-
Interested in your thoughts on the tax change for ticket donations
http://www.espn.com/college-sports/s...g-new-tax-plan
I don't think it will prevent many people from donating but in a down season in athletics it could hurt.
This ain't a liberal or conservative thing either before you yahoos go there.
Death penalty or bust!!!***
-
The place where the house bill will harm the University the most is what it will do to Graduate/Doctoral students. It makes it so that the tuition waivers that the students receive in exchange for doing graduate research and teaching classes counts as taxable income. This means that while they might be getting paid (ballpark numbers) $20k/yr plus free tuition, they will now be getting taxed like they're earning $40k/yr while still only receiving $20k in income. This will crush the graduate programs of higher tuition private schools and will ruin the chance of going to grad school without taking on six figures in debt for lower income students.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/16/o...-students.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/16/hous...0-percent.html
https://www.npr.org/2017/11/14/56387...ssive-tax-hike
Seriously guys, it's a University killer.
-
Originally Posted by
BulldogDX55
The place where the house bill will harm the University the most is what it will do to Graduate/Doctoral students. It makes it so that the tuition waivers that the students receive in exchange for doing graduate research and teaching classes counts as taxable income. This means that while they might be getting paid (ballpark numbers) $20k/yr plus free tuition, they will now be getting taxed like they're earning $40k/yr while still only receiving $20k in income. This will crush the graduate programs of higher tuition private schools and will ruin the chance of going to grad school without taking on six figures in debt for lower income students.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/16/o...-students.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/16/hous...0-percent.html
https://www.npr.org/2017/11/14/56387...ssive-tax-hike
Seriously guys, it's a University killer.
We could probably use a few less private institutions....
-
Originally Posted by
BulldogDX55
The place where the house bill will harm the University the most is what it will do to Graduate/Doctoral students. It makes it so that the tuition waivers that the students receive in exchange for doing graduate research and teaching classes counts as taxable income. This means that while they might be getting paid (ballpark numbers) $20k/yr plus free tuition, they will now be getting taxed like they're earning $40k/yr while still only receiving $20k in income. This will crush the graduate programs of higher tuition private schools and will ruin the chance of going to grad school without taking on six figures in debt for lower income students.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/16/o...-students.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/16/hous...0-percent.html
https://www.npr.org/2017/11/14/56387...ssive-tax-hike
Seriously guys, it's a University killer.
Yeah, there is no way I could have afforded to pay taxes on my GA. Tuition, Room, Meal Plan and a small stipend for 2 years was more than my first salary when I finished grad school (warning to parents - History degrees don't pay off instantly).
I don't think Tax Reform will get done anyway. It will blow up in the Senate just like Healthcare.
-
Member
If they double the standard deduction, lower the tax rates, this will likely be a wash for a grad assistant/student. Has anyone truly done the math? The net difference is big for all.
-
Originally Posted by
TheDawgBiscuit
If they double the standard deduction, lower the tax rates, this will likely be a wash for a grad assistant/student. Has anyone truly done the math? The net difference is big for all.
Yeah. A lot of people. It would be a 300-400% tax increase for grad students. Luckily Senate Republicans have recognized that and are trying to offset that in their bill. Hopefully the House will be ok with that, should it make it to conference.
-
Originally Posted by
TheDawgBiscuit
If they double the standard deduction, lower the tax rates, this will likely be a wash for a grad assistant/student. Has anyone truly done the math? The net difference is big for all.
Don't you mean, "Has anyone who worked on this bill done the math?"
-
Originally Posted by
BulldogDX55
The place where the house bill will harm the University the most is what it will do to Graduate/Doctoral students. It makes it so that the tuition waivers that the students receive in exchange for doing graduate research and teaching classes counts as taxable income. This means that while they might be getting paid (ballpark numbers) $20k/yr plus free tuition, they will now be getting taxed like they're earning $40k/yr while still only receiving $20k in income. This will crush the graduate programs of higher tuition private schools and will ruin the chance of going to grad school without taking on six figures in debt for lower income students.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/16/o...-students.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/16/hous...0-percent.html
https://www.npr.org/2017/11/14/56387...ssive-tax-hike
Seriously guys, it's a University killer.
Not to hijack this thread, but I'm terrified by this. I'm a grad student at a school where tuition is 45k a year.
-
Originally Posted by
bostondawg
Not to hijack this thread, but I'm terrified by this. I'm a grad student at a school where tuition is 45k a year.
You'd better hurry up. We don't like education in these United States of America.
-
Originally Posted by
Political Hack
You'd better hurry up. We don't like education in these United States of America.
Haha I'm trying. Two more years *fingers crossed* for the PhD. Maybe they'll delay putting the tax bill into effect and I'll not have to go bankrupt.
-
Originally Posted by
BulldogDX55
The place where the house bill will harm the University the most is what it will do to Graduate/Doctoral students. It makes it so that the tuition waivers that the students receive in exchange for doing graduate research and teaching classes counts as taxable income. This means that while they might be getting paid (ballpark numbers) $20k/yr plus free tuition, they will now be getting taxed like they're earning $40k/yr while still only receiving $20k in income. This will crush the graduate programs of higher tuition private schools and will ruin the chance of going to grad school without taking on six figures in debt for lower income students.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/16/o...-students.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/16/hous...0-percent.html
https://www.npr.org/2017/11/14/56387...ssive-tax-hike
Seriously guys, it's a University killer.
So tuition waivers will be treated just like the more common type of "tuition waiver" - the scholarship?
Last edited by MadDawg; 11-17-2017 at 10:41 AM.
-
Originally Posted by
MadDawg
So tuition waivers will be treated just like the more common type of "tuition waiver" - the scholarship?
No.
Scholarships are actually funded - usually through an endowment of some kind. The dividend off that endowment actually pays the university for the recipient of the scholarship. GA's are providing a service to the university in lieu of a salary. Typically, those GA positions are not endowed although in some cases they are.
To me, the scarier thing is that if this passes, the next step is to start classifying scholarships as income that will be subject to taxes.
-
Originally Posted by
BrunswickDawg
No.
Scholarships are actually funded - usually through an endowment of some kind. The dividend off that endowment actually pays the university for the recipient of the scholarship. GA's are providing a service to the university in lieu of a salary. Typically, those GA positions are not endowed although in some cases they are.
To me, the scarier thing is that if this passes, the next step is to start classifying scholarships as income that will be subject to taxes.
Scholarships already are treated as income if they are more than tuition, books and fees.
-
Originally Posted by
MadDawg
Scholarships already are treated as income if they are more than tuition, books and fees.
I wouldn't mind the government treating teacher salaries for government funded schools as tax free. It might create an advantage to get better teachers in the profession. Too many well qualified teachers don't do it because the pay is so low. My sister in law knows a great teacher that just loves kids, she probably doesn't even make minimum wage after the money she spends on kids who don't have anything. We have politicians spending money like it doesn't matter while teachers are taking their pay and buying toilet paper and pencils for their kids. There is a huge problem with how the United States politicians treat our country as a whole. I don't care what side of the isle you are on, it is all screwed up. Politicians have great healthcare and pay for life. That wasn't what the founding fathers dreamed when they created the Constitution.
-
Originally Posted by
MadDawg
Scholarships already are treated as income if they are more than tuition, books and fees.
And that is rare. Most scholarships cover some costs, no where near all.
-
I have never claimed my contribution to the bulldog club. I just figure it's part of the ticket price.
-
Originally Posted by
Leeshouldveflanked
We could probably use a few less private institutions....
Yeah! Let?s destroy some top end research institutions because reasons! Great idea!
-
Agree with the change
Originally Posted by
Reason2succeed
why should i pay for some people to have nice seats at a sporting event? Also why should i pay for parks, libraries, and sanctuary services for east and west coast states? The school will figure out a way to find the money as will the liberal states.....if they really need to find something to spend it on.
-
Originally Posted by
Apoplectic
why should i pay for some people to have nice seats at a sporting event? Also why should i pay for parks, libraries, and sanctuary services for east and west coast states? The school will figure out a way to find the money as will the liberal states.....if they really need to find something to spend it on.
Uhh, first of all this really isn’t a left right issue but you just had to go there. Learn to read. Byrne from Alabama and Alexander from LSU are two of the ADs complaining about this. Dang liberals from the east and west coast (of Mississippi).***
Death penalty or bust!!!***
-
Originally Posted by
Reason2succeed
Uhh, first of all this really isn?t a left right issue but you just had to go there. Learn to read. Byrne from Alabama and Alexander from LSU are two of the ADs complaining about this. Dang liberals from the east and west coast (of Mississippi).***
Maybe BAMA and LSU should make some cuts in their Athletic Budget...
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.