Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 29

Thread: Rebel Rags Lawsuit is Killing OM Recruiting and I Love It

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    66
    vCash
    3100

    Rebel Rags Lawsuit is Killing OM Recruiting and I Love It

    For what seems like the 100th time in the OM saga, they can't seem to get out of their own way. I have heard from numerous HS Coaches around the State that the RR lawsuit is killing OM in recruiting. To use a phrase popular at om, this is a very bad look for them. Many recruits will not visit for fear of being taped and potentially blackmailed if they do not go there. The parents of recruits see this lawsuit as a bullying tactic to young, black, student athletes. The om fanbase can't seem to understand that the MSU and OM players for the most part are friends off the field. They understand that Leo and Kobe had no choice when the NCAA requested interviews although their fanbase can't seem to grasp it. I'm really shocked it is not more of a national story that a rich white businessman is suing two black student-athletes because they didn't come to his favorite school.

    And for the record, I'm told Leo never changed his story and was very credible at the hearing. He also never said State gave him money. This is another OM talking point lie. This will be obvious when the NCAA nuclear bomb goes off in a few weeks. One of their fan based journalists said this week he expects the NCAA to accept the one year bowl ban. I assure you the bowl ban will be closer to 4 than 1. The level of delusion is staggering among some om fans. The "Leo changed his story" is just "hey look over there" as is MSU receiving a letter. Absolutely no truth to this at all. The om admin should really write a crisis management book about this ordeal. Everyone should buy it and do the exact opposite of what OM has done throughout their scandal.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,715
    vCash
    3700
    Is anybody shocked? Recruits aren't stupid.

  3. #3
    Paysite Policeman Dawg-gone-dawgs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    5,204
    vCash
    3100
    I assure you the bowl ban will be closer to 4 than 1.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    66
    vCash
    3100
    I admit the 4 year bowl ban is optimistic on my part. Based on the new penalty matrix it should actually be more than 4 but it will probably come in at 3.

  5. #5
    Paysite Policeman Dawg-gone-dawgs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    5,204
    vCash
    3100
    If it is 3 their program is toast.

  6. #6
    Senior Member TrapGame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    13,173
    vCash
    4975
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawg-gone-dawgs View Post
    If it is 3 their program is toast.
    3 yr ban, attrition and lost schollies for a few yrs will put them wandering in the college football wilderness for a decade.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Lumpy Chucklelips's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,281
    vCash
    3700
    I'm just looking forward to what their players are going to have to say once they leave and have no retribution hanging over their heads. I'm sure OM will put some bogus non disparagement clause in an exit contract to discourage them from talking when they leave, but they'll talk indirectly and it will find its way to ED.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Lafayette, La
    Posts
    3,048
    vCash
    2620
    I’ll be happy if they get another year bowl ban. 2 more and I’ll have a chronic chub for a while

  9. #9
    Senior Member Jack Lambert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    misippi
    Posts
    13,643
    vCash
    2238605444
    Quote Originally Posted by Lumpy Chucklelips View Post
    I'm just looking forward to what their players are going to have to say once they leave and have no retribution hanging over their heads. I'm sure OM will put some bogus non disparagement clause in an exit contract to discourage them from talking when they leave, but they'll talk indirectly and it will find its way to ED.
    All those 2016 signers have to be piss for being lied to. Many of them only have one year left and probably will want to go where they can have some enjoyment for playing college football. What I mean by one year is they are going pro after next season.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Coursesuper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    4,356
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Lumpy Chucklelips View Post
    I'm just looking forward to what their players are going to have to say once they leave and have no retribution hanging over their heads. I'm sure OM will put some bogus non disparagement clause in an exit contract to discourage them from talking when they leave, but they'll talk indirectly and it will find its way to ED.
    It will be very interesting to see who actually leaves, will some of the ones that are currently under contract give up that monthly pay check.

  11. #11
    Senior Member msudawglb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Huntsville
    Posts
    714
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Lambert View Post
    All those 2016 signers have to be piss for being lied to. Many of them only have one year left and probably will want to go where they can have some enjoyment for playing college football. What I mean by one year is they are going pro after next season.
    Patterson will have a whopping 9 games under his belt when he starts his junior year. And a total of 4 wins and no bowl appearances...thanks to a team that gave up 38 points per game during those 9. What a dumb*** family for taking the money and attending Ole Miss.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    3,671
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Tailgate Superstar View Post
    I admit the 4 year bowl ban is optimistic on my part. Based on the new penalty matrix it should actually be more than 4 but it will probably come in at 3.
    If it's 3, then mathematically it will be closer to 4 than 1. So your prediction would end up being correct.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Dawgology's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    6,274
    vCash
    52525
    Quote Originally Posted by GreenheadDawg View Post
    I’ll be happy if they get another year bowl ban. 2 more and I’ll have a chronic chub for a while
    Yeah. I'll have to go see a doctor after 4 hours on that one.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Dawgology's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    6,274
    vCash
    52525
    Quote Originally Posted by Coursesuper View Post
    It will be very interesting to see who actually leaves, will some of the ones that are currently under contract give up that monthly pay check.
    Those getting paid but have no NFL potential will stay. If they have NFL potential and stay they are making a BAD decision.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,401
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Coursesuper View Post
    It will be very interesting to see who actually leaves, will some of the ones that are currently under contract give up that monthly pay check.
    If Ole Miss is smart (I know) they do not want to risk repeat violator status and I imagine that a lot of the pay for play will have to stop. Actually, that's essentially what did SMU in- they didn't stop the pay for play after they were on probation.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,401
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawgology View Post
    Those getting paid but have no NFL potential will stay. If they have NFL potential and stay they are making a BAD decision.
    I'm actually not expecting a mass exodus. Other than Shea of course. Of course, that will cripple their offense quite a bit.

  17. #17
    Senior Member HereComesTheSpiral's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,651
    vCash
    3650
    Quote Originally Posted by Tailgate Superstar View Post
    I admit the 4 year bowl ban is optimistic on my part. Based on the new penalty matrix it should actually be more than 4 but it will probably come in at 3.
    Well, 3 is closer to 4 than it is to 1 technically speaking.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Coursesuper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    4,356
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    If Ole Miss is smart (I know) they do not want to risk repeat violator status and I imagine that a lot of the pay for play will have to stop. Actually, that's essentially what did SMU in- they didn't stop the pay for play after they were on probation.
    There is the catch 22, stop the payola and run the risk of kids and parents running their mouths about it. Or continue with things as they are and pray you don't get busted. It's quite a predicament.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    19,807
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    If Ole Miss is smart (I know) they do not want to risk repeat violator status and I imagine that a lot of the pay for play will have to stop. Actually, that's essentially what did SMU in- they didn't stop the pay for play after they were on probation.
    I'd be totally shocked if they stopped.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    19,807
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Coursesuper View Post
    There is the catch 22, stop the payola and run the risk of kids and parents running their mouths about it. Or continue with things as they are and pray you don't get busted. It's quite a predicament.
    That was the essence of what did SMU in.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.