I gots a question bout dat NOA????

[lamont]

Why is the date it was received still redacted hmmmmm???

Could it possibly have been received before Signing Day and hidden to mislead that 2017 Crootin Class???

[Coursesuper]

Other than releasing a few name that they had to do, there is not much here that wasn't already know. Anything still redacted was for a reason for sure. What they are still holding back and I doubt they release is the NCAA answer they have in their possession. That is worth reading.

[WinningIsRelentless]

Better yet how can they justify that redaction?

[HaggardDawg]

Uh oh. They are so amateur.

[JoseBrown]

Noooo. They wouldn't do that Rando, and you know this man.****

[RocketDawg]

There's no reason the received date should have ever been redacted.

[lamont]

Let's see how this goes:

1. OM gets the 2nd NOA before Signing Day
2. Freeze tells recruits the most OM will get is a 1 year bowl ban and if its more than that- they can transfer
3. Signing Day comes and its a top 10 class
4. Hostage video released in late Feb
5. OM announces self-imposed 1 year bowl ban
6. Delay and lie all you can to get recruits on campus. Get disassociated booster to file a suit vs State players, get friendly media to call the NCAA racist.
7. Finally release booster names only because Rosebowl beat you in with the Ethics Commission
8. Delay releasing the NCAA response until after practice starts so that players wont transfer

This folks- is what OM calls "exemplary cooperation"

[Coursesuper]

Let's see how this goes:

1. OM gets the 2nd NOA before Signing Day
2. Freeze tells recruits the most OM will get is a 1 year bowl ban and if its more than that- they can transfer
3. Signing Day comes and its a top 10 class
4. Hostage video released in late Feb
5. OM announces self-imposed 1 year bowl ban
6. Delay and lie all you can to get recruits on campus. Get disassociated booster to file a suit vs State players, get friendly media to call the NCAA racist.
7. Finally release booster names only because Rosebowl beat you in with the Ethics Commission
8. Delay releasing the NCAA response until after practice starts so that players wont transfer

This folks- is what OM calls "exemplary cooperation"

This!!

[Liverpooldawg]

Doesn't that make them in violation of the ethics commission ruling?

[ElitedawgRecruiting]

Part that is amazing to me. The blame Leo and Kobe for everything. Guess what you ignorant ass Harvard wanna be's, even without those two you are screwed. Wanna blame someone. How about this collection of cheaters exposed today. Hey Terry. You got caught. You forgot about something. Can you guess now? That's right. Your screwed

[Dolphus Raymond]

Part that is amazing to me. The blame Leo and Kobe for everything. Guess what you ignorant ass Harvard wanna be's, even without those two you are screwed. Wanna blame someone. How about this collection of cheaters exposed today. Hey Terry. You got caught. You forgot about something. Can you guess now? That's right. Your screwed

BOOM

[yjnkdawg]

Why is the date it was received still redacted hmmmmm???

Could it possibly have been received before Signing Day and hidden to mislead that 2017 Crootin Class???

That received date stamp on the NOA is a part of the requested document in the public records requests. I see no way that can be redacted. ***If it wasn't OM and their well versed knowledge of the provisions of the MS Public Records Act and how to comply with them , then you would think there was a conflict. Hmmm Nothing to see here.****

[yjnkdawg]

I just do not understand why every other State agency is required to comply with the provisions of the MS Public Records Act, and OM can use the pick and choose method, redact what you want, and move on. Redactions are limited under that law. If they pertain to the requested documents, then that information can not be redacted. It appears that OM in reference to the MS Public Records Act, is operating just like the wild wild west.

[phatdog]

According to the 2016 Response to Notice of Allegations, the NOA was received in January of 2016.

[Dawg50]

I just do not understand why every other State agency is required to comply with the provisions of the MS Public Records Act, and OM can use the pick and choose method, redact what you want, and move on. Redactions are limited under that law. If they pertain to the requested documents, then that information can not be redacted. It appears that OM in reference to the MS Public Records Act, is operating just like the wild wild west.

If this is the case, then it could be very serious for their program, especially if university officials knew about any wrong doing. at what point will the NCAA stop looking, if they keep finding more stuff ?

[Reason2succeed]

What about "FREEDOM of INFORMATION" do they not understand? The date is important information. Now we know it's important. Go back to the Ethics Commission or someone needs to go on the offensive and sue OM.

[lamont]

According to the 2016 Response to Notice of Allegations, the NOA was received in January of 2016.

We are talking about the amended NOA- not the original

[Drugs Delaney]

Let's see how this goes:

1. OM gets the 2nd NOA before Signing Day
2. Freeze tells recruits the most OM will get is a 1 year bowl ban and if its more than that- they can transfer
3. Signing Day comes and its a top 10 class
4. Hostage video released in late Feb
5. OM announces self-imposed 1 year bowl ban
6. Delay and lie all you can to get recruits on campus. Get disassociated booster to file a suit vs State players, get friendly media to call the NCAA racist.
7. Finally release booster names only because Rosebowl beat you in with the Ethics Commission
8. Delay releasing the NCAA response until after practice starts so that players wont transfer

This folks- is what OM calls "exemplary cooperation"

"Top ten 2017 recruiting class", you mean top 10 in the SEC?

[WSOPdawg]

"Top ten 2017 recruiting class", you mean top 10 in the SEC?

No, he means top 10 OVERALL as the Shae Shae / Greg Little / AJ Brown / Metcalf class was #6 in the nation in 2016.

[Dawgfan77]

Wasn't Luke named in both NOA?