Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 28

Thread: Umpire in ATL vs P

  1. #1
    Senior Member Thick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,511
    vCash
    4639

    Umpire in ATL vs P

    The call strikes aren?t remotely in the strike zone on TV

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,904
    vCash
    3100
    Way past time to go to an automated strike zone. It's 2023. To do otherwise is to openly admit you don't care about the accuracy of ball/strike calls.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,763
    vCash
    3100
    The umps in the playoffs have all been bad this year, every series. It?s to important to miss as many calls as I?ve seen this postseason. Grissom last ab for Braves he should?ve been 3-0 instead of 1-2. Changes the whole ab and with acuna on deck, just awful

  4. #4
    Senior Member Thick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,511
    vCash
    4639
    I did some cocktailing last night before I posted, but I stand by my complaint. Sorry for the jacked up thread name, but the strike zone was way off.

  5. #5
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,644
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by confucius say View Post
    Way past time to go to an automated strike zone. It's 2023. To do otherwise is to openly admit you don't care about the accuracy of ball/strike calls.
    I agree.

    I also think the ump being total trash isn't an excuse for the braves to be total trash the whole series. They're too good to be that bad

  6. #6
    Senior Member BrunswickDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Home of Slay, GA
    Posts
    12,029
    vCash
    1746501
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    I agree.

    I also think the ump being total trash isn't an excuse for the braves to be total trash the whole series. They're too good to be that bad
    Read an interesting take this morning - the difference in the past two seasons and '21 has been that the Braves haven't had a clubhouse "spark" guy = specifically Joc Pederson. Joc could do some goofy shit (like the pearls) - but he had swagger and attitude that this team seems to miss. Yeah, there are bat flips and chest bumps - but no grit. Kinda like what MSU had with guys like Jake, Mac, Rowedy and Tanner Allen. The guys that are those MFers.

    Kind of reminds me of the 90s Braves - as much as I loved Chipper, he was only that MFer against the Mets, and then late in his career when they didn't have enough talent to win it all. The '90s Braves were "too professional" and rarely seemed to have a spark guy.
    "After dealing with Ole Miss for over a year," he said, "I've learned to expect their leadership to do and say things that the leadership at other Division I schools would never consider doing and to justify their actions by reminding themselves that "We're Ole Miss.""
    - Tom Mars, Esq. 4.9.18

  7. #7
    Senior Member sandjunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    The dirt diamond or gym
    Posts
    736
    vCash
    2610
    Ring that Bell

  8. #8
    Senior Member starkvegasdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Eye of the Storm
    Posts
    22,779
    vCash
    3275
    The Braves offense disappearing in the post season is a time honored tradition. It's like seeing the first hummingbird in the spring and children being excited on Christmas morning. How many games started by Glavine, Maddox, Smoltz, and Avery were lost 1-0 or 2-1 in October?

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    1,816
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by Commercecomet24 View Post
    The umps in the playoffs have all been bad this year, every series. It?s to important to miss as many calls as I?ve seen this postseason. Grissom last ab for Braves he should?ve been 3-0 instead of 1-2. Changes the whole ab and with acuna on deck, just awful
    Disagree. He was calling low "on screen" all game and those pitches were tailing down. Strike Zone is 3D not 2D and I imagine the pitches might have scuffed some part of the "official" zone, but we're well within what the Ump had been calling.

    All you can ever ask an umpire is to be consistent. Looks like he scored 95% and the grissom at bat didn't include a top 3 impactful "missed call".

  10. #10
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,763
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Tater View Post
    Disagree. He was calling low "on screen" all game and those pitches were tailing down. Strike Zone is 3D not 2D and I imagine the pitches might have scuffed some part of the "official" zone, but we're well within what the Ump had been calling.

    All you can ever ask an umpire is to be consistent. Looks like he scored 95% and the grissom at bat didn't include a top 3 impactful "missed call".
    Naw he was mediocre. Those pitches from side view showed they were below the knee on grissom, not strikes. And grissom being 3-0 instead of 1-2 was a big difference. Did it cost the braves the game? No, but it would've given them a chance. The umps have been bad across the board in the playoffs, not just in this series.

    ETA The braves sucked at the plate with the exception of Riley and that's the reason they lost not the umpires.
    Last edited by Commercecomet24; 10-13-2023 at 11:35 AM.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,763
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Commercecomet24 View Post
    Naw he was bad, and he didn't just miss low pitches he missed pitches off the plate as well. Those pitches from side view showed they were below the knee on grissom, not strikes. And grissom being 3-0 instead of 1-2 was a big difference. Did it cost the braves the game? No, but it would've given them a chance. The umps have been bad across the board in the playoffs, not just in this series.
    del

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,904
    vCash
    3100
    I didn't watch the game and don't care about the breves or any MLB team. My comment is about balls and strikes calls generally.

    "All you can ask from an umpire is to be consistent" is archaic and a poor take. That was true in 1990. Now, You can ask the for the caller of balls and strikes to be automated so that it is the exact same call and strike zone 100% of the time. Otherwise, you don't believe in accuracy.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,763
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by confucius say View Post
    I didn't watch the game and don't care about the breves or any MLB team. My comment is about balls and strikes calls generally.

    "All you can ask from an umpire is to be consistent" is archaic and a poor take. That was true in 1990. Now, You can ask the for the caller of balls and strikes to be automated so that it is the exact same call and strike zone 100% of the time. Otherwise, you don't believe in accuracy.
    Very good point. I honestly hated the idea of the automated strike zone but i've seen to many pitches change at bats and games. Like you said 100% accuracy should be required now, i mean if you're gonna go for getting fair/foul, safe/out right, why not balls/strikes? Of course the umpires union is extremely powerful and I doubt it happens for awhile.

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    1,816
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by confucius say View Post
    I didn't watch the game and don't care about the breves or any MLB team. My comment is about balls and strikes calls generally.

    "All you can ask from an umpire is to be consistent" is archaic and a poor take. That was true in 1990. Now, You can ask the for the caller of balls and strikes to be automated so that it is the exact same call and strike zone 100% of the time. Otherwise, you don't believe in accuracy.
    I mean yea, but we're not talking about robots. That's a different discussion. Having umpired before, my dad taught me that the only thing that matters with my zone and judgment is to be consistent. If it's consistent for both teams, then I can keep doing this and we can work on making it more accurate. If it's inconsistent, well, go back to score keeping and make a fourth of the cash lmao.

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    1,816
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by Commercecomet24 View Post
    Naw he was mediocre. Those pitches from side view showed they were below the knee on grissom, not strikes. And grissom being 3-0 instead of 1-2 was a big difference. Did it cost the braves the game? No, but it would've given them a chance. The umps have been bad across the board in the playoffs, not just in this series.

    ETA The braves sucked at the plate with the exception of Riley and that's the reason they lost not the umpires.
    I mean, this is literally what a computer would tell you. Those low and in strikes would have been called by a computer. These guys use the same statcast and ball tracking data to show whether it's a ball or a strike. The computers disagreed with the guy on 5 total pitches.

    The tv box really seems screwy from what people on the internet say cause even Phillies fans expected way worse.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    1,112
    vCash
    3275
    The automated strike zone that was used in the Atlantic league is hilarious. Just Google Atlantic league strike zone and look at that jacked up system. Literally a ball at the guys chin was called strike 3. Also a ball that the catcher dove into the left handed batters box and missed (out of reach) was called strike 3 and the umpire had to comply with it.

    This strike zone concept with computers is not the answer.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,763
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Tater View Post
    I mean, this is literally what a computer would tell you. Those low and in strikes would have been called by a computer. These guys use the same statcast and ball tracking data to show whether it's a ball or a strike. The computers disagreed with the guy on 5 total pitches.

    The tv box really seems screwy from what people on the internet say cause even Phillies fans expected way worse.
    It's just like any other technology it will become way more accurate than a human being. They guy scored an 87 on called strikes that were balls, that would be a B in grading. I don't think we want a B effort deciding playoff games. I like these discussions and always enjoy your opinions, Tater, especially on baseball. I coached so long I really have a strong dislike for home plate umpires, so im probably a little biased lol! I have been known to influence a few games over the years, lol!

  18. #18
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,763
    vCash
    3100
    I would like to say this thread sure beats the heck out of the 50 gazillion "We suck, fire Arnett" threads.

  19. #19
    Senior Member sandjunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    The dirt diamond or gym
    Posts
    736
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by Commercecomet24 View Post
    I would like to say this thread sure beats the heck out of the 50 gazillion "We suck, fire Arnett" threads.
    Should it transition to ?we suck, fire Lemonis??

    To keep it thread related

  20. #20
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,763
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by sandjunky View Post
    Should it transition to ?we suck, fire Lemonis??

    To keep it thread related
    Lol you're probably right on that!

    Have some rep!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.