-
02-02-2018, 01:49 PM
#2521
Originally Posted by
SmokeyDawg
From what I understand the total we have scholarships for is 21 I believe. Any more and you have to process that many out which Moorhead said he wasn’t going to do this year. We have 18 committed (1 sign and place) add Lovett and reed. We have 1 scholarship remaining unless someone processes themself.
It's 20 as of right now.
-
02-02-2018, 02:30 PM
#2522
Originally Posted by
Commercecomet24
We only have 15 that have signed so if 21 is the max we have 6 left that we could sign next week.
We do have the 3 that are committed and If those 3 signed we would have 3 left.
I thought Moon transfer made it 21 but it is 20. 15 signed + commits Watson, Furdge, Patterson (s&p), and Lovett, Reed. That?s our 20 scholarships to get us at 85. For anyone we add someone else has to be proccessed
-
02-02-2018, 02:34 PM
#2523
Originally Posted by
SmokeyDawg
I thought Moon transfer made it 21 but it is 20. 15 signed + commits Watson, Furdge, Patterson (s&p), and Lovett, Reed. That?s our 20 scholarships to get us at 85. For anyone we add someone else has to be proccessed
Yep that?s what it looks like unless we take somebody in lieu of one of those 3 that are committed now.
-
02-02-2018, 02:46 PM
#2524
Originally Posted by
Ari Gold
To add to all the gloom and doom and meltdowns ..
Of the top 5 guys we missed on. If we had the old staff still intact we prob just land 2 of them. ( McDowell and Bleich)
Carvin - Tenn
Smith - Bama
Bishop - would have still flipped to Arky
And I bet Mason would have still flipped as well.
So let?s see what the new staff can do now that they are all intact and have been here more than a minute or 2.
Here's what I don't get. Everyone saying Ark and Tenn staff coming in and recruiting harder and having better success under the same circumstances as us. No, they are not the same circumstances. Ark coach brought his entire offensive staff with him. So already had coaches familiar with him, what he wanted to do and how he wanted it done. Tennessee, yes had to hire new staff also, so similar, but with a new head coach that just came off a National Championship win with Bama (might be a strong selling point) and regardless of what Tennessee has become in the last 10 years, they still have much better name recognition than ours and better history. BUT (and it's a big one) neither of those coaches had to deal with their predecessor (a popular and successful coach, who had moved to a top 10 athletic program) recruiting their already committed players away from them. All those guys had to concentrate on was finding new recruits to fill out their classes. They didn't have to fight off the previous coach who had recruited all their current kids to start with. Who had a head start of trust and on field success going back months and even years. I can only imagine the kind of effort it took to keep all the guys we did with "he who shall not be named" up in their houses doing the gator chomp within a week after he left here. Our staff couldn't concentrate on what might happen after early signing cause they were in the fight of their life. Ark and Tenn got a leg up on new kids because DM was trying to screw us by systematically dismantling the recruiting class we paid him to build. Which we actually had to force him to work harder for than any previous year by not giving him his automatic yearly raise in 2016. And after all DM's efforts (more than I think he and his staff ever gave us), he still only got a kicker (which we didn't need cause we have a great one for 3 more years) and an OLine (who we did need) who left without a backward glance even though DM waited 2 MONTHS to offer him, which shows me he was committed to DM and staff and not MSU in the first place. THAT IS A TREMENDOUS JOB! THAT DOESN'T JUST HAPPEN. And if you don't think OM and BAMA and everybody else in the SEC was after our 4* kids, too, when DM left...but we kept them. And added to it by two and I believe our new coaches got us WHOP. As far as I know he wasn't committed before signing and that was up in the air unless I am mistaken. So he should count as a new player pulled by new staff and Kilby-Lane, also. Also, keeping SWEAT was probably a recruiting job unto itself considering he was getting a new coordinator.
Yes, our OLine needs some help. But this is mostly because of DM and staff. Also, I seem to have read at least a couple national articles about Moorhead and Penn that specifically stated what a bad Oline he had (not his recruiting fault, he was only there 2 yrs) at Penn State and their offense was explosive in spite of the OLine. Because of scheme, because they are not counted on as much because there are so many options with which way the ball might go that alone keeps the defense on their heels. It may be that Oline play is not as important and may be more about bodies than stars for us. Don't know yet.
Long story long, yes I wanted to finish stronger than it looks like we are, we all did, but having said that, I am not worried about our future recruiting. And I am not INSANE for saying that and I don't need anyone to be worried about my mental health because of it (talk about an overreaction). Our situation, our head coach's situation, our new coaching staff's situation, was different from every other new coaching staff recruiting in the SEC this year. It was more difficult.
I think we are going to kick A** and take names in the SEC this year and that recruits are going to take notice. I think Moorhead is going to be talked about positively all over the country and recruits are going to notice. I think we are going to have a lot of spots to fill next year because we are going to have put a lot of guys in the NFL and recruits are going to notice. I think we are going to cover our field with Gator and Tiger blood and recruits are going to notice. I think we are going to prove that we don't need DM to be successful and recruits are going to notice. He built up this fallacy (and I will admit that I bought it) that we couldn't get high end players to come to State because State so all our success was because of him and his magical evaluation powers. There are people who believe this even now, recruits, coaches, press, fans...but really we didn't get any of those kids because he refused to recruit them. You never get turned down if you never offer and his ego wouldn't allow him to get turned down. "Shoot your shot" is not in his vocabulary (as his tight play calling in big games can attest too), that is why he jumped to FLA where recruiting is "easier" (I have my doubts about his success there, too). I think we are going to shoot our shot in recruiting and yes we are going to miss some but we are also going to hit on some we never had a shot at before. Finally, I do not think that John Cohen is ever going to let us fall back into mediocrity.
That is all. Sorry for the long post but I needed to get it out.
-
02-02-2018, 02:50 PM
#2525
Originally Posted by
HoopsDawg
Since we have open scholarships, I wish we would offer Tylan Knight as a special teams specialist. He will probably sign with Ole Miss.
He will and he will make them better. If we dont offer bc our noses are up in the air about his size then we cant say anything about the OM attitude (thinking they are better than everyone for no reason)
-
02-02-2018, 02:54 PM
#2526
He won’t touch the field beyond KR/PR. But he will eat up a scholarship.
-
02-02-2018, 03:04 PM
#2527
Originally Posted by
Cooterpoot
He won’t touch the field beyond KR/PR. But he will eat up a scholarship.
Sometimes a good KR/PR can be extremely valuable. I've seen us waste a lot of scholarships on other players, such as nonathletic OL, who never see the field and remain on the bench.
-
02-02-2018, 03:06 PM
#2528
I?m sure IYOK numbers are right if so it looks like we don?t have anymore schollies to offer.
-
02-02-2018, 03:10 PM
#2529
Originally Posted by
Commercecomet24
I?m sure IYOK numbers are right if so it looks like we don?t have anymore schollies to offer.
Thats fine if we have no room. But hes worth an offer, anybody that doesnt think so go watch the tape
-
02-02-2018, 03:29 PM
#2530
Originally Posted by
BuckyIsAB****
Thats fine if we have no room. But hes worth an offer, anybody that doesnt think so go watch the tape
I thought we had more room, but it looks like we out of space. I agree with you the kid looks like a baller, small or not. Heck we ran Holloway out there. I admire Holloway, we asked him to do some things better suited for bigger backs but that young man was tough as nails and made plays for us. I have an affinity for the little guys myself.
-
02-02-2018, 03:32 PM
#2531
Originally Posted by
BuckyIsAB****
Thats fine if we have no room. But hes worth an offer, anybody that doesnt think so go watch the tape
We'll just agree to disagree.
-
02-02-2018, 03:39 PM
#2532
Originally Posted by
NCDawg
Sometimes a good KR/PR can be extremely valuable. I've seen us waste a lot of scholarships on other players, such as nonathletic OL, who never see the field and remain on the bench.
You won't find guys recruited simply to return kicks. Not in the SEC and with scholarship limits like are in place now. I like the fact that OM is going to burn one on a KR. Let them be down a scholarship for that crap.
-
02-02-2018, 03:48 PM
#2533
So what’s the true eval on Reed? What can he be?
-
02-02-2018, 04:48 PM
#2534
Originally Posted by
Cooterpoot
You won't find guys recruited simply to return kicks. Not in the SEC and with scholarship limits like are in place now. I like the fact that OM is going to burn one on a KR. Let them be down a scholarship for that crap.
Hes a KR/PR that won MVP of the MS/AL game for having 2 INTs and multiple tackles against kids with ''D1 Size'' at OLB
-
02-02-2018, 04:52 PM
#2535
Originally Posted by
Bdawg
So what’s the true eval on Reed? What can he be?
His video looks good, he seems to be physical in run support and in coverage, has good speed and decent size. Hard to trust videos because they only give you the best plays. Hopefully somebody that has seen him play in person or studied him more can give us some more info.
-
02-02-2018, 05:00 PM
#2536
Originally Posted by
BuckyIsAB****
Hes a KR/PR that won MVP of the MS/AL game for having 2 INTs and multiple tackles against kids with ''D1 Size'' at OLB
And it was an all star game. A kid that went to Delta State won MVP in it one time. But you can list all of the 5'7 DBs in the SEC if you want to. Then, all the ones in the NFL. It's just not happening. I'm sure he's a good athlete and kid.
Last edited by Cooterpoot; 02-02-2018 at 05:02 PM.
-
02-02-2018, 06:00 PM
#2537
Originally Posted by
Cooterpoot
You won't find guys recruited simply to return kicks. Not in the SEC and with scholarship limits like are in place now. I like the fact that OM is going to burn one on a KR. Let them be down a scholarship for that crap.
Special teams is a third of the game. He could be on all of the special teams units such as punt coverage, kick coverage, returns, etc. That would be a bigger contribution than some of these late pickups will make. Steve Tasker was a pro bowler and he only played special teams. Also, we have room. There is now way we won't have attrition after the spring. I bet we end up at least 3 under the 85 number.
-
02-02-2018, 06:10 PM
#2538
Originally Posted by
HoopsDawg
Special teams is a third of the game. He could be on all of the special teams units such as punt coverage, kick coverage, returns, etc. That would be a bigger contribution than some of these late pickups will make. Steve Tasker was a pro bowler and he only played special teams. Also, we have room. There is now way we won't have attrition after the spring. I bet we end up at least 3 under the 85 number.
I don?t know the answer to this question and maybe you or someone else can answer. Can we sign enough that would put us over the 85 scholly limit and adjust before the fall or do you have to just stay at 85 or below at all times? Thanks
Last edited by Commercecomet24; 02-02-2018 at 07:12 PM.
-
02-02-2018, 07:15 PM
#2539
Senior Member
Lovett feels like an UM flip special....
Originally Posted by
yjnkdawg
David Johnson even has his CB prediction to MSU for Lovett and Reed this morning.
Yancy and David hardly ever concede this easy. Feels like they are trying for maximum impact.
-
02-02-2018, 07:18 PM
#2540
I wish we could have flexed our SEC muscle a bit and tried to sway some kids from other programs to at least visit, even if it was La Tech, Central Michigan, Wake Forrest types. With the early signing period there may not have been much left there to choose from, I don't know.
Time is going to tell. We can discuss it to death after signing day and we see what we ended up with. I still think we may save 1-2 schollies for a transfer or two.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.