-
Originally Posted by
JoseBrown
The question I have is why issue the NOA, and continue the investigation unless there is a show-cause being set-up? The investigation was continued long before the Tunsil draft night scandals popped up. So why not complete the investigation and release one NOA, and be done with it? There is a reason. Someone enlighten me on why they are handling it this way. Is it to get a response, because maybe they really weren't getting "exemplary" help from UNM? Is it to set them up to hit them very hard?
They had to get to a stopping point because of the length of the investigation. It's already way back in 2010 when the 1st infractions occurred- and it's gonna be 2017 before it all gets wrapped up most likely. Phase 2 will be another couple years most likely. Had to get to a stopping point to settle old business before attacking the most recent
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
They had to get to a stopping point because of the length of the investigation. It's alreaddy way back in 2010 when the 1st infractions occurred- and it's gonna be 2017 before it all gets wrapped up most likely. Phase 2 will be another couple years most likely. Had to get to a stopping point to settle old business before attacking the most recent
I gotcha. Well it they pick up where they left off until they decide to end this thing those 17'ers are gonna be in deep deep shit. I just hope they are able to break up the whole thing, not just the coaches and a few rogue boosters. The whole damn thing!
You're blind if you can't see improvement.....Freshmens......Strain.....Kick rocks and pound sand......Drag my Yankee ass outta here!......
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
They had to get to a stopping point because of the length of the investigation. It's already way back in 2010 when the 1st infractions occurred- and it's gonna be 2017 before it all gets wrapped up most likely. Phase 2 will be another couple years most likely. Had to get to a stopping point to settle old business before attacking the most recent
If this is the case, then the NCAA has to deny Ole Miss' request to delay their appearance in front of the COI. At this point, Ole Miss' strategy is to delay, delay, delay. In knowing that, the NCAA should sanction them for the first NOA and then continue their investigation on the new allegations. By delaying, the NCAA is offering Ole Miss further chances & time to reap the benefits of their cheating. That's absurd
That's like giving a drug lord 10 years to live in his mansion and compound before putting him in jail. Stupid
Last edited by ShotgunDawg; 05-28-2016 at 05:20 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.
Reply With Quote