Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: So who at Ole Miss ....

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    19,807
    vCash
    3100

    So who at Ole Miss ....

    leaked the student athlete names? That is definitely a Federal crime with pretty severe consequences.
    Last edited by Liverpooldawg; 06-21-2017 at 11:14 AM.

  2. #2
    General Public Political Hack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    General Public
    Posts
    17,287
    vCash
    7178
    Their message board guys were among the first to report it, somimagine some depositions will be lined up for them fairly soon. At least that's where I'd start if I was inn the legal team. They're connected red to each be everyone from he players, to the coaches, to the boosters. You could get a pretty good lay of the land by starting with them.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Spiderman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,711
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg View Post
    leaked the student athlete names? That is definitely a Federal crime with pretty sever consequences.
    Some one in the AD's office to the OM Spirit gays.
    Not only did Mississippi State embarrass LSU on this night. Davis Wade Stadium wrecked Tiger Stadium in music choice, atmosphere and, most of all, volume.

    When I'm 80 and deaf, it's not going to be all those Springsteen concerts or Queen at Municipal Auditorium in New Orleans on Halloween Night in 1978, it will be this game...............Glen Guilbeau--Sherveport Times

  4. #4
    Senior Member Interpolation_Dawg_EX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,380
    vCash
    62623
    ole miss used FERPA to block the release of all 54 emails sent to their compliance department, yet Leo's identity has not been protected under the same expectation of privacy.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,701
    vCash
    4062
    Do the boosters referenced in the NOA receive an unredacted copy? If so, there's nothing keeping them from leaking it.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Spiderman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,711
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by ckDOG View Post
    Do the boosters referenced in the NOA receive an unredacted copy? If so, there's nothing keeping them from leaking it.
    Leo's name was leaked way way before they received the NOA. The effort to discredit Leo began last fall. OM's athletic department leaked it out to the Spirit boys to begin the smear campaign
    Not only did Mississippi State embarrass LSU on this night. Davis Wade Stadium wrecked Tiger Stadium in music choice, atmosphere and, most of all, volume.

    When I'm 80 and deaf, it's not going to be all those Springsteen concerts or Queen at Municipal Auditorium in New Orleans on Halloween Night in 1978, it will be this game...............Glen Guilbeau--Sherveport Times

  7. #7
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,088
    vCash
    3000
    The inclusion of his tweet in OM's response, especially when it wasn't redacted, is a pretty transparent move to make it clear who that was. Because that was left unredacted, it should be a pretty easy thing to force them to leave all the other information unredacted as well.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    19,807
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by ckDOG View Post
    Do the boosters referenced in the NOA receive an unredacted copy? If so, there's nothing keeping them from leaking it.
    Boosters are reps of the university's athletic department. I think FERPA covers them too. It doesn't matter though, because the names were leaked prior to them receiving the NOA. Somebody at UM should be in trouble. There also should be a LOT of Federal money taken away from them.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    4,207
    vCash
    3100
    I would have to say the leak originated in Ole Miss Atletic Department.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,701
    vCash
    4062
    Quote Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg View Post
    Boosters are reps of the university's athletic department. I think FERPA covers them too. It doesn't matter though, because the names were leaked prior to them receiving the NOA. Somebody at UM should be in trouble. There also should be a LOT of Federal money taken away from them.
    I'd be surprised if FERPA extended that far, but I'm out of my element on that one. If that's true, then there is no doubt he'll to pay.

  11. #11
    Senior Member blacklistedbully's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,730
    vCash
    539554
    I'm no legal expert, but when I took a quick look at the FERPA language, it looked to me that simply mentioning a student's name publicly is not a violation. It has to be tied directly to a specific thing FERPA covers, for example, it would be a violation for UNM to release his name along with his grades transcript.

    Again, I'm no lawyer, but that's the way I interpret it. I hope I'm wrong, and even if I'm not, I would think the NCAA is pissed about this regardless. It is a clear attempt to circumvent the NCAA's rules on the matter, as well as a clear attempt to intimidate the NCAA's witnesses.

    Don't see that ending well for UNM in the area that actually matters to UNM fans...their athletics program. I would bet most of them don't give much of a damn about the owner of Rebel Rags one way or the other, beyond whether or not his suit will help them with their NCAA case. But they are too ignorant to realize there's a better chance it actually makes things worse for them with the NCAA...not better.

    They are just throwing more gas on that blazing dumpster fire, and the NCAA is going to put it out with a COI tsunami of regulatory destruction.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    84
    vCash
    3700
    I have two Ole Miss booster friends and they do not know one another. They both stated the same BS about how the NCAA was the one that leaked the names of our players. I tried to have a logical conversation with them, but that is damn near impossible to do. Anyway, the new Ole Miss narrative is that the NCAA leaked out the names.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Hattiesburg
    Posts
    1,060
    vCash
    3005
    They'd better order an 18 wheeler load of lube because it's going to feel like a bull elephant mounted them when it's all said and done.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Jack Lambert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    misippi
    Posts
    13,643
    vCash
    2238605444
    Quote Originally Posted by notsofarawaydawg View Post
    They'd better order an 18 wheeler load of lube because it's going to feel like a bull elephant mounted them when it's all said and done.
    Some of their wives and daughters have already felt that.

  15. #15
    Senior Member BossDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,358
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by Interpolation_Dawg_EX View Post
    ole miss used FERPA to block the release of all 54 emails sent to their compliance department, yet Leo's identity has not been protected under the same expectation of privacy.
    Yup. I'd definitely be suing someone at UM.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    717
    vCash
    5218
    Quote Originally Posted by blacklistedbully View Post
    I'm no legal expert, but when I took a quick look at the FERPA language, it looked to me that simply mentioning a student's name publicly is not a violation. It has to be tied directly to a specific thing FERPA covers, for example, it would be a violation for UNM to release his name along with his grades transcript.

    Again, I'm no lawyer, but that's the way I interpret it. I hope I'm wrong, and even if I'm not, I would think the NCAA is pissed about this regardless. It is a clear attempt to circumvent the NCAA's rules on the matter, as well as a clear attempt to intimidate the NCAA's witnesses.

    Don't see that ending well for UNM in the area that actually matters to UNM fans...their athletics program. I would bet most of them don't give much of a damn about the owner of Rebel Rags one way or the other, beyond whether or not his suit will help them with their NCAA case. But they are too ignorant to realize there's a better chance it actually makes things worse for them with the NCAA...not better.

    They are just throwing more gas on that blazing dumpster fire, and the NCAA is going to put it out with a COI tsunami of regulatory destruction.
    I think that this "leak" seals Bjork's show clause, an ethical man would have stopped this and followed the intention of the law.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Tbonewannabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,674
    vCash
    3500
    Quote Originally Posted by Dental Dawg View Post
    I have two Ole Miss booster friends and they do not know one another. They both stated the same BS about how the NCAA was the one that leaked the names of our players. I tried to have a logical conversation with them, but that is damn near impossible to do. Anyway, the new Ole Miss narrative is that the NCAA leaked out the names.
    Did you get the blank stare when you asked them how it benefits the NCAA to leak the names? It is like when you hear a parrot talking. The parrot will repeat the phrase over and over but it has no clue what the words mean.

  18. #18
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    0
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by ckDOG View Post
    Do the boosters referenced in the NOA receive an unredacted copy? If so, there's nothing keeping them from leaking it.
    No- they only get the part involving them

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.