Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: I Think Wolken Summed It Up Best Today

  1. #1
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700

    I Think Wolken Summed It Up Best Today

    Was listening to Bounds this morning and thought Dan Wolken had the best perspective that I've heard on the Ole Miss situation.

    While everyone wants a smoking gun that links Ole Miss to massive cash payments, pay for play, and hookers, for the NCAA, it was never about that. What they found is exactly what they were looking for. The allegations against OM are numerous and vary on severity, but all paint a rather clear picture that this was an organized effort by a program to systematically cut corners in order to find advantages in recruiting. A clear and consistent trend of boosters and coaches working together to recruit was established and at the end of the day, that was all the smoking gun the NCAA needed.

    OM fans will say that each individual violation is petty and minimize the severity of such allegation, but when all allegations are combined it's paints a clear picture of how "The Network" operated in cohesion with the coaching staff.

    Just thought Wolken hit the nail on the head better than any other media personality or journalist.
    Last edited by ShotgunDawg; 02-24-2017 at 01:40 AM.
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  2. #2
    Senior Member Dawgface's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Meridian
    Posts
    4,049
    vCash
    4700
    Saw a post on another board that said he expected 45-60 scholarships lost and a 3 year bowl ban. Did he really say this?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    101,295
    vCash
    3800
    They will be "no bowl ole" for a while. If the scholarship reduction is what I believe it will be, they won't go to one anyway for several years.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    894
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawgface View Post
    Saw a post on another board that said he expected 45-60 scholarships lost and a 3 year bowl ban. Did he really say this?
    He apparently said it on a radio interview, it was posted here yesterday in one of the threads as well

  5. #5
    Senior Member thf24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,543
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawgface View Post
    Saw a post on another board that said he expected 45-60 scholarships lost and a 3 year bowl ban. Did he really say this?
    I have a hard time wrapping my head around 60. If they got that they're looking at a 10+ year recovery. They might as well just go ahead and give them the death penalty instead, it might not even be as bad in the end. I think 45 has got to be the upper limit if the death penalty isn't on the table.

  6. #6
    Senior Member WSOPdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    2,960
    vCash
    10342450941
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    Was listening to Bounds this morning and thought Dan Wolken had the best perspective that I've heard on the Ole Miss situation.

    While everyone wants a smoking gun that links Ole Miss to massive cash payments, pay for play, and hookers, for the NCAA, it was never about that. What they found is exactly what they were looking for. The allegations against OM are numerous and vary on severity, but all paint a rather clear picture that this was an organized effort by a program to systematically cut corners in order to find advantages in recruiting. A clear and consistent trend of boosters and coaches working together to recruit was established and at the end of the day, that was all the smoking gun the NCAA needed.

    OM fans will say that each individual violation is petty and minimize the severity of such allegation, but when all allegations are combined it's paints a clear picture of how "The Network" operated in cohesion with the coaching staff.

    Just thought Wolken hit the nail on the head better than any other media personality or journalist.
    This ^^^^^

    Most are chastising the minimal amounts of each allegation, but from the NCAA's point of view, it's the system they're looking to dismantle.

    If you pay Player B 13-15.6k, what's to say you didn't pay players X, Y and Z significantly more? If you provide free accommodations at the Inn to only one player mentioned in the NOA, what's to say you didn't provide the same accommodations to 20 other recruits (which everybody knows they did!!!)?

    Dan Wolken has been the best so far amongst the national media to grasp that this is not about the small dollar amounts listed as much as it is about the system in place to make the NCAA look like fools.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.