-
Originally Posted by
msstate7
Fitz gets blamed for Fred dropping balls that hit him in the hands? Tell me, what was wrong with the ball that hit Fred in the hands dead stride in OT vs byu?
You can't cherry pick one pass. That's incompetent.
Fitz throws a heavy, more difficult ball to catch than Dak did. Apply that where you see fit?
And yes, it matters.
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
You can't cherry pick one pass. That's incompetent.
Fitz throws a heavy, more difficult ball to catch than Dak did. Apply that where you see fit?
And yes, it matters.
Wait till Fred sees the steam that cam puts on the ball. WRs in the sec shouldn't drop balls that hit them in the hands imo
-
Originally Posted by
msstate7
Wait till Fred sees the steam that cam puts on the ball. WRs in the sec shouldn't drop balls that hit them in the hands imo
The difficulty of the catch has little to do with the velocity of the pass. It has to do with the touch and rotation of the ball. Brett Favre throws the ball faster than Fitz but throw a softer, more catchable ball. Same for Cam Newton.
Many pitchers that throw hard throw light fastballs hitters whack, while others throw heavy balls that are difficult to lift. The quality of the pass or pitch is only partly due to velocity. Fitz throws a heavy ball. He'd be in our bullpen if he were on the baseball team.
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
The difficulty of the catch has little to do with the velocity of the pass. It has to do with the touch and rotation of the ball. Brett Favre throws the ball faster than Fitz but throw a softer, more catchable ball. Same for Cam Newton.
Many pitchers that throw hard throw light fastballs hitters whack, while others throw heavy balls that are difficult to lift. The quality of the pass or pitch is only partly due to velocity. Fitz throws a heavy ball. He'd be in our bullpen if he were on the baseball team.
I think you're reading too much into a pitch being described as 'heavy' and trying to apply it where it doesn't make sense.
Pitches with sink, or with a lot of top-spin, are called 'heavy' because of that fact - they sink and/or have a lot of top-spin. That's why they're difficult to lift. You can't throw a football with top-spin, therefore it can't be 'heavy' in the same way. A pitch can only be the result of its velocity, angle, and spin. A football can only be the result of its velocity, angle, and spin. But you can't put the same kind of spin on it, and you can't really vary the spin. So it's really the result of its velocity and angle. That's really it.
So if Fitzgerald's throws seem 'heavier' to receivers, it's simply because they're thrown at a higher velocity.
-
Junior Member
Originally Posted by
missouridawg
Room for improvement, for sure. I hope he makes the Dak jump, though. Dak was very average as a passer his sophomore year too.
Dak had much better WR talent to work with
-
Originally Posted by
smootness
I think you're reading too much into a pitch being described as 'heavy' and trying to apply it where it doesn't make sense.
Pitches with sink, or with a lot of top-spin, are called 'heavy' because of that fact - they sink and/or have a lot of top-spin. That's why they're difficult to lift. You can't throw a football with top-spin, therefore it can't be 'heavy' in the same way. A pitch can only be the result of its velocity, angle, and spin. A football can only be the result of its velocity, angle, and spin. But you can't put the same kind of spin on it, and you can't really vary the spin. So it's really the result of its velocity and angle. That's really it.
So if Fitzgerald's throws seem 'heavier' to receivers, it's simply because they're thrown at a higher velocity.
Don't agree. It has to do with RPMs. Pitches that sink and that are heavy don't sink because of top spin unless it's thrown from low slot pitcher. Most sink and weight is created from low RPMs. Read up on Trackman. So basically, Fitz's ball is difficult to catch because it's thrown with high velocity and low RPMs, which causes the pass to be hard and heavy.
Heaviness of pitches and passes correlate with players that produce velocity through strength rather than arm speed. Tony Romo produces velocity through arm speed with looseness, which leads to a tighter spinning ball, while Fitz produces velocity through strength, which leads to a heavy pass that lacks tight spin.
Sink cause by top spin? Lol. I can't stop laughing about that. Is this Tennis?
Read this : http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=22362
Last edited by ShotgunDawg; 05-12-2017 at 03:11 PM.
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
You can't cherry pick one pass. That's incompetent.
Fitz throws a heavy, more difficult ball to catch than Dak did. Apply that where you see fit?
And yes, it matters.
? Sitting on the curve and adjusting to the fast ball ?
-
Originally Posted by
msstate7
Fitz gets blamed for Fred dropping balls that hit him in the hands? Tell me, what was wrong with the ball that hit Fred in the hands dead stride in OT vs byu?
Laces were out?***
Seriously though, I understand some people throw more catchable balls than others. But I don't care if it's heavy, light, or tumbling like a kick off, an sec receiver should catch it 99/100 times when it hits him dead in the hands.
-
I went back and charted all of Fred's drops. He dropped 16 passes and that was being generous, you could've added 4 more. He dropped all kinds of passes too. Short ones, long ones, fast balls, balls with touch. I don't think Fitz was the issue here. And please don't get me wrong, I'm not bashing Fred. I love what he did here and proud he's a Dawg and hope he has great success in the NFL, but he just didn't have a great year catching the football. It sure wasn't for a lack of effort, sometimes stuff happens.
-
Originally Posted by
Random Poster
to better Kang Jackie this year in the Egg Bowl. The Kang was 5-3 against the Shitbirds before #Snitch U had to do everything possible to take him down. As we all know- Mullen is 5-3 vs the Shitbirds and has them at home this year. They have a HS-level LB group and should be pretty shitty on D.
With all the problems they have coming this Fall- that should be a beautiful Thanksgiving for Bulldog fans this year
I see you posting a positive thread about Mullen, rep given
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
Not a popular opinion here, but I'm not near as sold on Fitz as everyone else appears to be. Sure he can run and that offers some hope, but he's a well below average passer IMO and that kills us in games where we can't run the ball.
As good as the Egg Bowl and St Pete Bowl were, he was bad throwing the football in both games. He's got to get better, because teams are going to focus on shutting down our read option game this Fall. Fitz's lack of feel and touch leaves a lot of meat on the bone.
Not even gonna read your post or the rest of this thread just wanted to point out that only your ass would bitch about a sophomore that lead the country in total yards the last eight weeks of the season and was a **** hair away from breaking Cam Newton's all-time SEC rushing record.
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
The difficulty of the catch has little to do with the velocity of the pass. It has to do with the touch and rotation of the ball. Brett Favre throws the ball faster than Fitz but throw a softer, more catchable ball. Same for Cam Newton.
Many pitchers that throw hard throw light fastballs hitters whack, while others throw heavy balls that are difficult to lift. The quality of the pass or pitch is only partly due to velocity. Fitz throws a heavy ball. He'd be in our bullpen if he were on the baseball team.
Before, I was on the fence. Now I know to ignore everything you post. That's just dumb.
Last edited by turkish; 05-12-2017 at 09:27 PM.
-
Originally Posted by
Random Poster
Dak had much better WR talent to work with
He did but Dak as a Sr was an incredible passer. He proved that to be so the next year in the NFL. What was it you called him as a Sr. again?
-
Mullen could be 8-1 or 7-2 against the Shitbirds, this time next year.
-
Junior Member
Originally Posted by
Liverpooldawg
He did but Dak as a Sr was an incredible passer. He proved that to be so the next year in the NFL. What was it you called him as a Sr. again?
He was Checkdown Charlie his Sr year- surely you remember that.
-
Originally Posted by
Random Poster
He was Checkdown Charlie his Sr year- surely you remember that.
Yep, the funny thing is that you still think you were insulting him by calling him that. That's when I lost all respect for your football opinions. Prior to that you and I, as much as we BOTH hate to admit it, were pretty much on the same page football wise. The way Dak played as Sr is what you WANT from a QB, and almost never get in college. I've never seen a college QB improve as much as he did over his career.
-
Junior Member
Thats why you are uneducated. Because I never acted like I was insulting him. I simply described his play. He didnt push the ball down the field enough.
-
Originally Posted by
Random Poster
Thats why you are uneducated. Because I never acted like I was insulting him. I simply described his play. He didnt push the ball down the field enough.
LOL, if so the context was a bit baffling then. That term was a compliment in 2015, whether you intended it that way or not.
-
Fitz threw 4 picks in the spring game; with a completion rate less than 50%. I don't want to hear about WRs sitting that game or any other excuse. If that doesn't give some anxiety, regardless of stats last year, then I don't know what to say.
Hopefully, we game plan for a 70/30 split. Williams is the key that makes the offense go!
-
Originally Posted by
turkish
Before, I was on the fence. Now I know to ignore everything you post. That's just dumb.
CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG
Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.