Fabian decommits and commits to tcu.

[Commercecomet24]

I don't think anything that has happened surprise Coach Moorhead in the slightless.

I agree. Had to make some room anyway and I?m sure Coach JoMo may have a trick or to up his sleeve.

[Really Clark?]

Also, if you read the article on Reed's decommittment, he states Moorhead told him straight the situation we have with numbers and that the previous staff took too many. We have to subtract right now to add to the program

[Commercecomet24]

Also, if you read the article on Reed's decommittment, he states Moorhead told him straight the situation we have with numbers and that the previous staff took too many. We have to subtract right now to add to the program

Exactly. If you studied the numbers one could?ve seen this coming. It?s why I?m not melting I knew we would have to have some ?market correction?.

[msstate7]

Lol. Figures

Fabien Lovett... I think I can justify this mistake... for once

[ShotgunDawg]

Fabien Lovett... I think I can justify this mistake... for once

[Doggie_Style]

....just need to "make Some Room'!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbipVP_aMpQ

[msstate7]

You only get one mistake......

I would have been banned after my first 5 posts haha

[Leeshouldveflanked]

We only got around 20 spots open... we have 20 commits and confidence is high on adding Keyton's 2 buddies and an OL, so unless we do some processing you may see 2-3 more decommitted..

[ShotgunDawg]

We only got around 20 spots open... we have 20 commits and confidence is high on adding Keyton's 2 buddies and an OL, so unless we do some processing you may see 2-3 more decommitted..

When do we have to be down to the 85 limit by?

If not till the Fall, then couldn't you just cut some dudes after the Spring?

[Really Clark?]

When do we have to be down to the 85 limit by?

If not till the Fall, then couldn't you just cut some dudes after the Spring?

The issue is the prior staff was going to process multiple (4-6 players possibly) but Moorhead (which I agree with his thought process) is given players already in school a "clean-slate". He wants and needs to see them in a full spring setting. Some players may take to his or Shoops system much better and be good contributors. But in order to do that we have to be careful with our signing numbers.

[Dawg61]

[ShotgunDawg]

Haha. That’s awful

[DownwardDawg]

Hahahahaha!!!! Outstanding!!!!!

[Commercecomet24]

That?s awesome!

[Commercecomet24]

The issue is the prior staff was going to process multiple (4-6 players possibly) but Moorhead (which I agree with his thought process) is given players already in school a "clean-slate". He wants and needs to see them in a full spring setting. Some players may take to his or Shoops system much better and be good contributors. But in order to do that we have to be careful with our signing numbers.

Yep he?s definitely taking the right approach to this imo.

[GoDawgz]

He was kinda overshadowed in the State Championship game against Point City, by some kid named Murphy................. -9yds vs 226yds. We are ok.

[Commercecomet24]

He was kinda overshadowed in the State Championship game against Point City, by some kid named Murphy................. -9yds vs 226yds. We are ok.

I'm excited about Murphy, he seems vastly underrated.

[sandwolf]

Haha, that gif lasts like 2.5 minutes....

[Todd4State]

I'm excited about Murphy, he seems vastly underrated.

I don't understand it. He's probably going to win Mississippi POY.

[1bigdawg]

Yeah. He won?t qualify.

Odd for him to decommit though. Not sure what his gain is.

We can only sign 25 so perhaps we simply didn?t have room to sign him.

Numbers are not an issue. We can sign as man as we want. We just hav to stay under 85 in the fall. We could sign 10 non qualifiers and it would make no difference in our numbers.