Page 1 of 15 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 320

Thread: Game 2 vs South Carolina Thread

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. 04-15-2017, 02:16 PM #1
    CadaverDawg
    CadaverDawg is offline
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900

    Game 2 vs South Carolina Thread

    Let's win the series, boys!

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 04-15-2017, 02:16 PM #2
    CadaverDawg
    CadaverDawg is offline
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Gordon on the bump
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 04-15-2017, 03:19 PM #3
    Saltydog
    Saltydog is offline
    Senior Member Saltydog's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8,349
    vCash
    3706

    Gordon isn't a SEC quality pitcher but with our depth we don't have much choice.

    NT
    "The QB and the receiver weren't on the same page there, but hey its only week eleven". (Jack Cristil)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 04-15-2017, 02:17 PM #4
    CadaverDawg
    CadaverDawg is offline
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    I'd swap Lovelady and Poole but not bad. I'd start Bragg at 3B too, but not a bad lineup
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 04-15-2017, 02:42 PM #5
    HoopsDawg
    HoopsDawg is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    16,104
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    I'd swap Lovelady and Poole but not bad. I'd start Bragg at 3B too, but not a bad lineup
    Bragg should be at DH not 3rd.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 04-15-2017, 02:43 PM #6
    CadaverDawg
    CadaverDawg is offline
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    Bragg should be at DH not 3rd.
    I disagree. Can't take Macnamee out
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 04-15-2017, 02:52 PM #7
    HoopsDawg
    HoopsDawg is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    16,104
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    I disagree. Can't take Macnamee out
    No. Mac in RF for Poole.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 04-15-2017, 02:54 PM #8
    basedog
    basedog is offline
    Senior Member basedog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    7,277
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    No. Mac in RF for Poole.
    I agree.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 04-15-2017, 02:20 PM #9
    msstate7
    msstate7 is offline
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,638
    vCash
    10439
    I wouldn't mind seeing Stovall between mangum and rooker with everyone else move down
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 04-15-2017, 02:24 PM #10
    CadaverDawg
    CadaverDawg is offline
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    I wouldn't mind seeing Stovall between mangum and rooker with everyone else move down
    Yea, sure is nice to have Stovall as a second leadoff guy for when LA strikes out to end the innings though.*
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 04-15-2017, 02:40 PM #11
    HoopsDawg
    HoopsDawg is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    16,104
    vCash
    2510
    Stovall should be in the 6 hole but it's not that big a deal.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 04-15-2017, 02:27 PM #12
    msstate7
    msstate7 is offline
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,638
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    Yea, sure is nice to have Stovall as a second leadoff guy for when LA strikes out to end the innings though.*
    Lol

    I do think it's ridiculous we get Alexander, lovelady, Poole, etc more ABs than Stovall
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 04-15-2017, 02:38 PM #13
    CadaverDawg
    CadaverDawg is offline
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Lol

    I do think it's ridiculous we get Alexander, lovelady, Poole, etc more ABs than Stovall
    True, but how good is Stovall's avg if he isn't ahead of Mangum & Rooker? Who knows, but that has to be nice
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 04-15-2017, 02:42 PM #14
    CadaverDawg
    CadaverDawg is offline
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    As much as I'd like to see Bragg get a shot at 3B....I trust Cann, and he clearly doesn't think we have a serviceable option behind LA. Otherwise we'd have seen somebody else...he likes offense too much. So I'm just going to hope LA gets it going today at the plate
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 04-15-2017, 02:53 PM #15
    lamont
    lamont is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    0
    vCash
    2610
    Cann is not going to make a move until the offense starts costing us games. Rooker has been carrying this team so far- and as long as we keep producing decent offense he wont sit Belmont. I'd prefer a more proactice approach- getting Bragg more AB's before nut-cutting time gets here in May
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 04-15-2017, 03:17 PM #16
    I seen it dawg
    I seen it dawg is offline
    Denver Airport Director
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    13,471
    vCash
    2610
    ****ing bush league by the catcher
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 04-15-2017, 03:19 PM #17
    IMissJack
    IMissJack is offline
    Senior Member IMissJack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,099
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by I seen it dawg View Post
    ****ing bush league by the catcher
    It is bush league when the rule to not run over the catcher is there to protect HIM, then he acts like an ass.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 04-15-2017, 03:18 PM #18
    TNDawg35
    TNDawg35 is offline
    Senior Member TNDawg35's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    2,612
    vCash
    3000
    So they were saying Grid was out on a stupid ass base running call, then the Catcher was blocking the plate so he is safe, then reversed it and said he wasnt and he was actually out???
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 04-15-2017, 03:20 PM #19
    smootness
    smootness is offline
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,095
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by TNDawg35 View Post
    So they were saying Grid was out on a stupid ass base running call, then the Catcher was blocking the plate so he is safe, then reversed it and said he wasnt and he was actually out???
    I'm not sure if they ever officially reversed the original call. They called him out, then they conferenced for a while, and the announcers said he was safe and the score was changed...then they reviewed it and confirmed he was out.

    The catcher was blocking the plate, but I guess they said he was doing so in the act of catching the ball. Regardless of the result, it was dumb to send Gridley.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 04-15-2017, 03:33 PM #20
    IMissJack
    IMissJack is offline
    Senior Member IMissJack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,099
    vCash
    3100
    I'm going to have to turn down the sound on this game because "Gomer" or whoever the SC analyst is assisting is terrible.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.