-
09-29-2018, 08:14 PM
#501
Originally Posted by
Red Sox Dawg
Not this year.
Moor thanks to moorhead
-
09-29-2018, 08:14 PM
#502
Originally Posted by
MarketingBully
How was that not targeting?
Because it's not. It's called a GREAT DC knowing what the hell he is doing and a GREAT HC beating a TOP RETURNING TEAM IN THE SEC.
-
09-29-2018, 08:15 PM
#503
Originally Posted by
Bothrops
Who we gonna hire? Another unproven is what it will be.
Didn't have to hire this one. That's on the AD
-
09-29-2018, 08:15 PM
#504
Our staff sucks. Penn State can have you back.
-
09-29-2018, 08:15 PM
#505
Originally Posted by
Statecoachingblows**
Dan finally beat a " ranked" opponent on the road
Nope, because we wont be ranked at the end of the season**
-
09-29-2018, 08:15 PM
#506
Originally Posted by
Pollodawg
Fitz is awful. He?s regressed so badly.
The entire team has. No Fing excuse. 200 TOTAL yards of offense with almost the same personnel and better receivers 2 future OLine draft choices, No FING EXCUSE. Dammit Moorhead you need to get your head out of your ass
-
09-29-2018, 08:15 PM
#507
The fact of the matter is only Dan could win with some of these Dan players. We have a QB who can only throw a catchable ball 33% of the time and a WR who is playing who is a Sun Belt level player (Mitchell) who drops the balls the 33% of the balls which Fitz throws which are catchable. I say **** it this season is done bench Fitz and play Key.
-
09-29-2018, 08:17 PM
#508
I’m through with the Fitz experiment. Through. QBs run this offense to perfection and have done really well with it. When you have a QB that can’t throw running this offense you will fail.
-
09-29-2018, 08:20 PM
#509
I want to know who was advising Cohen. Who thought we had the offensive talent to run this type of offense?
-
09-29-2018, 08:21 PM
#510
Don’t think the coach has lost the team but he has lost some fans for sure. Really bad team right now. We don’t have enough SEC quality players and it doesn’t look like they fit the new system. Sadly we aren’t making a significant improvement in recruiting either. Going to be a tough few years it appears.
-
09-29-2018, 08:24 PM
#511
Originally Posted by
chainedup_Dawg
Nope, because we wont be ranked at the end of the season**
Because he beat us
-
09-29-2018, 08:25 PM
#512
3 carries for 16 yards for our backs in the 2nd half. We couldnt finish a drive in the first half so Moorhead went back full retard.
If Fitz cant run his offense then he has got to change it. We look lost. Shoop isnt much better the only thing saving him is the talent we have on D
-
09-29-2018, 08:27 PM
#513
Originally Posted by
MarketingBully
The fact of the matter is only Dan could win with some of these Dan players. We have a QB who can only throw a catchable ball 33% of the time and a WR who is playing who is a Sun Belt level player (Mitchell) who drops the balls the 33% of the balls which Fitz throws which are catchable. I say **** it this season is done bench Fitz and play Key.
A QB who was completing 56% last year and was in Heisman talks. But which is it. IT is Fitz bad passing or drops. Your numbers don't add up!
YES let's CALL IN THE BACK UP BECAUSE A RECORD SETTING QB is the damn issue. Punish the QB because of the AD and HC mistakes!
-
09-29-2018, 08:28 PM
#514
Originally Posted by
MarketingBully
I’m through with the Fitz experiment. Through. QBs run this offense to perfection and have done really well with it. When you have a QB that can’t throw running this offense you will fail.
So go with a worse QB rather than the HC who stated you adapt to the personel… Gotcha.
100% disagree.
-
09-29-2018, 08:46 PM
#515
Originally Posted by
Red Sox Dawg
Don’t think the coach has lost the team but he has lost some fans for sure. Really bad team right now. We don’t have enough SEC quality players and it doesn’t look like they fit the new system. Sadly we aren’t making a significant improvement in recruiting either. Going to be a tough few years it appears.
We have a projected 6- 20 NFL drafts on Defense.
We return a 1000+ yard rusher who knows how to pick up blocks and blitzes who is on the damn bench.
We return a Heisman candidate QB who is 100 yards from break Tebows' record. We returned a 9 win team and added depth …
and you think it's that we don't have talent?
-
09-29-2018, 09:09 PM
#516
Originally Posted by
MarketingBully
The fact of the matter is only Dan could win with some of these Dan players. We have a QB who can only throw a catchable ball 33% of the time and a WR who is playing who is a Sun Belt level player (Mitchell) who drops the balls the 33% of the balls which Fitz throws which are catchable. I say **** it this season is done bench Fitz and play Key.
If you're in SEC as a WR ... CATCH THE DAMN BALL WHEN IT HITS YOU IN THE HANDS ... SEC WRs CATCH THOSE!!!
-
09-29-2018, 09:23 PM
#517
Originally Posted by
Coach007
We have a projected 6- 20 NFL drafts on Defense.
We return a 1000+ yard rusher who knows how to pick up blocks and blitzes who is on the damn bench.
We return a Heisman candidate QB who is 100 yards from break Tebows' record. We returned a 9 win team and added depth …
and you think it's that we don't have talent?
6-20 NFL draft picks on Defense? We don’t have that many on the 85 man roster. Could you list them?
-
09-30-2018, 12:46 AM
#518
Bankerdawg, we still got that 9-win ban bet? Backtracking, I'm sure
-
09-30-2018, 12:58 AM
#519
Originally Posted by
Red Sox Dawg
6-20 NFL draft picks on Defense? We don’t have that many on the 85 man roster. Could you list them?
Simmons
Sweat
Rivers
Gay
Abram
Peters (granted, injured)
Thompson
That's an easy 7 there, and there are more.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.