-
RTGDF Welcome back?
Though Lebby wasnt my first pick, im excited to get back to running the ball.
He has great run concepts and is a consistent 60/40 run/pass guy.
2023 : 487/408
2022 : 581/407
2021 : 588/429
2020 : 462/335
I wish we had another year from Marks.
Last edited by HancockCountyDog; 11-25-2023 at 11:35 PM.
-
https://x.com/JBudDavis/status/1722256816439284150?s=20
He's not a RTGDF coach. He's a throw it early to build a lead and create space for the running game coach. He's 48% pass attempts and 48% rush attempts this year, and a lot of those rush attempts are late in the game after he has built up a lead. His offense scored 65 or more points 3 times this season. You don't do that by being ground and pound.
#AirRaidForever!!#SwingYourSword!!#FireArnett
-
Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
Though Lebby wasnt my first pick, im excited to get back to running the ball.
He has great run concepts and is a consistent 60/40 run/pass guy.
2023 : 487/408
2022 : 581/407
2021 : 588/429
2020 : 462/335
I wish we had another year from Marks.
You really need to read up on the veer and shoot. It’s has some really good concepts behind it.
-
We can have another year from Marks if he wants it.
-
Originally Posted by
KB21
https://x.com/JBudDavis/status/1722256816439284150?s=20
He's not a RTGDF coach. He's a throw it early to build a lead and create space for the running game coach. He's 48% pass attempts and 48% rush attempts this year, and a lot of those rush attempts are late in the game after he has built up a lead. His offense scored 65 or more points 3 times this season. You don't do that by being ground and pound.
Are you actually going to argue that Lebby is not a run first coach?
I guess nothing would surprise me from you, but the guy has run it 2118 vs 1579 over last 4 years.
That is a good thing, we need to be able to run it.
-
Originally Posted by
Coursesuper
You really need to read up on the veer and shoot. It’s has some really good concepts behind it.
Did you miss where I said he has great run concepts? I think we can get back to what we do best with a mobile QB.
-
Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
Did you miss where I said he has great run concepts? I think we can get back to what we do best with a mobile QB.
Spoken like a true Hawk.
-
Lebby isn't ground and pound but he does run the football and stay balanced. He will run the ball and stick with it if it is working. If it isn't he will still run to keep the D honest. He needs a QB that can run the ball. If he can get the right guy, I think we're in good shape. We never have a shortage of RB's. I hope he can find an OC he trusts to call the game though. I'm personally not a big fan of the HC calling plays for the most part. I'm hoping he can quickly learn the ins and outs of running a program. A good OC to help him will expedite that.
-
Originally Posted by
jimbo352
Lebby isn't ground and pound but he does run the football and stay balanced. He will run the ball and stick with it if it is working. If it isn't he will still run to keep the D honest. He needs a QB that can run the ball. If he can get the right guy, I think we're in good shape. We never have a shortage of RB's. I hope he can find an OC he trusts to call the game though. I'm personally not a big fan of the HC calling plays for the most part. I'm hoping he can quickly learn the ins and outs of running a program. A good OC to help him will expedite that.
Flowers and hopefully Petty will be great in his offense.
-
A lot of their runs are off of RPO's.
-
Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
Are you actually going to argue that Lebby is not a run first coach?
I guess nothing would surprise me from you, but the guy has run it 2118 vs 1579 over last 4 years.
That is a good thing, we need to be able to run it.
I mean yesterday his first play was a 60 yard bomb off of play action.
I'm not sure you can go off of years 3 and 4 of your data because that was with Kiffin who seems to like to run the ball more than Lebby.
I think we'll probably see pretty close to a 50/50 split run/pass but like I said many of the runs will be off of RPO's- the stats above said I believe 33% so it won't be really a traditional run game per say. More read optionish kind of like Dan but just a lot more simple than Dan.
-
I’m having deja vu, when I posted here that Barbay was a run first coach and people bashed me.
Im not saying he runs the triple option, the guy has great run concepts, but he does run the ball first. He also can adapt his offense to his personnel.
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
A lot of their runs are off of RPO's.
That is exactly what we need here, worked well with Dak and Fitz.
-
Originally Posted by
Charlie_Sheen420
That is exactly what we need here, worked well with Dak and Fitz.
Agree 100%.
Of course this offense has a much more developed passing attack IMO. Dan's was a bit crude. He made it work of course but Dan's offense was definitely run first.
-
Originally Posted by
Charlie_Sheen420
That is exactly what we need here, worked well with Dak and Fitz.
Agree, we get back to that and we can win and compete.
-
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
A lot of their runs are off of RPO's.
So is Mississippi and Kitten. We just forced them into alot of runs by playing a light box and then trying to jump back in and make the tackle
SEC Defenses will do the same to Lebby
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
Originally Posted by
Coach34
So is Mississippi and Kitten. We just forced them into alot of runs by playing a light box and then trying to jump back in and make the tackle
SEC Defenses will do the same to Lebby
Play action verticals
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.