Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: MSU Baseball mid early season moves

  1. #1
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,515
    vCash
    3700

    MSU Baseball mid early season moves

    Friday- Small
    Saturday- Ginn

    Earth shattering I know.

    Sunday- Tyler Spring. We need to see what he can do because I think he's our best chance to have a conventional starter in the rotation.

    Closer- Keegan
    Relief ace- Cole Gordon
    Set-up- Barlow
    Self, Brandon Smith, Leibelt, Colby White in ONE INNING STINTS.

    Midweek- Plumlee and the pen.

    C- Skelton (shocking I know)
    1B- Hatcher- really almost has to happen at this point.
    2B- Rowdey Jordan. Makes more sense than Allen because he is more athletic and came up as an infielder in high school.
    3B- Foscue
    SS- Westburg

    LF- Cumbest- gives us more power, speed, and as good if not better defense.
    CF- Mangum (Shocking)
    RF- MacNamee (Shocking)

    DH- Allen. Even though he is slumping I still think he is a better offensive player than Halter.

    Doesn't really re-invent the wheel but I'm essentially replacing Halter with Cumbest.

  2. #2
    Senior Member bulldogcountry1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,443
    vCash
    3700
    Plumlee and James are really our only options on Sunday right now. Until someone else can pitch 4 good innings against a SWAC team, then they don’t deserve an SEC start. Nobody else had done that. Spring’s longest outing is 2 innings and Cerantola can’t hit the side of a barn. You know what you are going to get with Plumlee, and that's going to have to be good enough.

    Is McLeod going to be healthy enough to pitch this year? He performed well in the fall.

    I’m not ready for wholesale defensive changes, either. At the very least, it will require an adjustment period, and we still probably won’t be any better off. We just need to figure something out at 2B and go from there. I just don’t see Halter hitting SEC pitching, anyway. Put the best defender we have there and then see where we are.


    For what it's worth, in pre-game warm-ups, the only guys working the IF are :

    1B - Allen, Hatcher, Childers
    2B - Halter, L Jordan
    SS - Westburg
    3B - Foscue, Gilbert
    Last edited by bulldogcountry1; 04-02-2019 at 07:12 AM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,319
    vCash
    3700
    They tries Rowdey at second for a brief time. That got axed fast, so that's out.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,319
    vCash
    3700
    As for Spring starting, it's not very close to happening, considering he wasn't on the active roster this weekend. 27 players and he wasn't one of them. Maybe it changes, but one can tell our confidence level on him isn't the super high when they took him out mid inning last week.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,467
    vCash
    3700
    Concerning Spring, last week when he was pitching, he was doing o.k. I thought. Not tearing it up, but he was getting along fairly well with all things considered. Lemonis came out to the mound and seemed to be unhappy with what was going on and pulled Spring. He wasn’t in a bad jam and Foxhall hadn’t been out for a visit, so it seemed a little abrupt. I got the feeling that he was not making the coaches happy at all.

    Maybe I am totally off base on this but it just seemed a little different.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gulfport,MS
    Posts
    1,143
    vCash
    1002510
    I honestly do not think Gunner Halter has played so bad that we need to disrupt our entire outfield. Cumbest is an impressive kid, but he is not ready to hit SEC pitching on a day to day basis. Allen is my biggest concern currently his defense is and continues to be a huge liability and it is affecting Halter, and now his bat has gone ice cold. I imagine we will take the Rowdey approach and let him work through it, but with Rowdey is a plus fielder so you can justify hitting .200

  7. #7
    Senior Member Tbonewannabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,678
    vCash
    3500
    Quote Originally Posted by Scared_Hitless View Post
    I honestly do not think Gunner Halter has played so bad that we need to disrupt our entire outfield. Cumbest is an impressive kid, but he is not ready to hit SEC pitching on a day to day basis. Allen is my biggest concern currently his defense is and continues to be a huge liability and it is affecting Halter, and now his bat has gone ice cold. I imagine we will take the Rowdey approach and let him work through it, but with Rowdey is a plus fielder so you can justify hitting .200
    Allen and Westburg are below SEC average defensively. When you hit the ball like Westburg then you take the good with the bad. Allen struggling makes his subpar defense stick out even more. Maybe let Hatcher play 1st and DH Allen if Hatcher is better defensively.

    I will say that Halter replacing Stovall is why Halter isn't as impressive. Stovall might have been the best defensive 2nd baseman I have seen wearing the MS. Halter in the few plays at SS made some that Westburg hasn't been able to.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gulfport,MS
    Posts
    1,143
    vCash
    1002510
    Quote Originally Posted by Tbonewannabe View Post
    Allen and Westburg are below SEC average defensively. When you hit the ball like Westburg then you take the good with the bad. Allen struggling makes his subpar defense stick out even more. Maybe let Hatcher play 1st and DH Allen if Hatcher is better defensively.

    I will say that Halter replacing Stovall is why Halter isn't as impressive. Stovall might have been the best defensive 2nd baseman I have seen wearing the MS. Halter in the few plays at SS made some that Westburg hasn't been able to.
    100% agree we have had Gridley and then Stovall at 2b the last few years they were so good we were spoiled. I think Halter is more than serviceable. Allen is struggling and doesn't have the athleticism or bat of Westy. I say shake it up or please at least drop him down the lineup.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    4,797
    vCash
    3621
    Foscue can play 2b
    Skelton can play 3b

    That lets us just move Hatcher to 1b and get more quality bats in the game.

    I'm not sure that Keegan is not the 3rd best starter...the other guys are way more scary. Spring needs a chance to start, if does not give up 4 in the first, he's hired

  10. #10
    Senior Member Tbonewannabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,678
    vCash
    3500
    Quote Originally Posted by Scared_Hitless View Post
    100% agree we have had Gridley and then Stovall at 2b the last few years they were so good we were spoiled. I think Halter is more than serviceable. Allen is struggling and doesn't have the athleticism or bat of Westy. I say shake it up or please at least drop him down the lineup.
    Gridley was very good, well above average and Stovall was Elite. Anyone following those 2 wouldn't look great.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,319
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by The Federalist Engineer View Post
    Foscue can play 2b
    Skelton can play 3b

    That lets us just move Hatcher to 1b and get more quality bats in the game.

    I'm not sure that Keegan is not the 3rd best starter...the other guys are way more scary. Spring needs a chance to start, if does not give up 4 in the first, he's hired
    Foscue can play second. And Skelton can play third. But being able to and making us better are two different things. And those two things don't make us better anywhere. Actually worse.

  12. #12
    Senior Member bulldogcountry1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,443
    vCash
    3700
    One thing that could help us immediately is for Westburg to not miss high on his throws to first. When you miss high, you have zero chance of making an out, and the runner typically ends up at second. When you miss low, it's and out over 50% of the time, and the runner rarely gets the extra base. That's what Gridley and Stovall always did, and it gives you a chance. He throws one into row 12 every weekend, and that can be eliminated.

    Whoever the best defender is at first should be there. Maybe that's Allen, but the game is really fast for him right now.

  13. #13
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogcountry1 View Post
    One thing that could help us immediately is for Westburg to not miss high on his throws to first. When you miss high, you have zero chance of making an out, and the runner typically ends up at second. When you miss low, it's and out over 50% of the time, and the runner rarely gets the extra base. That's what Gridley and Stovall always did, and it gives you a chance. He throws one into row 12 every weekend, and that can be eliminated.

    Whoever the best defender is at first should be there. Maybe that's Allen, but the game is really fast for him right now.
    Hard not to miss high or low when you have a 5'8 first baseman that doesn't know how or when to stretch for the ball, and doesn't help our guys in the field at all due to poor foot and stretching technique over there. You put a decent first baseman with a 6 foot frame over there and you can probably cut Westburg's errors in half. I can't count the number of times we had an error and I thought, "damn Tanner, if you just reach up or stretch a little that's an out".

  14. #14
    Senior Member Tbonewannabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,678
    vCash
    3500
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    Hard not to miss high or low when you have a 5'8 first baseman that doesn't know how or when to stretch for the ball, and doesn't help our guys in the field at all due to poor foot and stretching technique over there. You put a decent first baseman with a 6 foot frame over there and you can probably cut Westburg's errors in half. I can't count the number of times we had an error and I thought, "damn Tanner, if you just reach up or stretch a little that's an out".
    He also doesn't dig them out of the dirt very well. I guess that is what you get when you move a 2B over to first.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,515
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    Hard not to miss high or low when you have a 5'8 first baseman that doesn't know how or when to stretch for the ball, and doesn't help our guys in the field at all due to poor foot and stretching technique over there. You put a decent first baseman with a 6 foot frame over there and you can probably cut Westburg's errors in half. I can't count the number of times we had an error and I thought, "damn Tanner, if you just reach up or stretch a little that's an out".
    This is my thinking as well.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,319
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Tbonewannabe View Post
    He also doesn't dig them out of the dirt very well. I guess that is what you get when you move a 2B over to first.
    Haha. It's harder to play second than it is to pick balls at first. Need to pick at second too. Tanner isn't a good fielder, agree. But he damn sure isnt a second baseman.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,515
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    Haha. It's harder to play second than it is to pick balls at first. Need to pick at second too. Tanner isn't a good fielder, agree. But he damn sure isnt a second baseman.
    I agree. I think he's an DH/OF type.

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,319
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    I agree. I think he's an DH/OF type.
    There are only two explanations for Allen staying at first over Hatcher. And I'm leaving the positon of the lineup concerning Tanner part at our of this discussion. 1- they think Allen is a better 1b than Hatcher. Meh, find that hard to believe at this point but ok. 2- which makes way more sense, Hatcher really struggles with Lhp. If you start Hatcher at 1b and dh Allen you are stuck w hatch the entire game there. You can't take him out. We don't have another first baseman and you would lose the dh if you put Allen there. I get it, Allen is struggling at the plate and some will say just dh someone else. I do think Tanner is going to hit. He hit last year and this year he's cut his k's way down. So that's better. I don't think we are at panic point w him just yet.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,467
    vCash
    3700
    I think Homedawg just figured out the Allen/Hatcher 1B/DH thing. Hatcher’s struggles against lefties.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Tbonewannabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,678
    vCash
    3500
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    Haha. It's harder to play second than it is to pick balls at first. Need to pick at second too. Tanner isn't a good fielder, agree. But he damn sure isnt a second baseman.
    While I agree, wasn't Tanner a 2B originally?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.