Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 92

Thread: Gridironnow throws out early SEC power rankings

  1. #41
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,630
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by maroonmania View Post
    Yep, didn't take the SEC analysts long to start throwing Grantham under the bus. And he directs that comment to "people that didn't like Sirmon" essentially implying that Grantham likely won't be any better even though Grantham has never had a defense outside of the top 50. I believe we could hire Nick Saban away from Bama and it would somehow be spun as a negative by most of the SEC talking heads.
    Yeah- Saban would be "over the hill" and would have questions about how he handles OC if we went out and hired him right now.

  2. #42
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Starkville
    Posts
    4,175
    vCash
    2069649
    Quote Originally Posted by K9 Avenger View Post
    Once again...trolling your own board for traffic....
    Gut punch.

  3. #43
    Senior Member DancingRabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    2,732
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster View Post
    http://gridironnow.com/2017-sec-power-rankings-early/


    I am almost in complete agreement. State and OM are interchangeable where they are. I would put us ahead because they play at our place and we have the better QB and LB's
    Awesome, what does Barrett Sallee or Saturday Down South predict?

  4. #44
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Starkville
    Posts
    4,175
    vCash
    2069649
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster View Post
    http://gridironnow.com/2017-sec-power-rankings-early/


    I am almost in complete agreement. State and OM are interchangeable where they are. I would put us ahead because they play at our place and we have the better QB and LB's
    I'm calling it now: LSU runs away with the conference.

    1. LSU

    2 bama//auburn/aggies

    5. State/ark

    7. Richard Schwartz

    East

    1. Georgia/flarda

    3. Vandy/USC/U.K.

    6. The adopt-a-highways in east tennesssee/ the art bell fan club.

  5. #45
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    0
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    Because they haven't been clearly better than us in forever, and we will have the far better QB. It's a Mullen offense, if you have the QB, we're freaking good. We'll have the QB.

    You can talk about returning starters all you want, it's what the preseason projections will be based on. And when we're much better than those projections, you'll be just as wrong as they are.
    yet- Ive never been wrong on us in the Mullen Era as far as winning more than I predicted. Not 1 time.

    They were finally better than us in 2016- and will be every bit as good as us in 2017

  6. #46
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    0
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by gravedigger View Post
    Gut punch.
    wtf? Thats just ****ing stupid. Please explain what I have said is wrong?

  7. #47
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    0
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    Because they haven't been clearly better than us in forever, and we will have the far better QB. It's a Mullen offense, if you have the QB, we're freaking good. We'll have the QB.

    You can talk about returning starters all you want, it's what the preseason projections will be based on. And when we're much better than those projections, you'll be just as wrong as they are.
    You apparently dont understand football.- they beat us in 2016

    They return more guys on the OL
    They return more guys on the DL
    they return not 1- but 2 starting QB's

    They are going to be a good team in 2017. They were better than us in 2016. We have the home game and that helps alot- but Kentucky will give us everything we want in 2017. It's going to be a close, hardfought game.

  8. #48
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,608
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster View Post
    You apparently dont understand football.- they beat us in 2016

    They return more guys on the OL
    They return more guys on the DL
    they return not 1- but 2 starting QB's

    They are going to be a good team in 2017. They were better than us in 2016. We have the home game and that helps alot- but Kentucky will give us everything we want in 2017. It's going to be a close, hardfought game.
    Shouldn't you be all over bulldawg28's bet then?

  9. #49
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,211
    vCash
    52060
    We are much better at QB and head coach than Kentucky and will play them at home. We will win by 20+.

  10. #50
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    1,026
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by bulldawg28 View Post
    BS...Kentucky just lost their best playmaker on offense and key WR. Their Qb isn't even a SEC caliber. But by all means keep believing the hype. My bet still stands and you've been hiding. Man up
    What's the best? RP why don't you bet him?

  11. #51
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    0
    vCash
    2610
    whats the bet?

  12. #52
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    0
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by Quaoarsking View Post
    We are much better at QB and head coach than Kentucky and will play them at home. We will win by 20+.
    I'll bet you 1.000 dollars right now if you will give me Kentucky +20 right now- what say you?

  13. #53
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,694
    vCash
    3100
    I actually think us and UK were about even last season, and the final records of each team and head to head result both show that as well. Both teams should also be a lot better next year. We'll see which one improves more. I give us the nod on talent, so we'll see if the Grantham hire can push us over the top.

  14. #54
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    0
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by HSVDawg View Post
    I actually think us and UK were about even last season, and the final records of each team and head to head result both show that as well. Both teams should also be a lot better next year. We'll see which one improves more. I give us the nod on talent, so we'll see if the Grantham hire can push us over the top.
    good post- thanks. 100% agree

  15. #55
    Senior Member IMissJack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,099
    vCash
    3100
    I personally think the Aggies are going to be worse in 17. Myles Garrett gone, almost all their best receivers, except for Kirk (who returned the punt for TD against us). QB is gone, and Sumlin has not had a good history of QB's outside of Manziel's own talent. Most of the others transferred before playing enough to judge...

    ETA: They have a lot of stars in their lineup, but Sumlin has not put them all together. If they finish like this year or worse Sumlin is gone. And, that is scary because they may actually get lucky on a hire one of these days.
    Last edited by IMissJack; 01-15-2017 at 10:37 PM.

  16. #56
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,211
    vCash
    52060
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster View Post
    I'll bet you 1.000 dollars right now if you will give me Kentucky +20 right now- what say you?
    I don't play pointspreads - teams play to win the game, not to worry about margins. But I do expect us to beat Kentucky by around 3 TDs, not counting whatever goes on in garbage time.

  17. #57
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    0
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by Quaoarsking View Post
    I don't play pointspreads - teams play to win the game, not to worry about margins. But I do expect us to beat Kentucky by around 3 TDs, not counting whatever goes on in garbage time.
    I see. I'm in agreement we are the favorites at home in 2017- but you are delusional saying we will beat a team that was better than us in 2016 and returns more than us in 2017 w2ill lose to us by 20+. I'll take any bet you want +20

    You are taking the weasel way out with the 3 TD BS

  18. #58
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    40,630
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by IMissJack View Post
    I personally think the Aggies are going to be worse in 17. Myles Garrett gone, almost all their best receivers, except for Kirk (who returned the punt for TD against us). QB is gone, and Sumlin has not had a good history of QB's outside of Manziel's own talent. Most of the others transferred before playing enough to judge...

    ETA: They have a lot of stars in their lineup, but Sumlin has not put them all together. If they finish like this year or worse Sumlin is gone. And, that is scary because they may actually get lucky on a hire one of these days.
    You mean returned a punt against us after the officials missed an obvious block in the back call.

  19. #59
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    0
    vCash
    2610
    We have beaten Kentucky by 3 TD's once since 2000

  20. #60
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,211
    vCash
    52060
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster View Post
    We have beaten Kentucky by 3 TD's once since 2000
    And that 1 time (2015) was the only other time we had them at home AND the gap between in head coach/QB between us and them is as big as it will be in 2017.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.