Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 81 to 91 of 91

Thread: Next Year?s Rotation

  1. #81
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30,023
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by Covercorner2 View Post
    Didn't Kegler, Holman, and Herard all start last year?
    minutes per game last year:

    Q- 31.9
    Peters- 24.6
    Kegler- 28.2
    IJ- 28.6

    Holman- 23.3
    Herard- 18.6

    Herard didnt even play half the time last year.
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  2. #82
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,276
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    minutes per game last year:

    Q- 31.9
    Peters- 24.6
    Kegler- 28.2
    IJ- 28.6

    Holman- 23.3
    Herard- 18.6

    Herard didnt even play half the time last year.
    I thought we were talking starting lineups and players on the floor at the same time, not best players/minutes per game.

  3. #83
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30,023
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by Covercorner2 View Post
    I thought we were talking starting lineups and players on the floor at the same time, not best players/minutes per game.
    I thought we were talking about who played where- and obviously when you look at minutes- Q played mostly the 3 last year
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  4. #84
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    Nick is a phenomenal defensive player. Like top 5-10 in all of college basketball elite defensively at his position. He stays in the starting lineup for this reason alone.

  5. #85
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,116
    vCash
    3700
    Write it down. The Spoons, LAMAR, Ado and Al's Boy. Holman as the,6th man. Why is this hard to see?

  6. #86
    Senior Member Bulldog1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    5,061
    vCash
    3978
    Quote Originally Posted by tcdog70 View Post
    Write it down. The Spoons, LAMAR, Ado and Al's Boy. Holman as the,6th man. Why is this hard to see?
    I say the same. I prefer Perry starting over X myself.

  7. #87
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    3,795
    vCash
    3100
    Guys the important thing isn't whether Z player should start over Y player, its that we have 2 good players competing for the same spot! Regardless of who wins what spot, unless Perry and Woodard are extremely overrated we will have a damn good 2 deep at every spot. Who wins 60% of the minutes doesn't matter, as either way we'll have a very good player o nthe court.

    Give it an off season, let Howland experiment in early non-con play, and then we can argue over what's the best lineup. But right now, we have no idea. Yes X has been playing great, but he's very emotional and may regress again. yes Perry is a 5 star, but sometimes players don't live up to the hype right away. etc etc. You can make an argument for or against any lineup right now, but we haven't seen half of these guys so it's hard to say who's better than who

    The important thing is though, that we can feel pretty confident either way that the guys earning minutes will be damn good, and we have good backups behind them.

  8. #88
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    Quote Originally Posted by the_real_MSU_is_us View Post
    Guys the important thing isn't whether Z player should start over Y player, its that we have 2 good players competing for the same spot! Regardless of who wins what spot, unless Perry and Woodard are extremely overrated we will have a damn good 2 deep at every spot. Who wins 60% of the minutes doesn't matter, as either way we'll have a very good player o nthe court.

    Give it an off season, let Howland experiment in early non-con play, and then we can argue over what's the best lineup. But right now, we have no idea. Yes X has been playing great, but he's very emotional and may regress again. yes Perry is a 5 star, but sometimes players don't live up to the hype right away. etc etc. You can make an argument for or against any lineup right now, but we haven't seen half of these guys so it's hard to say who's better than who

    The important thing is though, that we can feel pretty confident either way that the guys earning minutes will be damn good, and we have good backups behind them.
    Excellent post /end thread

  9. #89
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,242
    vCash
    3100
    I think it will be the deepest and most talented team we've ever had. Yes, even over the 96 & 2004 teams.

  10. #90
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,073
    vCash
    10439
    Do you guys think with the depth we have coming in for the frontcourt that we press more next season? I really think pressing could be beneficial to us with how athletic we are. This season we could not do it much bc no depth for bigs

  11. #91
    Senior Member Bulldog1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    5,061
    vCash
    3978
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Do you guys think with the depth we have coming in for the frontcourt that we press more next season? I really think pressing could be beneficial to us with how athletic we are. This season we could not do it much bc no depth for bigs
    We would benefit from it, no doubt. But Howland isn’t a big fan of it except in the last minute or so. I know we all blamed that ref for the Missouri loss, and rightly so, but if we keep pressing in OT, we win by 10.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.