Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 90

Thread: Rosebowl vs OM: Who 'won"?

  1. #41
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,451
    vCash
    3700
    Oh- and I forgot that they are on repeat violator status for I think five years so that is going to hurt a lot of their tactics as well.

  2. #42
    General Public Political Hack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    General Public
    Posts
    17,288
    vCash
    7178
    Quote Originally Posted by cujo View Post
    It?s been 60 days since punishments were handed out
    Not sure. They probably have to review the game logs and see who played during which games and then vacate if they had ineligible players on the field. I suspect it?ll be almos entire seasons, but given the NCAA?s lack of grit, they may just apologize and award them an extra sugar bowl title.

  3. #43
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,451
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg View Post
    They were the first ones we know about. My guess is Ole Miss knew all along. They got rid of him to appease the NCAA.
    If they wanted to "appease the NCAA" they would have fired him after the Sugar Bowl win.

    What Ole Miss is really trying to avoid is a massive sex scandal for buying prostitutes for players. Ask Penn State and now Michigan State how that goes over with the NCAA. And neither of those two programs were being investigated before the sex scandals started. And that's why they need to be very nice to Tom Mars.

  4. #44
    Senior Member Turfdawg67's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    4,880
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by confucius say View Post
    It doesn?t matter if they had 10, 15, or 20 level 1s. A case as a whole is categorized as level 1,2, or 3 against an institution, and the institution is penalized according to the matrix. You don?t get level 1 penalties for every level 1 infraction. That?s what we didn?t understand, self included, and you still don?t. The committees report states that clearly.

    I didn?t say Half a recruiting class this year. I said half a recruiting class. They will lose half a recruiting class over three years. Every d1 coach in America will tell you that is a huge deal.
    Hell... then Mullen had us on probation without the NCAA.

  5. #45
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    19,808
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    If they wanted to "appease the NCAA" they would have fired him after the Sugar Bowl win.

    What Ole Miss is really trying to avoid is a massive sex scandal for buying prostitutes for players. Ask Penn State and now Michigan State how that goes over with the NCAA. And neither of those two programs were being investigated before the sex scandals started. And that's why they need to be very nice to Tom Mars.
    I agree, but they held on to him as long as they thought it was tenable. When it became obvious that it wasn't anymore, they cut him loose. It was pretty convenient that that stuff came to light when it did. I don't believe in that kind of coincidence.

  6. #46
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    6,849
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Political Hack View Post
    Steve wants money and to feed his ego. Same thing he wanted when State was under investigation. He got hits and money both times. By my account he?s winning personally and professionally at the expense of State fans, but that seems his business. And I?ll readily admit he?s good at it. Kudos are well deserved.

    Unfortunately, Ole Miss skated. They sure as shit didn?t ?win? anything though. Losing scholarships, past wins vacated, head coach gone, reputation tarnished with the local and national media, Mars 3 feet up their arse, and a bowl ban and money gone to boot. Should they have gotten more? Absolutely. Did they ?win?? Not even close.
    Have they or the NCAA published a list of the games vacated or is there somewhere on the net you can go to see such info? I have seen or heard nothing.

  7. #47
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,451
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg View Post
    I agree, but they held on to him as long as they thought it was tenable. When it became obvious that it wasn't anymore, they cut him loose. It was pretty convenient that that stuff came to light when it did. I don't believe in that kind of coincidence.
    They kept him because:

    1. He was winning. (First Sugar Bowl is fity years!)

    2. Maybe even more importantly to them- he was recruiting. And recruiting the way that they want to.

    3. The whole plan all along was to lie to recruits and make them believe that they weren't being investigated and then later that they weren't going on probation. It's kind of hard to make that lie when you just immediately fire your Sugar Bowl winning coach, no? The reason that they wanted to lie was because their plan was to recruit at a high level and hope that the really good players keep them afloat through probation. That's not going to happen like they wanted to. And honestly a lot of that is because they had to get rid of Freeze. The crazy thing assuming the penalties are the same regardless of whether Freeze was still there or not- it would have worked. The thing we'll never know is what the penalties would have been had Freeze stayed on because I suspect that they would have been hit harder.

    So, I think Ole Miss really wanted Freeze to stay as long as possible. I don't think they wanted to fire him at all. In fact I wouldn't be surprised at all if they bring him back to replace Luke. If they wanted to conveniently fire him- he went 5-7 with an Egg Bowl loss and had the program under investigation. That would be the more ideal and more convenient time to do it than August when fall camp is starting. They were forced to because they don't want to the FBI sniffing around Oxford because they know that being the school that bought prostitutes for football recruits is SMU level notorious. Whether they get the death penalty or not. I don't know very many parents that would send their sons to a school that was known for doing that.

  8. #48
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,451
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Goldendawg View Post
    Have they or the NCAA published a list of the games vacated or is there somewhere on the net you can go to see such info? I have seen or heard nothing.
    I bet they quietly release it in their media guide.

  9. #49
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    218
    vCash
    3200

    Please announce it loudly here

    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    I bet they quietly release it in their media guide.
    Especially if it includes egg bowls 12,14, &15

  10. #50
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    77
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    If they wanted to "appease the NCAA" they would have fired him after the Sugar Bowl win.

    What Ole Miss is really trying to avoid is a massive sex scandal for buying prostitutes for players. Ask Penn State and now Michigan State how that goes over with the NCAA. And neither of those two programs were being investigated before the sex scandals started. And that's why they need to be very nice to Tom Mars.
    This!!!!!!

  11. #51
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    4,215
    vCash
    3100
    Ole Miss knew all along that Hugh was making the calls.... it is part of their compliance departments job to compare phone logs with phone bills....any irregularities would be vetted by compliance.

  12. #52
    Senior Member yjnkdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    5,049
    vCash
    3287
    Quote Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg View Post
    They were the first ones we know about. My guess is Ole Miss knew all along. They got rid of him to appease the NCAA.

    Possibly, but I think Mars let Lee Tyner, the Birmingham Law Firm, or both, know that this was just the beginning and things could get a lot worse for OM. I highly doubt the powers to be of the OM football program would have fired Freeze unless it got down to a have to situation. The powers to be are not those two other guys who sat at the table with Freeze or sat at the table by themselves when Freeze was not there.

  13. #53
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    19,808
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeshouldveflanked View Post
    Ole Miss knew all along that Hugh was making the calls.... it is part of their compliance departments job to compare phone logs with phone bills....any irregularities would be vetted by compliance.
    Exactly. Those calls had to have been known about. They didn’t care, till they did.

  14. #54
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Flowood
    Posts
    3,215
    vCash
    3100
    I don't believe for one second we will see anything about the prostitutes for recruits scandal or that the NCAA will do anything about it

  15. #55
    Senior Member yjnkdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    5,049
    vCash
    3287
    I think OM won because when you read all of the documented evidence concerning the vast patterns of violations over a period of time, that OM had, and with the new matrix in place, they could have been basically buried. It appears the NCAA did their work, but the COI dropped the ball and let OM slide ( or in some of our thinking anyway). If so, could somebody have gotten to the COI? Could it have been the SEC Office intervened, or some very influential person or persons in the OM family? That Bama law firm is one of the best in dealing with matters such as this. That book is closed as was already mentioned so we will never know why the COI made the decision they did.
    Last edited by yjnkdawg; 02-04-2018 at 11:17 AM.

  16. #56
    Senior Member yjnkdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    5,049
    vCash
    3287
    Quote Originally Posted by Activated Alpha View Post
    I don't believe for one second we will see anything about the prostitutes for recruits scandal or that the NCAA will do anything about it

    If Freeze hadn't been fired, I bet we would have, but I don't think it would been Bjork releasing the information. I think it is a good thing for OM that Nutt and Mars were finally satisfied.
    Last edited by yjnkdawg; 02-04-2018 at 11:25 AM.

  17. #57
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    261
    vCash
    3200
    #
    Last edited by spbdawg; 11-26-2018 at 01:52 PM.

  18. #58
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    261
    vCash
    3200
    #
    Last edited by spbdawg; 11-27-2018 at 10:31 AM.

  19. #59
    Super Moderator BeastMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    7,504
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by yjnkdawg View Post
    I think OM won because when you read all of the documented evidence concerning the vast patterns of violations over a period of time, that OM had, and with the new matrix in place, they could have been basically buried. It appears the NCAA did their work, but the COI dropped the ball and let OM slide ( or in some of our thinking anyway). If so, could somebody have gotten to the COI? Could it have been the SEC Office intervened, or some very influential person or persons in the OM family? That Bama law firm is one of the best in dealing with matters such as this. That book is closed as was already mentioned so we will never know why the COI made the decision they did.
    This is a strong argument

  20. #60
    Senior Member yjnkdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    5,049
    vCash
    3287
    Quote Originally Posted by spbdawg View Post
    Why not? All Tom Mars did was make a public records request...something any American can do. The statute of limitations on these offenses has a very long fuse.

    Well for one thing, Mars knew what he was doing and then he also brought a specialist in who is an expert in this type of investigative work. They were able to go deeper, in what lies in those phone records, than the normal person. I would imagine. But anyway, who is going to pursue this? The NCAA apparently could care less, or they are being told to care less?
    Last edited by yjnkdawg; 02-04-2018 at 01:50 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.