Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 44

Thread: What do you think Dan's rationale was for...

  1. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    Quote Originally Posted by HancockCountyDog View Post
    There is a part of me that would be just fine if Milton did transfer. We would have another scholarship available, still be three deep in experienced RB's, and have two capable freshman on the way.

    Its not a slight, I just want to keep the cupboards full.
    Sorry no offense but this is terrible. Milton is way more talented than 50% of the roster. How about giving him a set package of 5-10 plays and have him practice them every day so he is very 17ing good at those 10 plays. Call it the Milton Set or whatever but I'd open my mind to new ideas before I'd let a talented player like Milton go. Maybe if he was being a 17 up off the field but he's caused ZERO PROBLEMS as far as we know. I'd even give him a shot at FB, slot WR/TE, LB, FS/SS before I cut him loose.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    492
    vCash
    3200
    Again, he needs a fair shot at RB before any of those things happen. It sucks but LP's reps need to decrease dramatically until he's healthy...he hasn't looked great.

    As of now it should go like this

    JRob
    Milton
    Shump/Griffin
    Perk

  3. #23
    Senior Member Barking 13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Bulldog Hill, AL
    Posts
    1,843
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by bocfarm View Post
    Again, he needs a fair shot at RB before any of those things happen. It sucks but LP's reps need to decrease dramatically until he's healthy...he hasn't looked great.

    As of now it should go like this

    JRob
    Milton
    Shump/Griffin
    Perk
    With you...

  4. #24
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by bocfarm View Post
    Again, he needs a fair shot at RB before any of those things happen. It sucks but LP's reps need to decrease dramatically until he's healthy...he hasn't looked great.

    As of now it should go like this

    JRob
    Milton
    Shump/Griffin
    Perk
    Agree

  5. #25
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30,335
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawg61 View Post
    Sorry no offense but this is terrible. Milton is way more talented than 50% of the roster. How about giving him a set package of 5-10 plays and have him practice them every day so he is very 17ing good at those 10 plays. Call it the Milton Set or whatever but I'd open my mind to new ideas before I'd let a talented player like Milton go. Maybe if he was being a 17 up off the field but he's caused ZERO PROBLEMS as far as we know. I'd even give him a shot at FB, slot WR/TE, LB, FS/SS before I cut him loose.
    We only have so much time to practice- we dont have time to structure practices for each player to only practice certain plays.
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  6. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    We only have so much time to practice- we dont have time to structure practices for each player to only practice certain plays.
    Then give him the plays to practice on his own. Not mandatory

  7. #27
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30,335
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawg61 View Post
    Then give him the plays to practice on his own. Not mandatory
    I dont think Milton's problem is not knowing the plays- it's fumbling and the fact that Perk and JRob are better than him.
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    492
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    I dont think Milton's problem is not knowing the plays- it's fumbling and the fact that Perk and JRob are better than him.
    Sorry but I disagree on Perk...when healthy he can be a huge threat but he's never been one to break tackles so when you take his speed away he's below ave

  9. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,015
    vCash
    3200
    Milton played a lot late last week but really looked good,

  10. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    4,817
    vCash
    3200
    Since everyone agrees that all our backs "look good," why don't we take a second to actually give our O-line some love for once.

  11. #31
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30,335
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by bocfarm View Post
    Sorry but I disagree on Perk...when healthy he can be a huge threat but he's never been one to break tackles so when you take his speed away he's below ave
    Well, the NFL is planning to draft Perkins- they arent going to draft Milton
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  12. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    492
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    Well, the NFL is planning to draft Perkins- they arent going to draft Milton
    Maybe, but their not drafting him based off this season bc he's hurt and hasn't looked good.

    29 carries for 109yrds (3.8 ave) zero TD's
    Last edited by bocfarm; 09-26-2013 at 11:51 PM.

  13. #33
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    I dont think Milton's problem is not knowing the plays- it's fumbling and the fact that Perk and JRob are better than him.
    He gets in the game with a full playbook. I'm talking about his own mini mini playbook of only 10 plays designed just for him. Use him as a weapon. The feature player for those 10 plays. What can it hurt? It's not like any defense is focused on him when he's in the game. This is 50/50 passes to him and running plays. Just an idea.

  14. #34
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30,335
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawg61 View Post
    He gets in the game with a full playbook. I'm talking about his own mini mini playbook of only 10 plays designed just for him. Use him as a weapon. The feature player for those 10 plays. What can it hurt? It's not like any defense is focused on him when he's in the game. This is 50/50 passes to him and running plays. Just an idea.
    A) you have to run a play in practice at least 15 times in practice before you use it in a game- so you are talking about 150 practice reps for your 3rd string TB. That's not even remotely feasible. There are limits on practice time- you can't have 100 plays to run
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  15. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    661
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Lambert View Post
    With the NFL's three year rule, If I had a kid that could be gone in three (Chris Jones) I would not red shirt them. You are giving a year away.
    Exactly why Saban rarely redshirts

  16. #36
    Senior Member whosyourdawgy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Brandon, MS
    Posts
    1,370
    vCash
    3200
    I don't understand the lack of respect for Milton. When he touches the ball he makes good things happen except for the what one fumble he had? He is a Vick Ballard clone to me. Not just the number.

  17. #37
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,487
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Lambert View Post
    With the NFL's three year rule, If I had a kid that could be gone in three (Chris Jones) I would not red shirt them. You are giving a year away.
    If a player is good enough to leave after 3 years, I think they should be good enough to get significant playing their freshman year. Shump may still do it, but I don't see it yet. Gurley and yeldon got big time playing time with big time rb's already on the roster. Shump has only shown glimpses of potentional and saying he'll leave for nfl after 3 is premature. Chris jones on the other hand is definitely deserving of the hype
    Last edited by msstate7; 09-27-2013 at 08:05 AM.

  18. #38
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,091
    vCash
    3000
    Guys, everyone is preaching to the choir here.

    Milton is a good RB, and no one has suggested our depth at RB is a bad thing.

    A couple have suggested it wouldn't be devastating if he transferred; no one has said we should cut him or that we're better off if he leaves, just that our depth can handle it, and we're constantly bringing in more RBs.

  19. #39
    Senior Member FISHDAWG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Cookeville, TN
    Posts
    5,344
    vCash
    2076120
    if he was that close to Ballard he would be starting, but I'm not totally disagreeing with you. He seems to be our largest RB and in theory, would be better between the tackles than LP- but that just speaks to the talent of J Rob imo

  20. #40
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30,335
    vCash
    17200
    Why do people think Shumpert is a 3 year guy? That's a little ridiculous at this point
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.