th or 5th best head coach. We'll win at least 9 or 10 games.
You are smoking crack.
We have to replace 3 OL starters and 4/10 on the 2 deep. That's never turned out well for us.
We also lost 4 Sr's on the DL and that's going to cause problems also.
We are a 7 win team in 2017 at best- and less if Fitz gets hurt.
-
01-19-2017, 11:36 AM
#105
Originally Posted by
Jarius
You can only make so many facility upgrades with all of that money. At some point more money stops helping as much. The extra money that we are receiving is helping us much more than the schools getting extra money that have always had a lot of money
I disagree. It's not nearly the diminishing return that people think. If it was just one year, I would agree but over the last 5 years, depending on the school, we are as much as $400 MIL behind what they have brought in. Bama is to the point they are hoarding their new corrdinators and assistant coaches off the field until a spot opens. The auxiliary staff and student athlete support staff ratio is lower. The recruiting budget that the AD office gives the staff is millions behind other schools. What happens when our budget drops back down from the ramp up of the baseball stadium expansion? This amount of budget difference will be an issue until we are able to get to the point where no more than $100 million separates from the SEC average to Top third over a 5 year period.
-
01-19-2017, 11:40 AM
#106
Originally Posted by
BB30
1990 5-6
1991 7-5
1992 7-5
1993 3-6
1994 8-4
1995 3-8
1996 5-6
1997 7-4
1998 8-5
1999 10-2
2000 8-4
2001 3-8
2002 3-9
2003 2-10
2004 3-8
2005 3-8
2006 3-9
2007 8-5
2008 4-8
Really competed for the west.....
100-120 (.450)
-
01-19-2017, 11:42 AM
#107
Originally Posted by
BB30
Now Mullen's tenure
2009 5-7
2010 9-4
2011 7-6
2012 8-5
2013 7-6
2014 10-3
2015 9-4
2016 6-7
61-42 (.590)
-
01-19-2017, 11:43 AM
#108
Originally Posted by
Random Poster
That's not what I said at all. How many schools will fire you for not winning the NC? 5?
The regular season is what counts for coaches- the rest is fluff. Hell, Bear Bryant lost 7 bowl games in a row and tied another- Bama fans still claim NC's for some of those seasons
How many will hire you for winning one? You are just trolling.
-
01-19-2017, 11:45 AM
#109
Originally Posted by
Random Poster
That's not what I said at all. How many schools will fire you for not winning the NC? 5?
The regular season is what counts for coaches- the rest is fluff. Hell, Bear Bryant lost 7 bowl games in a row and tied another- Bama fans still claim NC's for some of those seasons
One more, you do know that back in the day the rankings were not updated after the bowls? They are now.
-
01-19-2017, 11:48 AM
#110
Originally Posted by
Jarius
You can only make so many facility upgrades with all of that money. At some point more money stops helping as much. The extra money that we are receiving is helping us much more than the schools getting extra money that have always had a lot of money
Yes, but it hasn't let us actually make up any ground the people we are chasing. For every upgrade we have made they have made at least one.
-
01-19-2017, 11:49 AM
#111
Originally Posted by
Really Clark?
I disagree. It's not nearly the diminishing return that people think. If it was just one year, I would agree but over the last 5 years, depending on the school, we are as much as $400 MIL behind what they have brought in. Bama is to the point they are hoarding their new corrdinators and assistant coaches off the field until a spot opens. The auxiliary staff and student athlete support staff ratio is lower. The recruiting budget that the AD office gives the staff is millions behind other schools. What happens when our budget drops back down from the ramp up of the baseball stadium expansion? This amount of budget difference will be an issue until we are able to get to the point where no more than $100 million separates from the SEC average to Top third over a 5 year period.
Exactly
-
01-19-2017, 12:04 PM
#112
I literally just don't give a shit anymore. We suck at recruiting and that will continue as long as Mullen is coach. Pretty sad to think about because I think Mullen could really compete if he could actually get some talent at multiple positions instead of sprinkled here and there. Oh well, life goes on.
-
01-19-2017, 12:13 PM
#113
Originally Posted by
Liverpooldawg
Yes, but it hasn't let us actually make up any ground the people we are chasing. For every upgrade we have made they have made at least one.
Recruits don't go to other schools and their facilities stand out as way better than MSU's any more. We have a very nice new facility and a very nice stadium. It's not quite as nice as some of the others we play but it's not something that stands out to players we recruit. It used to stand out very much. That is how our budget increase has closed the gap. We don't lose recruits for that reason any more. We recruit at an elite level in every single sport on campus except for football. We have a head football coach that isn't a very good recruiter. That's our problem. It's not a budget issue. It's a Dan Mullen issue.
Last edited by Jarius; 01-19-2017 at 12:15 PM.
-
01-19-2017, 12:14 PM
#114
Mullen has finished better than 4th place IN THE WEST one time in 8 years.
This is where we're at as a program. Mullen will win 7 or 8 games a year and go 2-4 or 3-3 in the west.
-
01-19-2017, 12:17 PM
#115
Originally Posted by
I seen it dawg
We don't work hard enough at it. It's really very simple.
Thank you. Don't make it something it's not. We need staff members that are passionate about recruiting. You can't have that developmental program mentality on the recruiting trail. It's 24/7, 365.
-
01-19-2017, 12:23 PM
#116
Originally Posted by
I seen it dawg
Sorry but Mullen is a great QB coach and keeper of a program. Keeps discipline in line and guys graduating. Everything else he's just meh. Just a guy.
Mullen hired a solid D-coordinator and he is turning the defense over to him. If he would fire the CC boys and fill out the rest of his staff with T-buck type recruiters then we would be in a great situation. Can Mullen do that? Most people think no.
-
01-19-2017, 12:23 PM
#117
Originally Posted by
Sacrifice
Mullen has finished better than 4th place IN THE WEST one time in 8 years.
This is where we're at as a program. Mullen will win 7 or 8 games a year and go 2-4 or 3-3 in the west.
He's gone 2-4 every year except '14. 7 years of no more than 2 wins in SEC W.
-
01-19-2017, 12:24 PM
#118
Damn! Recruiting sucks! Even our scoreboard camera flipped!**
-
01-19-2017, 12:45 PM
#119
Originally Posted by
dawgday166
Because of attitude dude. That's what makes Dak you know Dak. That's what has made him (so far) better than every QB taken before him. Dan didn't give Dak that magical attitude nor those inherent leadership skills.
Urban was able to harness Cardale's talent long enough (even despite the attitude) to win a Natty with him, cause I guarantee you he has at least the same talent Dak does.
This is stupid.
Attitude is part of the development of a QB. Urban won a championship with Jones but it wasn't because of him. He was a third string QB if you recall. The offense was super simplified and run heavy and they relied on a stout defense.
Dak came in as a very talented and undervalued recruit with a strong work ethic, but Dak wasn't DAK until after a couple of years in the system.
You keep moving the goalposts with your arguments.
-
01-19-2017, 12:53 PM
#120
Originally Posted by
dawgday166
Because of attitude dude.
No. Cardale Jones can't play QB in the NFL because he isn't good at being a QB. He has a big arm and size and can move decently well for his size. That's literally it. If you think those things and 'attitude' are the only things you need to be an NFL QB...
He has no idea what he's doing, he can't read defenses, and his accuracy sucks. But other than that, he's got everything it takes**
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.