Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Bowl ban/Transfer Question

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    634
    vCash
    3100

    Bowl ban/Transfer Question

    I was thinking about this and was going to see if someone knew the answer. If the NCAA adds another year bowl ban to what OM has self imposed, are players on their roster allowed to transfer? Technically the NCAA would have only given them a one year bowl ban with their self imposed one. Does that technicality bind their current roster since the NCAA didn?t technically give them a multi year bowl ban. Doesn?t that make sense? Or does their self imposed become an official NCAA sanction? Just curious.

    I could see that bunch telling AJ or whoever, ?sorry we?re not releasing you because the NCAA only implemented a 1 year bowl ban, the other one was on us?.

  2. #2
    Senior Member West Tn Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    1,288
    vCash
    3874
    The way I understand it............
    The NCAA excepts their bowl ban and adds 1= 2 year ban. They can transfer.
    Bulldogs continue domination of Ole Miss
    BY RICK CLEVELAND

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    164
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by HaggardDawg View Post
    I was thinking about this and was going to see if someone knew the answer. If the NCAA adds another year bowl ban to what OM has self imposed, are players on their roster allowed to transfer? Technically the NCAA would have only given them a one year bowl ban with their self imposed one. Does that technicality bind their current roster since the NCAA didn?t technically give them a multi year bowl ban. Doesn?t that make sense? Or does their self imposed become an official NCAA sanction? Just curious.

    I could see that bunch telling AJ or whoever, ?sorry we?re not releasing you because the NCAA only implemented a 1 year bowl ban, the other one was on us?.
    USCw had a 2 year Bowl ban and Jrs/Srs we?re allowed to transfer because they would not be able to play in a bowl game the rest of their career.

    If UM gets a year added...that would leave the 16 group out of luck as for as transferring goes. Having said that...the NCAA can do what they want and wouldn?t be surprised if they allow the 16 class to transfer. Especially considering the fake news the UM administration put out to the public/recruits.

    I also do not believe that UM would want parents of the 16 class publicly complaining...
    Last edited by StatesboroBlues; 11-03-2017 at 07:54 PM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,742
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by West Tn Dawg View Post
    The way I understand it............
    The NCAA excepts their bowl ban and adds 1= 2 year ban. They can transfer.
    This is correct. The self imposed becomes part of the total sanctions.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.