Results 1 to 20 of 183

Thread: IT'S HERE -- Freeze to Resign in the Morning

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member JoseBrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    1,674
    vCash
    2705
    Quote Originally Posted by Political Hack View Post
    He's in hot rocks now!

    Smoot, they received the NOA prior to the day of the video. The clock on the 90 days started a week or so ago. COI hearing will be in June, which leaves them another 3 months to hand down penalties.
    He may need to make the list for the week....

    They certainly received it earlier than they said. And I wouldn't be surprised if something else is in the hopper. It just wouldn't surprise me if they don't get their COI meeting this year For some reason.
    You're blind if you can't see improvement.....Freshmens......Strain.....Kick rocks and pound sand......Drag my Yankee ass outta here!......

  2. #2
    Senior Member blacklistedbully's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,730
    vCash
    539554
    Frequently Asked Questions
    Is the Committee on Infractions part of the NCAA?
    No, the Committee on Infractions is an independent body that decides if NCAA rules have been broken and what the appropriate penalties should be. Each case is reviewed by a panel of committee members to find the facts of the case. After a hearing with members from the school, other involved individuals and the NCAA enforcement staff, the committee concludes whether violations occurred and prescribes penalties.

    How does the new penalty structure provide greater predictability and consistency?
    There are many aggravating and mitigating factors that can impact how the committee imposes penalties. For example, multiple Level I violations, lack of institutional control, unethical conduct or other factors could result in tougher penalties. The committee could consider self-reporting of violations, cooperation during the investigation, meaningful corrective measures and other factors actions that could lessen the prescribed penalties.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    239
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by blacklistedbully View Post
    Frequently Asked Questions
    Is the Committee on Infractions part of the NCAA?
    No, the Committee on Infractions is an independent body that decides if NCAA rules have been broken and what the appropriate penalties should be. Each case is reviewed by a panel of committee members to find the facts of the case. After a hearing with members from the school, other involved individuals and the NCAA enforcement staff, the committee concludes whether violations occurred and prescribes penalties.

    How does the new penalty structure provide greater predictability and consistency?
    There are many aggravating and mitigating factors that can impact how the committee imposes penalties. For example, multiple Level I violations, lack of institutional control, unethical conduct or other factors could result in tougher penalties. The committee could consider self-reporting of violations, cooperation during the investigation, meaningful corrective measures and other factors actions that could lessen the prescribed penalties.
    At what point does the NCAA Enforcement Staff deliberate and review the findings of the Allegations presented in the NOA?

  4. #4
    Senior Member blacklistedbully's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,730
    vCash
    539554
    Quote Originally Posted by LockeDawg View Post
    At what point does the NCAA Enforcement Staff deliberate and review the findings of the Allegations presented in the NOA?
    During the COI. Think of the NCAA Enforcement staff as the prosecutor, UNM as the defendant and it's legal defense team, and the COI as the jury in a trial.

    After the "trial", UNM can appeal, but the appeal would be to another set of people like the COI, and it would not be a new trial. This "appellate jury" would read, or hear UNM explain why, in their opinion the COI's ruling was clearly contrary to the evidence; the individual or school did not actually break NCAA rules; there was a procedural error that caused the committee on infractions to find a violation of NCAA rules; or the penalty was excessive.

  5. #5
    Senior Member blacklistedbully's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,730
    vCash
    539554
    Division I Committee on Infractions

    Legislation: The Board of Directors shall appoint a Committee on Infractions comprised of not more than 24 members to act as hearing officers in infractions proceedings of the Association. The Board of Directors shall also appoint one member of the committee to serve as chair and another member to serve as vice chair. If at any time the chair is unavailable to act as such, the vice chair is empowered to exercise the functions of the chair. There shall be no subdivision restrictions except that all nonpublic members may not be from the same subdivision. The committee shall reflect the Association's commitment to diversity. To the extent reasonably possible, the Committee shall include members from each of the following categories: (a) Current or former college or university presidents, chancellors or other senior institutional administrators (no more than three years removed from employment by a member institution or similar service at the time of his or her initial appointment); (b) Current or former directors of athletics (no more than three years removed from employment by a member institution or similar service at the time of his or her initial appointment); (c) Former NCAA coaches (no more than 10 years removed from employment by a member institution or similar service at the time of his or her initial appointment); (d) Representatives from conference offices; (e) University staff or faculty, including but not limited to faculty athletics representatives; (f) Athletics administrators with compliance experience; and (g) Members of the general public with formal legal training who are not associated with a collegiate institution, conference, or professional or similar sports organization and who do not represent coaches or athletes in any capacity.

    Liaisons: Shepard C. Cooper, Joel McGormley, Dino Pollock, Matt Mikrut, Jim Elworth
    Chair: Gregory Sankey (Sep 2014 - Aug 2019)
    Vice-Chair: Eleanor W. Myers (Sep 2014 - Aug 2018)


    *Eligible for reappointment
    Division Committee Positions Title Name & Institution Conference Term
    Expiration
    FBS Chair Commissioner Gregory Sankey
    Southeastern Conference Southeastern Conference AUG 2019
    FBS Member Deputy Director of Athletics Melissa L. Conboy
    University of Notre Dame Atlantic Coast Conference AUG 2017
    FBS Vice-Chair FAR Eleanor W. Myers
    Temple University American Athletic Conference AUG 2018
    FBS Member Former President Michael F. Adams
    University of Georgia Southeastern Conference AUG 2017*
    FBS Member Provost and Vice President for Academic Joyce McConnell
    West Virginia University Big 12 Conference AUG 2019*
    FBS Member Senior VP for Student Affairs Thomas Hill
    Iowa State University Big 12 Conference AUG 2018*
    FBS Member VP for Athletic Compliance David Roberts
    University of Southern California Pac-12 Conference AUG 2018*
    FCS Member Professor/Dean Alberto Gonzales
    Belmont University Ohio Valley Conference AUG 2017*
    FCS Member University Counsel Sankar Suryanarayan
    Princeton University The Ivy League AUG 2019*
    DI Member AD Greg Christopher
    Xavier University Big East Conference AUG 2018*
    DI Member Chancellor Gary L. Miller
    University of Wisconsin-Green Bay Horizon League AUG 2018*
    DI Member Deputy Commissioner and Chief Operating Officer Vincent Nicastro
    Big East Conference Big East Conference AUG 2019*
    Member Attorney Jill Pilgrim
    Pilgrim Associates AUG 2017*
    Member Attorney John Black
    National Federation of State High School Associations AUG 2017
    Member Attorney Stephen Madva
    Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoades, LLP AUG 2019*
    Member Attorney William Bock III
    Kroger, Gardis & Regas LLP AUG 2019*
    Member Executive Director Britton Banowsky
    College Football Playoff Foundation AUG 2017
    Member Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Larry Parkinson
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission AUG 2017*
    Member Former AD Joel Maturi
    AUG 2019*
    Member Former Head Coach Joe Novak
    AUG 2017*
    Member Former President Carol Cartwright
    AUG 2019*
    Member

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.