-
Originally Posted by
Harrydawg
What to do about proof that UM employees planted bad information to news outlets about Nutt being the primary suspect.......
Is this not a direct breach of the ageeement?
The agreement was that OM was to instruct control groups and employees not to. If the court (rightfully) interprets that as the same thing as being libel for the failed results of their instruction, then I will have a renewed faith in our legal system to 'get it right' to steal a phrase. A it stands, I think that language was intentional because they knew it was bound to happen....and thus...a loophole. What they didnt count on is the price they'd pay in the leading up to the verdict.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.
Reply With Quote