Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 61 to 78 of 78

Thread: CZA post-practice

  1. #61
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Posts
    805
    vCash
    1000
    Quote Originally Posted by TrapGame View Post
    And again I say bullshit.

    Will we have the best ground game in the league? No, it will be serviceable w/ some flashes of above average play. But, this fixation that we'll look like the Keystone Cops on the OL is just unfounded.
    Ridiculous, right? We ran for 146 on mighty A&M last year with 2 running plays.

  2. #62
    Senior Member TrapGame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    13,179
    vCash
    4975
    Quote Originally Posted by RockyDog View Post
    Ridiculous, right? We ran for 146 on mighty A&M last year with 2 running plays.
    On most of the defenses we will face it will only take the OL doing their jobs with a TE hitting his block to spring Woody for a 20 yard gash. And most defenses won't be able to arm tackle Woody.

  3. #63
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Posts
    805
    vCash
    1000
    Quote Originally Posted by TrapGame View Post
    On most of the defenses we will face it will only take the OL doing their jobs with a TE hitting his block to spring Woody for a 20 yard gash. And most defenses won't be able to arm tackle Woody.
    I think people have become so blinded by how inept we were at running the ball the first 2 years of Leach.

    If we "only" average 150 yards per game, that is 1800 yards rushing which is STILL below average for an SEC team. However, IF we can complement that with a 3000-3500 yard passing season from WR, then that is top 40 production. MSU fans have become so negative that they don't believe we can ever field a team that is capable of both running and passing. People act like it has to be one or the other. Meanwhile, over 40 teams last year put up 3000 pass/2000 rush yard seasons.

    Arkansas and Mississippi both had 3000/3000 seasons playing the same mighty opponents that some say can't be run on.

  4. #64
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,893
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Really Clark? View Post
    We ran for 6 yards per carry against TAM last year in the worse running offensive scheme and philosophy you could have. I think we can squeeze a few yards against them this year.
    We will see. They were last on the league in run defense last year. Running on them was like running on ark. Easy.
    They are stacked with supposed nfl guys up front now who are older and we will be on the road. FPI likes their run defense. Of course jimbo can score anything up, so we will see.
    Last edited by confucius say; 08-09-2023 at 10:00 AM.

  5. #65
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,893
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by RockyDog View Post
    I think people have become so blinded by how inept we were at running the ball the first 2 years of Leach.

    If we "only" average 150 yards per game, that is 1800 yards rushing which is STILL below average for an SEC team. However, IF we can complement that with a 3000-3500 yard passing season from WR, then that is top 40 production. MSU fans have become so negative that they don't believe we can ever field a team that is capable of both running and passing. People act like it has to be one or the other. Meanwhile, over 40 teams last year put up 3000 pass/2000 rush yard seasons.

    Arkansas and Mississippi both had 3000/3000 seasons playing the same mighty opponents that some say can't be run on.
    Ark and OM both had running qb. Dart and Jefferson both were run threats and ran for over 600 yards.
    Unless we go alot of wildcat or wright, we don't.

  6. #66
    Senior Member TrapGame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    13,179
    vCash
    4975
    Quote Originally Posted by confucius say View Post
    Ark and OM both had running qb. Dart and Jefferson both were run threats and ran for over 600 yards.
    Unless we go alot of wildcat or wright, we don't.
    Oh, so now it's not the OL it's that we don't have a running QB?

  7. #67
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,893
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by TrapGame View Post
    Oh, so now it's not the OL it's that we don't have a running QB?
    Having a running qb makes the OL job much easier, yes. Especially guys who can run and throw. If we had dart or Jefferson or Daniels etc... I would feel much better about our run game. Is that even a debatable point?
    Last edited by confucius say; 08-09-2023 at 10:09 AM.

  8. #68
    Senior Member TrapGame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    13,179
    vCash
    4975
    Quote Originally Posted by confucius say View Post
    Having a running qb makes the OL job much easier, yes. Especially guys who can run and throw. If we had dart or Jefferson or Daniels etc... I would feel much better about our run game. Is that even a debatable point?
    No, you're just making it seem like our OL can't work without a running QB. And some of those running threats you mentioned, our defense shut down.

  9. #69
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Posts
    805
    vCash
    1000
    App State had 3000 pass/2400 rush and got 116 rushing from their QB. If we get a couple hundred yards on the season from Tulu and other receivers running end arounds, then that is bonus yards that help the run game. Maybe Wright can contribute 100 or 2. Just because WR doesn't run doesn't mean our offense is going to suck against anybody with a pulse.

    We don't have to run Don Mullins offense to move the ball.

  10. #70
    Senior Member NWADAWG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    432
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by confucius say View Post
    Having a running qb makes the OL job much easier, yes. Especially guys who can run and throw. If we had dart or Jefferson or Daniels etc... I would feel much better about our run game. Is that even a debatable point?
    And if we had dart or Jefferson or Daniels etc... I would feel a little worse about our passing game.

  11. #71
    Senior Member TrapGame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    13,179
    vCash
    4975
    I hear there's a video going round with Will under center, hitting a TE out of play action for a TD.

  12. #72
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    6,178
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by TrapGame View Post
    I hear there's a video going round with Will under center, hitting a TE out of play action for a TD.
    Everyone wants to be a beast...until its time to do what beasts do.

  13. #73
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,050
    vCash
    55927
    Quote Originally Posted by TrapGame View Post
    Exactly.

    I do not understand why people aren't seeing this.
    Because most people don't understand the trenches my man

  14. #74
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,050
    vCash
    55927
    Quote Originally Posted by TrapGame View Post
    I hear there's a video going round with Will under center, hitting a TE out of play action for a TD.
    KB has left the chat...

  15. #75
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    6,178
    vCash
    2610
    It was actually 3 TE's. Pass to Harmon off the right side, while Goede and Spivey are in pass pro in a bunch tight to the left.
    Everyone wants to be a beast...until its time to do what beasts do.

  16. #76
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30,391
    vCash
    17200
    Play action is going to make our offense so much better. So glad I dont have to watch that garbage we were running anymore
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  17. #77

  18. #78
    Senior Member Thick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,502
    vCash
    4639
    I agree completely. No more drop into coverage immediately when the ball is snapped.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.