Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: FB roster update...

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    15,997
    vCash
    2510

    FB roster update...

    Counting the early enrollees, we have 70 players on scholarship for next season. We have 7 commits for a total of 77 committed scholarships. That leaves 8 open roster spots for new commits from now until signing day.

    But here's the kicker, we will only have 10 scholarship seniors next year. We will have more attrition for sure, but we need to sign a full 25 next year so that's 15 spots that have to be created. Mullen doesn't love processing kids. That's my theory on why we may not use all of the available scholarships this year. We want Bulovas and Gay for sure. We need 2 more offensive linemen. But I think we may bank the other 4 scholarships and give them to walk-ons or to a guy like Timbs on a 1 year basis.

  2. #2
    Senior Member JoseBrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    1,674
    vCash
    2705
    Well, we offered the preferred walk on to the long snapper, but I believe that should roll into just taking over an existing schollie with current long snapper.

    Not sure if we've offered schollies to Boluvas yet. If not, I'm sure we would. After he visits GT we will get his decision.

    If we are so fortunate to get Gay that is one.

    Not sure we have a shot with Carty.

    I think TBuck has a CB that may visit, if so maybe we beat out Oregon. That would be one.

    Wish we could flip a WR we like. Maybe Bowie makes his visit this weekend. There's one more.

    Any OL we could give one to? And QB?
    You're blind if you can't see improvement.....Freshmens......Strain.....Kick rocks and pound sand......Drag my Yankee ass outta here!......

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    15,997
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by JoseBrown View Post
    Well, we offered the preferred walk on to the long snapper, but I believe that should roll into just taking over an existing schollie with current long snapper.

    Not sure if we've offered schollies to Boluvas yet. If not, I'm sure we would. After he visits GT we will get his decision.

    If we are so fortunate to get Gay that is one.

    Not sure we have a shot with Carty.

    I think TBuck has a CB that may visit, if so maybe we beat out Oregon. That would be one.

    Wish we could flip a WR we like. Maybe Bowie makes his visit this weekend. There's one more.

    Any OL we could give one to? And QB?
    Yeah, and Reed is a sign and place at best, but he may be a decommit after this weekend. So we actually only have 6 committed signees right now. That is crazy. And Bulovas does have a scholarship offer.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,694
    vCash
    3100
    Why is Reed expected to decommit?

  5. #5
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    12,666
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by HSVDawg View Post
    Why is Reed expected to decommit?
    UNM finally decided to offer after he committed to us and they are now pushing to flip him.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Tripp McNeely's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Germantown, TN
    Posts
    1,436
    vCash
    3460
    Posted something very similar on the 247 board

    Let me preface this by saying that this is not a "we didn't want Aaron Odom" post. He put up video game numbers last year, seemed to have a lot of potential...by all accounts, seemed really wanted by our coaches.

    What this is meant to convey is a little bit of perspective and convey the larger picture of how coaches look at roster management.

    After last night's news, we currently have 79 of our 85 scholarships accounted for or 93% (take T. Reed off there if you want to...it doesn't really hurt the argument). So, that is 93% of our roster filled with players that our coaches really like and feel good about.

    So, what about the other 6-7 schollies? look at our target list right now, there is a lot of feast or famine...likely famine...left on it:

    Jacob Free
    CEH
    Al'Dontre Davis
    DD
    McMath
    Eze
    Carty
    Bateman
    Cooper
    Ray
    Gay
    Sonago
    Lenoir
    Bulovas

    It is conceivable, if not likely that we get ZERO of these guys...that's your WORST case scenario...but is it truly the WORST CASE from a roster management perspective?

    Of that 79, scholarships, we theoretically only have 11 scholarships available for next...assuming normal attrition...maybe 15-16 scholarships available for the 2018 class. You want to talk about a top-heavy, uneven roster.

    Say we miss on all of the guys above, you're looking a still, on the small side 20(ish) scholarships available for the 18' class.

    So going back to that list, what if we get 2 out of those 14 guys...that our coaches really like and feel good about...re-run those numbers for the 18' class again, and you're looking at an even smaller class. What if you get 3, 4, or even 5 or 6 of those guys?

    Does it start to make the staff's "feast or famine" strategy start to make a little more sense with those last 6-7 scholarships?

    Again, this is not to downplay the loss of Odom, as mentioned above, it truly is a loss...but, on days like today, this board really does need some perspective on where we truly stand if the "worst case scenario" happens, and we go 0-fer the rest of the way out.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    25,379
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Tripp McNeely View Post
    Posted something very similar on the 247 board

    Let me preface this by saying that this is not a "we didn't want Aaron Odom" post. He put up video game numbers last year, seemed to have a lot of potential...by all accounts, seemed really wanted by our coaches.

    What this is meant to convey is a little bit of perspective and convey the larger picture of how coaches look at roster management.

    After last night's news, we currently have 79 of our 85 scholarships accounted for or 93% (take T. Reed off there if you want to...it doesn't really hurt the argument). So, that is 93% of our roster filled with players that our coaches really like and feel good about.

    So, what about the other 6-7 schollies? look at our target list right now, there is a lot of feast or famine...likely famine...left on it:

    Jacob Free
    CEH
    Al'Dontre Davis
    DD
    McMath
    Eze
    Carty
    Bateman
    Cooper
    Ray
    Gay
    Sonago
    Lenoir
    Bulovas

    It is conceivable, if not likely that we get ZERO of these guys...that's your WORST case scenario...but is it truly the WORST CASE from a roster management perspective?

    Of that 79, scholarships, we theoretically only have 11 scholarships available for next...assuming normal attrition...maybe 15-16 scholarships available for the 2018 class. You want to talk about a top-heavy, uneven roster.

    Say we miss on all of the guys above, you're looking a still, on the small side 20(ish) scholarships available for the 18' class.

    So going back to that list, what if we get 2 out of those 14 guys...that our coaches really like and feel good about...re-run those numbers for the 18' class again, and you're looking at an even smaller class. What if you get 3, 4, or even 5 or 6 of those guys?

    Does it start to make the staff's "feast or famine" strategy start to make a little more sense with those last 6-7 scholarships?

    Again, this is not to downplay the loss of Odom, as mentioned above, it truly is a loss...but, on days like today, this board really does need some perspective on where we truly stand if the "worst case scenario" happens, and we go 0-fer the rest of the way out.
    Good stuff by you and Hoops! It's good to see something other than the "oh no we suck again" threads. This is logical and well thought out. Appreciate the info!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.