Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 61 to 68 of 68

Thread: Is MSU Football at Top 20 Program?

  1. #61
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,203
    vCash
    1000619
    Quote Originally Posted by 99jc View Post
    Stretch over the 2000's Bama looked like shit for the most part. This is just since the playoff started.
    FIFY
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17

  2. #62
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    19,808
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by BrunswickDawg View Post
    Some of the usual suspects, and some 2nd generation powers (like FSU) - but not all. Nebraska? UCLA? Texas? Miami? Tennessee? Texas A&M? Arkansas? Georgia Tech (#14 all-time in wins)? Va Tech? West Va? Colorado? Minnesota)? Wisconsin? BYU? South Carolina? I don't see any of those schools and they all - historically - have been above us. That's 15 of the top 50 winning-est programs of all time not in the top group now. All of those schools except VT, WVa, BYU, S Car & A&M have multiple national titles. All of them (except So Car) have over a dozen conference titles. Things have changed tremendously in the past 15 years - just based on those 15 team above.
    That list is also using a VERY small sample size. Doing well over that time period does NOT make you a Top 20 program. Sustain it for 20 years and then you can talk. I still say the more things change the more they stay the same.

  3. #63
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,898
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg View Post
    That list is also using a VERY small sample size. Doing well over that time period does NOT make you a Top 20 program. Sustain it for 20 years and then you can talk. I still say the more things change the more they stay the same.
    The landscape has changed. What you have done the last 10-15 years is much more indicative of what your place in college football will be going forward than what you did pre 2000.

  4. #64
    Senior Member BrunswickDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Home of Slay, GA
    Posts
    11,982
    vCash
    1746501
    Quote Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg View Post
    That list is also using a VERY small sample size. Doing well over that time period does NOT make you a Top 20 program. Sustain it for 20 years and then you can talk. I still say the more things change the more they stay the same.
    Yes - the CFP era is a short span, but that doesn't discount the changes that have happened over the course of the BCS/CFP era. The money and exposure drastically changed many school's ability to compete - including MSU.
    The fact that in a 4 year span none of the traditional programs I listed show up in the Top 25 is a prime illustration of that change
    If you look at this list - how many of them would you have placed ahead of MSU over the past 4 years if you were just guessing based off tradition?

    Nebraska - 5 National Titles across a 30 year span, 53 bowl games, 46 conference titles, 893 wins
    UCLA - 1 National Title, 17 conference titles, 36 bowl games, 577 wins
    Texas - 4 National Titles across 3 decades, 53 Bowl games, 32 conference titles, 897 wins
    Miami - 5 National Titles across 3 decades, 39 Bowl games, 9 conf. titles, 623 wins
    Tennessee - 6 National Titles across 5 decades, 52 Bowl games, 16 conference titles, 833 wins
    Texas A&M - 3 National Titles across 3 decades, 38 Bowl Games, 18 conference titles, 732 wins
    Arkansas - 1 National Title, 42 bowl games, 13 conference titles, 701 wins
    GT - 4 National Titles spanning 70 years, 44 bowls, 16 conference titles, 728 wins
    Va Tech - 10 conference titles, 31 bowls, 738 wins
    West VA- 15 conference titles, 36 bowls, 744 wins
    Colorado - 1 national title, 28 bowls, 27 conference titles, 694 wins
    Minnesota - 7 national titles across 60 years, 19 bowls, 18 conference titles, 688 wins
    Wisconsin - 29 bowl games, 14 conference titles, 697 wins
    BYU - 1 National Title, 35 bowl games, 23 conference titles, 568 wins
    S. Carolina - 1 Conference title, 22 bowls, 602 wins

    Fact is over the past 4 years - and really 9 years more than likely - we have out performed a large number of traditional powers.
    "After dealing with Ole Miss for over a year," he said, "I've learned to expect their leadership to do and say things that the leadership at other Division I schools would never consider doing and to justify their actions by reminding themselves that "We're Ole Miss.""
    - Tom Mars, Esq. 4.9.18

  5. #65
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    19,808
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by confucius say View Post
    The landscape has changed. What you have done the last 10-15 years is much more indicative of what your place in college football will be going forward than what you did pre 2000.
    I hope so, sort of. If that's what Bama is going to do we all just need to quit.

  6. #66
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    19,808
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by BrunswickDawg View Post
    Yes - the CFP era is a short span, but that doesn't discount the changes that have happened over the course of the BCS/CFP era. The money and exposure drastically changed many school's ability to compete - including MSU.
    The fact that in a 4 year span none of the traditional programs I listed show up in the Top 25 is a prime illustration of that change
    If you look at this list - how many of them would you have placed ahead of MSU over the past 4 years if you were just guessing based off tradition?

    Nebraska - 5 National Titles across a 30 year span, 53 bowl games, 46 conference titles, 893 wins
    UCLA - 1 National Title, 17 conference titles, 36 bowl games, 577 wins
    Texas - 4 National Titles across 3 decades, 53 Bowl games, 32 conference titles, 897 wins
    Miami - 5 National Titles across 3 decades, 39 Bowl games, 9 conf. titles, 623 wins
    Tennessee - 6 National Titles across 5 decades, 52 Bowl games, 16 conference titles, 833 wins
    Texas A&M - 3 National Titles across 3 decades, 38 Bowl Games, 18 conference titles, 732 wins
    Arkansas - 1 National Title, 42 bowl games, 13 conference titles, 701 wins
    GT - 4 National Titles spanning 70 years, 44 bowls, 16 conference titles, 728 wins
    Va Tech - 10 conference titles, 31 bowls, 738 wins
    West VA- 15 conference titles, 36 bowls, 744 wins
    Colorado - 1 national title, 28 bowls, 27 conference titles, 694 wins
    Minnesota - 7 national titles across 60 years, 19 bowls, 18 conference titles, 688 wins
    Wisconsin - 29 bowl games, 14 conference titles, 697 wins
    BYU - 1 National Title, 35 bowl games, 23 conference titles, 568 wins
    S. Carolina - 1 Conference title, 22 bowls, 602 wins

    Fact is over the past 4 years - and really 9 years more than likely - we have out performed a large number of traditional powers.
    If you go back and look at the post war Final AP polls they basically look a lot like they do now. There will be the flash in the pans, the rise and falls with coaches, a few powered that have dropped, and a very few new powers, and the same group of about 20 or so that you keep seeing again and again. That last group may take a few years off every now and then, but they usually return after a while. I seriously doubt that changes much. What we have to shoot for is being the next FSU type. I think we do have a shot, because our situation in the past has been somewhat unique. Very few schools in that situation ever escape......but we may have already done it. I'm not talking about just sports either. Oklahoma State And VPI might be the only other real examples.

  7. #67
    Senior Member deadheaddawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,248
    vCash
    3100
    Only 2 teams had lower football budgets than us in 2017 (Missouri and vandy). You can win with smaller budgets, but it does make it harder. We are definitely at a disadvantage money wise. Being in the SEC helps, so 12th in the SEC isn't like 12th everywhere else, but there are more than 20 total teams ahead of us.

    Just got to keep making good hires if needed. And the good news is, If we continue to we can move up a few of spots on the revenue list
    Last edited by deadheaddawg; 05-09-2018 at 07:49 PM.

  8. #68
    Senior Member DanDority's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Realville
    Posts
    1,483
    vCash
    109693
    No to O.P.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.