Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 27

Thread: How the NCAA may rule on OM

  1. #1
    Senior Member Reason2succeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    4,066
    vCash
    2610

    How the NCAA may rule on OM

    The NCAA enacted stricter bylaws to hold coaches more accountable in October 2012 and completely changed its penalty structure. Because the infractions at Louisville happened before and after the new infractions process, the committee compared the two penalty structures and opted for the more lenient one.

    Carol Cartwright, chief hearing officer in the case, explained the decision this way, "It's our process that when violations occur both before and after the new structure, we do the analysis. In this case, the violations were about evenly distributed between the old and the new. It's our standard process in those cases to use the more lenient process and that's what we did in this case."



    http://www.espn.com/mens-college-bas...-sexual-nature


    We've speculated on how the infractions may be split. Maybe that is this reason why the NCAA sent the 2nd NOA. Maybe they want that one punished under the new matrix.
    Death penalty or bust!!!***

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    19,805
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Reason2succeed View Post
    The NCAA enacted stricter bylaws to hold coaches more accountable in October 2012 and completely changed its penalty structure. Because the infractions at Louisville happened before and after the new infractions process, the committee compared the two penalty structures and opted for the more lenient one.

    Carol Cartwright, chief hearing officer in the case, explained the decision this way, "It's our process that when violations occur both before and after the new structure, we do the analysis. In this case, the violations were about evenly distributed between the old and the new. It's our standard process in those cases to use the more lenient process and that's what we did in this case."



    http://www.espn.com/mens-college-bas...-sexual-nature


    We've speculated on how the infractions may be split. Maybe that is this reason why the NCAA sent the 2nd NOA. Maybe they want that one punished under the new matrix.
    Most of the first NOA is also under the new matrix. If I remember right, and they have been accused of SO much I might not have it right, the only stuff that falls under the old one is the ACT fraud stuff with Saunders.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    164
    vCash
    3100
    I would have to believe they would use both considering this has so many different twist and turns. ACT, old...all else, new.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Madison, Alabama
    Posts
    15,694
    vCash
    1886332
    Quote Originally Posted by Reason2succeed View Post
    The NCAA enacted stricter bylaws to hold coaches more accountable in October 2012 and completely changed its penalty structure. Because the infractions at Louisville happened before and after the new infractions process, the committee compared the two penalty structures and opted for the more lenient one.

    Carol Cartwright, chief hearing officer in the case, explained the decision this way, "It's our process that when violations occur both before and after the new structure, we do the analysis. In this case, the violations were about evenly distributed between the old and the new. It's our standard process in those cases to use the more lenient process and that's what we did in this case."



    http://www.espn.com/mens-college-bas...-sexual-nature


    We've speculated on how the infractions may be split. Maybe that is this reason why the NCAA sent the 2nd NOA. Maybe they want that one punished under the new matrix.
    Sounds like they took the "more lenient" route to protect Pitino from the new responsibility rule, and in doing so kinda waffled a bit. Maybe they now consider the new rules too punitive. Might do the same with Freeze, unless they "convict" him personally of major violations.

  5. #5
    Senior Member msbulldog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    W. Monroe, LA
    Posts
    7,429
    vCash
    1089576
    Quote Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg View Post
    Most of the first NOA is also under the new matrix. If I remember right, and they have been accused of SO much I might not have it right, the only stuff that falls under the old one is the ACT fraud stuff with Saunders.
    Liverpool, I think the difference is the amount of infractions. Louisville had one Level 1 and Mississippi has 15, Mississippi has admitted in their response that some of these infractions happened as the investigation was going on. This in itself is the definition of Lack of Institutional Control, which should raise all of the Level 1's to aggravated status.
    While some of the infractions happened before the new punishment matrix was put into place. Mississippi continued to break regulations in the face of continuing investigations, The COI at this point has no other option, but to hand down the harshest penalties.

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    0
    vCash
    2610
    Pitino had 1 Level 1- ONE

    Freeze and OM has 15

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Starkville
    Posts
    4,175
    vCash
    2069649
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster View Post
    Pitino had 1 Level 1- ONE

    Freeze and OM has 15
    I keep waffling on the issue of whether they are penalized above the 30-35 number of scholarships for 4 years or if they go below, do they hammer in another way.

    I think the NCAA is not actually gunning for Freeze per se. I think they are gunning for whatever unidentified group is pulling his strings.

    It seems like the NCAA might be trying to effect change from WITHIN the university. I feel like the only change that will be effective is if their educational board of directors is so publically embarassed by this that they rip it apart and start over hiring new chancellor, athletic director, and a head coach that has credibilty for running a clean program. THE QUESTION is who at that school is powerful enough to clean house in the name of saving some credibility going forward? Yea sure, we all want them to be struggling at the level of SMU for years to come, but if they simply show cause Freeze, you are leaving the source of the problem to hire his replacement.

    This case is so important to the NCAA. And OM is playing right into their hand.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    19,805
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by gravedigger View Post
    I keep waffling on the issue of whether they are penalized above the 30-35 number of scholarships for 4 years or if they go below, do they hammer in another way.

    I think the NCAA is not actually gunning for Freeze per se. I think they are gunning for whatever unidentified group is pulling his strings.

    It seems like the NCAA might be trying to effect change from WITHIN the university. I feel like the only change that will be effective is if their educational board of directors is so publically embarassed by this that they rip it apart and start over hiring new chancellor, athletic director, and a head coach that has credibilty for running a clean program. THE QUESTION is who at that school is powerful enough to clean house in the name of saving some credibility going forward? Yea sure, we all want them to be struggling at the level of SMU for years to come, but if they simply show cause Freeze, you are leaving the source of the problem to hire his replacement.

    This case is so important to the NCAA. And OM is playing right into their hand.
    Freeze isn't the problem. He was hired by the problem.

  9. #9
    Senior Member WSOPdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    2,951
    vCash
    10342450941
    Looking at TCUN's ncaa history

    Strike 1: 1986-1988 TCUN placed on 2 years of ncaa probation for offering "piles of cash," plane tix, cars to prospects by staff members and boosters for violations occurring in 1982-84

    Strike 2: 1994-1998 TCUN placed on 4 years of ncaa probation for offering "piles of cash," plane tix, cars to prospects by staff members and boosters for violations occurring in 1991-94

    Strike 3: 2018-202# TCUN placed on X years of ncaa probation for offering "piles of cash," plane tix, cars to prospects by staff members and boosters for violations occurring in 2010-15


    How many times does the ncaa allow the SAME violations occur repeatedly and why does the ncaa keep allowing history to repeat itself? Methinks not for too much longer and X=DP.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Starkville
    Posts
    4,175
    vCash
    2069649
    Quote Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg View Post
    Freeze isn't the problem. He was hired by the problem.

    absolutely agree.

    And to come out of this probationary period with a competitive team, they have to either cheat as well but without being detected, or take the high road.


    Lest we all forget, MSU went through something similar. Our response was to hire a man who was not some Manchurian candidate for boosters, got a new athletics director, and a President who is quite hands on concerning the image of our school and athletics department.

    Maybe my favorite thing about OM is the reason they wont do what is in their long term best interest. Their allergic reaction to what it will require......humility

  11. #11
    Senior Member Ari Gold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    West coast
    Posts
    4,734
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster View Post
    Pitino had 1 Level 1- ONE

    Freeze and OM has 15
    THIS is all that needs to be ****ing said period when it comes to Umiss dumpster fire. No matter what RR does, no mater how anyone associated with shit place spins it.. Its this

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,669
    vCash
    3305
    Here's my take. With the new rules of punishment, OM know they are 39'd! They are going all in to try and hold on to Freeze, blame others, crucify MsU and the NCAA and think their cheap ass lawyers can mitigate the penalties. It won't happen. Buh Bye!!

  13. #13
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,078
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by StatesboroBlues View Post
    I would have to believe they would use both considering this has so many different twist and turns. ACT, old...all else, new.
    If you have a case that involves the old and the new, I'd think that's pretty clear there's LOIC

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,715
    vCash
    3700
    Was the entire case at Louisville tried under the whole matrix or half in half? It all boils down to the fact that Pitino and Freeze are apples and oranges.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Starkville
    Posts
    4,175
    vCash
    2069649
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    If you have a case that involves the old and the new, I'd think that's pretty clear there's LOIC
    and if you are caught committing Level I violations while you are being investigated.

  16. #16
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,078
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by gravedigger View Post
    and if you are caught committing Level I violations while you are being investigated.
    Yep. They never stopped cheating and now they're in the media pretty much blaming 2 of our SAs that were what 13 years old when the violations in this case started

  17. #17
    Senior Member Jack Lambert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    misippi
    Posts
    13,643
    vCash
    2238605444
    Damn! Pitino is scum. I guess winning is more important to Louisville.

  18. #18
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    3
    vCash
    3100
    I haven't posted much but have been keeping up with the OM fiasco. I've dealt with these OM people a lot through the years and I don't put much past them. If when the sanctions come down they aren't nearly as severe as we thought they'd be remember a couple of things: 1. The top 4 or 5 boosters are worth somewhere north of 1 maybe 2 billion, there's not much money won't by. Believe me somebody is looking at these COI members. 2. Remember who is chairman of the senate appropriations committee and what purse strings of schools come under the committee's purview. The NCAA is dealing with a hyper-competitive bunch of folks that lives by the mantra "if you ain't cheatin' you ain't tryin'".

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,715
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Flatlander View Post
    I haven't posted much but have been keeping up with the OM fiasco. I've dealt with these OM people a lot through the years and I don't put much past them. If when the sanctions come down they aren't nearly as severe as we thought they'd be remember a couple of things: 1. The top 4 or 5 boosters are worth somewhere north of 1 maybe 2 billion, there's not much money won't by. Believe me somebody is looking at these COI members. 2. Remember who is chairman of the senate appropriations committee and what purse strings of schools come under the committee's purview. The NCAA is dealing with a hyper-competitive bunch of folks that lives by the mantra "if you ain't cheatin' you ain't tryin'".
    OM's ass aint near as big out of MS as it is in it. I seriously doubt they have he kind of stroke you claim, and its awful odd that you've lurked until just now...........

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Madison, Alabama
    Posts
    15,694
    vCash
    1886332
    Quote Originally Posted by Pollodawg View Post
    OM's ass aint near as big out of MS as it is in it. I seriously doubt they have he kind of stroke you claim, and its awful odd that you've lurked until just now...........
    It's not even big in the neighboring state, at least in the north central part. Ole Miss is not a household name here. MSU is. Many of my friends think we're called Ole Miss (just like ESPN).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.