Disassociated Boosters Reinstated

[msstate7]

Here is what I wish would happen with the NCAA:

I simply want them to have to answer questions. There appears to be no accountability for how they rule because no one can ask questions.

After each infractions case, there should be a conference call where the chairman of the COI has to answer questions that pertain to precedent, guidlines, etc.

I would be fascinated to hear the reasoning of how the COI dodged the penalty matrix & gave OM less than 1 schollie reduction per level 1 violation. I want to know their reasons, methods, & how the decisions they made in this case will effect future cases.

Can future schools expect less than 1 schollie reduction per level 1 violation?

What is the precedent that has been set here?

The OM fans kept calling the NCAA a kangaroo court but in many ways it is due to the lack of transparency, accountability, and consistency of the COI

Good luck with that. I have always wanted refs (esp pro) to be required to answer questions to the press postgame, but it will not happen

[ShotgunDawg]

Good luck with that. I have always wanted refs (esp pro) to be required to answer questions to the press postgame, but it will not happen

I hear you, but from a process & accountability standpoint, I view the COI as a court that should be objective & officiating as something that should be more subjective.

We can vote judges in & out of office & they are further held accountable by the political party in which the represent. Who hold the COI accountable?

[Todd4State]

I hear you, but from a process & accountability standpoint, I view the COI as a court that should be objective & officiating as something that should be more subjective.

We can vote judges in & out of office & they are further held accountable by the political party in which the represent. Who hold the COI accountable?

Well, what could get interesting is if Leo and Mars sue Warren. Nothing might come out of it but then again...