-
Watching the Bama/MSU 2017 game on SECN.
What is the rule if a WR goes out of bounds and comes back in and makes the catch? (See Calvin Ridley 61 yd catch)
Last edited by Lance Harbor; 07-08-2018 at 10:33 AM.
-
Either illegal touching or Touchdowns alabama, depending on if the check clears or not.
-
Rule #1 is Bama wins. Rule #1 overrules all other rules.
-
The worst part about this play isn’t the fact that the refs missed the call. I can understand missing someone step out. The worst part is, the ref threw his hat down. He actively knew and saw it. He knew the rule. AND HE STILL IGNORED IT.
Was very frustrating watching in person. Even more frustrating watching this rerun.
-
Thought so. Saw the hat. Terrible.
Originally Posted by
dantheman4248
The worst part about this play isn’t the fact that the refs missed the call. I can understand missing someone step out. The worst part is, the ref threw his hat down. He actively knew and saw it. He knew the rule. AND HE STILL IGNORED IT.
Was very frustrating watching in person. Even more frustrating watching this rerun.
-
Originally Posted by
dantheman4248
The worst part about this play isn’t the fact that the refs missed the call. I can understand missing someone step out. The worst part is, the ref threw his hat down. He actively knew and saw it. He knew the rule. AND HE STILL IGNORED IT.
Was very frustrating watching in person. Even more frustrating watching this rerun.
Scrong 1st post, way scrong. Welcome and well done sir.
-
Originally Posted by
dantheman4248
The worst part about this play isn’t the fact that the refs missed the call. I can understand missing someone step out. The worst part is, the ref threw his hat down. He actively knew and saw it. He knew the rule. AND HE STILL IGNORED IT.
Was very frustrating watching in person. Even more frustrating watching this rerun.
I never noticed that. I'm pissed again
-
That was a hell of a game though. Our guys came out, punched them in the mouth, and almost got it done. Gutsy effort by our bunch and I couldn't have been more proud.
Screw Bama and their refs tho
-
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
-
Originally Posted by
dantheman4248
The worst part about this play isn’t the fact that the refs missed the call. I can understand missing someone step out. The worst part is, the ref threw his hat down. He actively knew and saw it. He knew the rule. AND HE STILL IGNORED IT.
Was very frustrating watching in person. Even more frustrating watching this rerun.
Exactly, that one ref illegitimized the whole game. I will never watch that game again because of that. Pretty obvious to me the ref was going to call Ridley out of bounds as he should have UNTIL he saw the result of the play. After that, THEN he just ignored the fact the WR ran himself out of bounds and all was well for the SEC.
-
Originally Posted by
dantheman4248
The worst part about this play isn’t the fact that the refs missed the call. I can understand missing someone step out. The worst part is, the ref threw his hat down. He actively knew and saw it. He knew the rule. AND HE STILL IGNORED IT.
Was very frustrating watching in person. Even more frustrating watching this rerun.
He ruled he was forced out instead of going out on his own. Rosebowl was standing right by him when the official spoke to the Head Ref after the play. Said the official was saying "I got a force out."
-
And Dan informs Cohen the next morning that he will not be returning next year ..
Should have replaced his ****ing ass at that moment.
Slept walked thru Arky and zero preparation for the egg bowl
-
Originally Posted by
confucius say
He ruled he was forced out instead of going out on his own. Rosebowl was standing right by him when the official spoke to the Head Ref after the play. Said the official was saying "I got a force out."
EXACTLY, it was the only call he could make AFTER the play ended to let it stand given he had thrown his cap down. Of course this was after he was looking right up the boundary where it would have been obvious from his vantage point that there was never any contact between Peters and Ridley. Just a dirty biased call.
-
Originally Posted by
maroonmania
Exactly, that one ref illegitimized the whole game. I will never watch that game again because of that. Pretty obvious to me the ref was going to call Ridley out of bounds as he should have UNTIL he saw the result of the play. After that, THEN he just ignored the fact the WR ran himself out of bounds and all was well for the SEC.
I saw him run out of bounds from the upper deck on the east side. Easily 250 yards from play. Magically replay never had a good angle to show it either.
-
Yep, def went out on his own. (55 second mark)
Originally Posted by
Lord McBuckethead
I saw him run out of bounds from the upper deck on the east side. Easily 250 yards from play. Magically replay never had a good angle to show it either.
-
It was illegal touching and shouldn’t have been a completion. He wasn’t forced out of bounds on either of those plays. Dan should have challenged that play and he would have won. The other illegal touching play they had to call on a review also ironically to see if Ridley caught a ball. On the long completion that led to a touchdown when Ridley stepped out of bounds you could see our secondary let up. That’s exactly how he got open was going out of bounds. But I digress. We should have gone for it on 4th and 1 down near the goal line when they got a running into the kicker penalty. Instead, we let the field goal stand and only were up a TD. It’s a different game if we get a TD there 28-17 vs 24-17. We were gashing them running the football too. But Dan went conservative instead of balls to the wall. When you are facing Saban, you have to take chances and go balls to the wall there. Dan was never good in games that mattered like that. He won the games he should of won and lost most of the games he should of lost. That’s why I’m very suspect on how good he will be at Florida.
-
Originally Posted by
Lord McBuckethead
I saw him run out of bounds from the upper deck on the east side. Easily 250 yards from play. Magically replay never had a good angle to show it either.
Should of been challenged by Dan. Surely our coaches not only saw him go out of bounds but saw the ref with his hat off. That is challengable play.
-
Originally Posted by
confucius say
He ruled he was forced out instead of going out on his own. Rosebowl was standing right by him when the official spoke to the Head Ref after the play. Said the official was saying "I got a force out."
Funny that our guy never touched him. Ridley had a penchant of going out of bounds too when Hurts started scrambling. He had two illegal touching situations. One was seen by the refs and one was caught on replay. The only one that was called was caught on replay.
-
Originally Posted by
MarketingBully
Should of been challenged by Dan. Surely our coaches not only saw him go out of bounds but saw the ref with his hat off. That is challengable play.
I'm not sure that is reviewable. I don't think I've ever seen a WR out of bounds play reviewed but I'm not sure on the rule. Receiver being "forced out" is normally a judgement call for the most part so I'm not sure you could challenge that. Maybe someone is more up on the rules than me. Of course, on that play with Ridley, since he was never touched at all, then the call should have been black and white that it was illegal touching.
-
Yep, I don't think you can review whether a receiver was forced out or not.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.