Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 69

Thread: And just as I said....

  1. #21
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,587
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by I seen it dawg View Post
    He started what a game? Grid is gonna have to play his way off of ss and rightfully so. Just deal with it and get used to it.
    He started 19 games at SS last season and 1 at 2b (tried to come back from injury and left early)

  2. #22
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,587
    vCash
    10439
    And you guys are right... gridley has done nothing at ss to cost us games. The problem is he hasn't done anything to win games defensively at SS either. Luke can win games with his glove. And the difference in offense?

    In '16...
    Gridley ops = .685
    Luke ops = .675

  3. #23
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    I don't see AC moving Gridley. Not after the preseason praise he gave him. And while I don't think Gridley has great range...I don't think he needs to be moved. Gotta have him in the batting order, and unless you switch him & LA, or put him at 2B and Stovall at 3B, I don't know where you move him. Plus, he hasn't been practicing those positions, nor have Stovall or LA. So best case scenario is leave them be since this was one game against a top 15-20 opponent.

  4. #24
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    And you guys are right... gridley has done nothing at ss to cost us games. The problem is he hasn't done anything to win games defensively at SS either. Luke can win games with his glove. And the difference in offense?

    In '16...
    Gridley ops = .685
    Luke ops = .675
    Then you need them both in the lineup. That's all that tells me. You don't take a solid bat like Gridley out of the lineup when you clearly don't have great hitters this year. Don't make a bad problem worse by removing one of its' better pieces

  5. #25
    Senior Member basedog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    7,238
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    He started 19 games at SS last season and 1 at 2b (tried to come back from injury and left early)
    Dude, take a break sometimes. You talking about last year? Who gives a flip?

    New Coach, new team, new year. One game and you bitching about a player already?

  6. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    89
    vCash
    3100
    They're not getting moved. Cannizzaro wants both in the lineup. Gridley can't really play third. Gridley is a solid ss. I don't know what the deal is against him. Also I would almost bet you that he's going to hit 300 with a good amount of doubles and 4 homeruns this year

  7. #27
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,587
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    I don't see AC moving Gridley. Not after the preseason praise he gave him. And while I don't think Gridley has great range...I don't think he needs to be moved. Gotta have him in the batting order, and unless you switch him & LA, or put him at 2B and Stovall at 3B, I don't know where you move him. Plus, he hasn't been practicing those positions, nor have Stovall or LA. So best case scenario is leave them be since this was one game against a top 15-20 opponent.
    I know I come across as a gridley hater, but that's just not the case. Again, gridley's ops was .685 last season... not good. Best scenario for the team is Stovall at 2b, Alexander at SS, and Bragg or Skelton man 3b and hit.

    About gridley's .685 ops... Cody brown's ops was .786 and he sits. If you ops below .700, you've got to be elite defensively, not adequate

  8. #28
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by hailstate17 View Post
    They're not getting moved. Cannizzaro wants both in the lineup. Gridley can't really play third. Gridley is a solid ss. I don't know what the deal is against him. Also I would almost bet you that he's going to hit 300 with a good amount of doubles and 4 homeruns this year
    I'm with this guy ^^

  9. #29
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    I know I come across as a gridley hater, but that's just not the case. Again, gridley's ops was .685 last season... not good. Best scenario for the team is Stovall at 2b, Alexander at SS, and Bragg or Skelton man 3b and hit.

    About gridley's .685 ops... Cody brown's ops was .786 and he sits. If you ops below .700, you've got to be elite defensively, not adequate
    Well Cody Brown doesn't play infield, so...

    Gridley is nowhere Near as bad defensively as y'all try to paint him. Not a ton of range, but a good SS. If he can get to it, he makes the play

  10. #30
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,587
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by hailstate17 View Post
    They're not getting moved. Cannizzaro wants both in the lineup. Gridley can't really play third. Gridley is a solid ss. I don't know what the deal is against him. Also I would almost bet you that he's going to hit 300 with a good amount of doubles and 4 homeruns this year
    His career ISO is .065... I wouldn't hold my breath on power coming

  11. #31
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,587
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    Well Cody Brown doesn't play infield, so...

    Gridley is nowhere Near as bad defensively as y'all try to paint him. Not a ton of range, but a good SS. If he can get to it, he makes the play
    Range and arm are what make a good SS

  12. #32
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    I know I come across as a gridley hater, but that's just not the case. Again, gridley's ops was .685 last season... not good. Best scenario for the team is Stovall at 2b, Alexander at SS, and Bragg or Skelton man 3b and hit.

    About gridley's .685 ops... Cody brown's ops was .786 and he sits. If you ops below .700, you've got to be elite defensively, not adequate
    Oh, and quit using last year's stats. It's a new season, with a new hitting coach, and players with more experience.

  13. #33
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Range and arm are what make a good SS
    Then he has enough, bc he's pretty good. He isn't great. But far from a liability at SS. We have FAR bigger defensive issues than Gridley, yet you are stuck on him for some reason. He isn't moving, so I guess I don't get the point

  14. #34
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    His career ISO is .065... I wouldn't hold my breath on power coming
    He had at least 1 HR last year, and several extra base hits. Again, Gridley was nowhere near a liability at the plate last year, so why are you ripping him? We don't have another infielder to put there without opening another weakness at 3B. And there's no way of knowing that Gridley won't have a better year than Stovall AND LA, bc Gridley is solid. You're hung up on him

  15. #35
    Member PlattsburgDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Starkville
    Posts
    34
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster View Post
    He's not going anywhere- and Belmont better hit because the kid from Washington is breathing down his neck
    If the kid from Washington ends up playing 3rd base, we are in major trouble. I am all for him DH'ing, but trust me he isn't there defensively yet.

  16. #36
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,587
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    He had at least 1 HR last year, and several extra base hits. Again, Gridley was nowhere near a liability at the plate last year, so why are you ripping him? We don't have another infielder to put there without opening another weakness at 3B. And there's no way of knowing that Gridley won't have a better year than Stovall AND LA, bc Gridley is solid. You're hung up on him
    Lack of range and arm at the most premium defensive position.

    Career OPS (398 ABs) is .663. In the cape this summer, he OPS'd at .588 (31 games).

    Where do you guys get this idea he's gonna suddenly be a silver slugger, slick fielding SS?
    Last edited by msstate7; 02-18-2017 at 11:06 AM.

  17. #37
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,587
    vCash
    10439
    Cadaver, I argued that Holloway should've been the guy in the preseason. My reasoning was that Mullen obviously thought Holloway was the best option and that was good enough for me. I was wrong and so was Mullen... aeris was the best of our RBs. This is a similar situation imo. Luke is a backup SS to a lesser player

  18. #38
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Cadaver, I argued that Holloway should've been the guy in the preseason. My reasoning was that Mullen obviously thought Holloway was the best option and that was good enough for me. I was wrong and so was Mullen... aeris was the best of our RBs. This is a similar situation imo. Luke is a backup SS to a lesser player
    Lol, well I argued for Aeris & against Holloway and was right, and now I'm arguing for Gridley. Haha

  19. #39
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Lack of range and arm at the most premium defensive position.

    Career OPS (398 ABs) is .663. In the cape this summer, he OPS'd at .588 (31 games).

    Where do you guys get this idea he's gonna suddenly be a silver slugger, slick fielding SS?
    Who said he was going to be a slugger? You're talking about one of our best bats...think about that. It doesn't matter how good or bad he is according to your stats, he's still one of the best we've got...so you don't remove him. It's that simple

  20. #40
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    89
    vCash
    3100
    Not very similar in my opinion. It would be like if you lined them both up at running back or put Holloway in the slot. Look Alexander might be a litttle more talented. But tell me if we take Alexander off third base. Who is playing there? We're trying to make a catcher into a third baseman, but think Gavin Collins with less homeruns and lower average. (At this point in his career) then we have another guy who can't hit or field, but he has a ton of potential. Y'all want to put him on the field? Last night was our best infield. The only difference I would like in the lineup is Cody Brown and Poole in the lineup for marrero and blaylock

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.