-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
Not typically. With their LBs issues & our OL & Fitz, I could see it working better this year than ever before. Fitz is a better runner than Dak with a better OL
I may tend to think maybe so but, it depends. Probably not if Mullen tries it 3 times in a row from the 9.
-
I think this thread should focus more on the era of Nick Saban rather than Dan Mullen. However someone mentioned the red zone and I became curious...
Year. Red zone. Result
2016. 0
2015. 1. Downs
2014. 6. FG, FG, Int, TD, Int, TD
2013. 3. MFG, TD, Downs
2012. 3. MFG, int, TD
2011. 3. MFG, MFG, TD
2010. 2. FG, TD
2009. 2. MFG, FG
1991 inside the 5, with a chance to the win the game, about 1 min, downs
1981 inside the 10, with a chance to win the game, less 1 min,interception
It isn't just a Mullen problem.
Last edited by Maroonthirteen; 11-08-2017 at 03:10 PM.
-
One good thing about this year. If we get down within their 35 yd line about 7 times, we'll most likely score 21 points *****
-
Originally Posted by
tcdog70
17 THE PAST--Saturday is a new day. this game will be a nut cutter.
A nut cutter huh
-
Originally Posted by
thf24
A lot of this has to do with the fact that this is about the time most teams hit their peak, which translates to an exponentially larger gap for a team with that much talent and depth. We also seem to always get their best game execution-wise, which I'd like to think is a sign of respect for us and the way we play.
If we could have gotten them in week three or four like certain others do just a few times, I think some of the numbers would look different, even if not the win column.
Seems like Bama is always at their peak when we play them.
-
Originally Posted by
Maroonthirteen
I think this thread should focus more on the era of Nick Saban rather than Dan Mullen. However someone mentioned the red zone and I became curious...
Year. Red zone. Result
2016. 0
2015. 1. Downs
2014. 6. FG, FG, Int, TD, Int, TD
2013. 3. MFG, TD, Downs
2012. 3. MFG, int, TD
2011. 3. MFG, MFG, TD
2010. 2. FG, TD
2009. 2. MFG, FG
1991 inside the 5, with a chance to the win the game, about 1 min, downs
1981 inside the 10, with a chance to win the game, less 1 min,interception
It isn't just a Mullen problem.
This is excellent. 2015 & 2016 was Holloway; 2012 & 2013 was Perkins. 2014 was Jrob and the only year we were competitive. Proves that when you play the big RBs, it works. You cant really look at carries but have to look at snaps played. The last two years we gave away the rb threat by playing the small Rb which Bama doesn't have to respect and can key only on qb run. This year, we only have big RBs and auburn & UGA earlier in year proves that Fitz throwing 22+ times will not work. We need to run it with Fitz & Aeris & Kylin & Gibson 80% of the time. Mixon on 4-6 speed sweeps to wind their oversized LBs. Do that & see where the chips fall. We can complete enough short & intermediate passes but have to fire off and run. Also Fitz has to run & pull the option to perfection. There will be ~5 plays if Fitz pulls it properly can house it.
It's not fair to the OL to play small RBs ala 2015.
It's not that Fitz isn't a good passer, but our WRs don't win 50/50 so need to keep the passing attempts down.
We will have the best D they've faced.
Never underestimate homefield advantage in the SEC.
#94 needs to show up. If kimchee can parlay one good game into a 1st round pick then Simmons can to as he's much better player.
It's going to be a great game, better than any of our fans think it will be.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.