-
Originally Posted by
Really Clark?
I don't think anything that has happened surprise Coach Moorhead in the slightless.
I agree. Had to make some room anyway and I?m sure Coach JoMo may have a trick or to up his sleeve.
-
Also, if you read the article on Reed's decommittment, he states Moorhead told him straight the situation we have with numbers and that the previous staff took too many. We have to subtract right now to add to the program
-
Originally Posted by
Really Clark?
Also, if you read the article on Reed's decommittment, he states Moorhead told him straight the situation we have with numbers and that the previous staff took too many. We have to subtract right now to add to the program
Exactly. If you studied the numbers one could?ve seen this coming. It?s why I?m not melting I knew we would have to have some ?market correction?.
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
Lol. Figures
Fabien Lovett... I think I can justify this mistake... for once
-
Originally Posted by
msstate7
Fabien Lovett... I think I can justify this mistake... for once
-
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
You only get one mistake......
I would have been banned after my first 5 posts haha
-
We only got around 20 spots open... we have 20 commits and confidence is high on adding Keyton's 2 buddies and an OL, so unless we do some processing you may see 2-3 more decommitted..
-
Originally Posted by
Leeshouldveflanked
We only got around 20 spots open... we have 20 commits and confidence is high on adding Keyton's 2 buddies and an OL, so unless we do some processing you may see 2-3 more decommitted..
When do we have to be down to the 85 limit by?
If not till the Fall, then couldn't you just cut some dudes after the Spring?
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
When do we have to be down to the 85 limit by?
If not till the Fall, then couldn't you just cut some dudes after the Spring?
The issue is the prior staff was going to process multiple (4-6 players possibly) but Moorhead (which I agree with his thought process) is given players already in school a "clean-slate". He wants and needs to see them in a full spring setting. Some players may take to his or Shoops system much better and be good contributors. But in order to do that we have to be careful with our signing numbers.
-
-
Originally Posted by
Dawg61
Haha. That’s awful
-
Originally Posted by
Dawg61
Hahahahaha!!!! Outstanding!!!!!
-
Originally Posted by
Dawg61
That?s awesome!
-
Originally Posted by
Really Clark?
The issue is the prior staff was going to process multiple (4-6 players possibly) but Moorhead (which I agree with his thought process) is given players already in school a "clean-slate". He wants and needs to see them in a full spring setting. Some players may take to his or Shoops system much better and be good contributors. But in order to do that we have to be careful with our signing numbers.
Yep he?s definitely taking the right approach to this imo.
-
He was kinda overshadowed in the State Championship game against Point City, by some kid named Murphy................. -9yds vs 226yds. We are ok.
Love All Worship One!
Go Dawgz!
-
Originally Posted by
GoDawgz
He was kinda overshadowed in the State Championship game against Point City, by some kid named Murphy................. -9yds vs 226yds. We are ok.
I'm excited about Murphy, he seems vastly underrated.
-
Originally Posted by
Dawg61
Haha, that gif lasts like 2.5 minutes....
-
Originally Posted by
Commercecomet24
I'm excited about Murphy, he seems vastly underrated.
I don't understand it. He's probably going to win Mississippi POY.
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
Yeah. He won?t qualify.
Odd for him to decommit though. Not sure what his gain is.
We can only sign 25 so perhaps we simply didn?t have room to sign him.
Numbers are not an issue. We can sign as man as we want. We just hav to stay under 85 in the fall. We could sign 10 non qualifiers and it would make no difference in our numbers.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.