Results 1 to 20 of 70

Thread: Interested in your thoughts on the tax change for ticket donations

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    1,721
    vCash
    3671
    Quote Originally Posted by Apoplectic View Post
    why should i pay for some people to have nice seats at a sporting event? Also why should i pay for parks, libraries, and sanctuary services for east and west coast states? The school will figure out a way to find the money as will the liberal states.....if they really need to find something to spend it on.
    No one tell him that those dagum liberals in other states subsidize a ton of Mississippi's programs. Seriously, Mississippi relies on the federal government more than nearly almost every other state. For every dollar that Mississippi sends to the federal government, the fed sends back 3. Without those park-needing and library-needing east and west coast states, Mississippi would still be in the stone age.



    Source: https://www.theatlantic.com/business...takers/361668/

  2. #2
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,772
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by bostondawg View Post
    No one tell him that those dagum liberals in other states subsidize a ton of Mississippi's programs. Seriously, Mississippi relies on the federal government more than nearly almost every other state. For every dollar that Mississippi sends to the federal government, the fed sends back 3. Without those park-needing and library-needing east and west coast states, Mississippi would still be in the stone age.



    Source: https://www.theatlantic.com/business...takers/361668/
    That's very interesting. What the hecks up with South Carolina? That's almost off the charts.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    1,721
    vCash
    3671
    Quote Originally Posted by Commercecomet24 View Post
    That's very interesting. What the hecks up with South Carolina? That's almost off the charts.
    I was actually really shocked to see that too. That's unbelievable. There's something really up with South Carolina. That's a problem.

    Also Florida is a big problem too. I know I'm calling out Mississippi for getting a 3:1 ratio in dollars from the fed, but the MS economy is small. Florida's is massive. So in absolute dollars, we're talking truckloads of cash used to subsidize Florida. If I had to guess, maybe it's because of all of the old people and Medicare?

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    489
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by bostondawg View Post
    I was actually really shocked to see that too. That's unbelievable. There's something really up with South Carolina. That's a problem.

    Also Florida is a big problem too. I know I'm calling out Mississippi for getting a 3:1 ratio in dollars from the fed, but the MS economy is small. Florida's is massive. So in absolute dollars, we're talking truckloads of cash used to subsidize Florida. If I had to guess, maybe it's because of all of the old people and Medicare?
    A lot of military in Florida

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    1,721
    vCash
    3671
    Quote Originally Posted by Hasu Dackds View Post
    A lot of military in Florida
    Good point too. I'm not sure precisely how those dollars are calculated in this chart. For just the generally poor southern states, I think it's just about the poverty rate requiring a lot of food stamps and welfare programs. From the article:

    "Another part of the explanation is easier to discern. The reddest states on that map at the top—Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, New Mexico, Maine—have exceptionally high poverty rates and thus receive disproportionately large shares of federal dollars. Through a variety of social programs, the federal government disburses hundreds of billions of dollars each year to maintain a “safety net” intended to help the neediest among us. Consider, for example, the percentage of each state’s residents who get “food stamps” through the federal government’s SNAP program. This chart tells the story."

  6. #6
    General Public Political Hack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    General Public
    Posts
    17,290
    vCash
    7178
    Quote Originally Posted by Hasu Dackds View Post
    A lot of military in Florida
    Big naval presence in CA too. DOD spending always gets thrown out there but SS and Medicaid/care are the biggest expenditures. We need radical reforms there.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    489
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Political Hack View Post
    Big naval presence in CA too. DOD spending always gets thrown out there but SS and Medicaid/care are the biggest expenditures. We need radical reforms there.
    That might take care of itself. Lot of boomers will be dead in 10-20 years

  8. #8
    Senior Member Tbonewannabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,692
    vCash
    3500
    Quote Originally Posted by Hasu Dackds View Post
    That might take care of itself. Lot of boomers will be dead in 10-20 years
    The biggest issue with Medicaid/care is the government is paying $35 each for damn Tylenol. The 17ing overhead on the shit is outrageous. If you get hurt without insurance then you basically hope they don't let you die in the parking lot after they get you "stabilized". Afterwards you then probably have to file bankruptcy because the bill could be $100,000.

    SS is screwed from the fact that you work your entire life and then draw $250. It is the biggest damn Ponzi scheme in the world.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    19,808
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Political Hack View Post
    Big naval presence in CA too. DOD spending always gets thrown out there but SS and Medicaid/care are the biggest expenditures. We need radical reforms there.
    Last time I looked you could throw out everything but entitlements and interest payments and we still run a deficit. That isn't sustainable.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Tbonewannabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,692
    vCash
    3500
    Quote Originally Posted by Hasu Dackds View Post
    A lot of military in Florida
    South Carolina has a lot of military bases along with Paris Island. I don't know if those drive up those Fed dollars but that is still a lot of money going to the state.

  11. #11
    Senior Member IMissJack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,099
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Hasu Dackds View Post
    A lot of military in Florida
    A lot of retirees that vote in Florida is the answer.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    19,808
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by IMissJack View Post
    A lot of retirees that vote in Florida is the answer.
    Yep

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    19,808
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Hasu Dackds View Post
    A lot of military in Florida
    A lot more old people.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Jack Lambert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    misippi
    Posts
    13,643
    vCash
    2238605444
    Quote Originally Posted by bostondawg View Post
    I was actually really shocked to see that too. That's unbelievable. There's something really up with South Carolina. That's a problem.

    Also Florida is a big problem too. I know I'm calling out Mississippi for getting a 3:1 ratio in dollars from the fed, but the MS economy is small. Florida's is massive. So in absolute dollars, we're talking truckloads of cash used to subsidize Florida. If I had to guess, maybe it's because of all of the old people and Medicare?
    One thing you are forgetting some of the lower receiving federal money states have really high state income tax. The states receiving higher amounts of money from the federal goverment have low state income tax. Why does that matter in this case is because State Income Tax is a write off on you Federal Income Tax. It balances out between all the states. Those state with high income rates are getting their money from their citizens and those citizens are getting their money back from the Federal goverment through the tax write off. The States receiving more from the Federal goverment are getting it directly from the Federal Government.

    It's how the States get their money from the Federal is the only difference.

    However under the new tax bill those state income tax write off are going away but they are doubling the standern deduction. Which suspect will help more people then having itemize write off.
    Last edited by Jack Lambert; 11-17-2017 at 02:02 PM.

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    489
    vCash
    3100
    Look at the states below the 1 dollar mark and those over it. Can we say DEFICIT

  16. #16
    Senior Member fishwater99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    80403
    Posts
    1,833
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by bostondawg View Post
    No one tell him that those dagum liberals in other states subsidize a ton of Mississippi's programs. Seriously, Mississippi relies on the federal government more than nearly almost every other state. For every dollar that Mississippi sends to the federal government, the fed sends back 3. Without those park-needing and library-needing east and west coast states, Mississippi would still be in the stone age.



    Source: https://www.theatlantic.com/business...takers/361668/
    Why is South Carolina getting so much $$?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.