-
Senior Member
Sanctions effect
What would Freeze and staff firing, players allowed to transfer and a loss of 30 scholies over 3 years do to that program? How long would it take them to recover from that? Is that a reasonable penalty for academic fraud, LOIC and paying multiple players?
-
Originally Posted by
phatdog
What would Freeze and staff firing, players allowed to transfer and a loss of 30 scholies over 3 years do to that program? How long would it take them to recover from that? Is that a reasonable penalty for academic fraud, LOIC and paying multiple players?
It'd take Ole Miss a decade to recover, minimum... and they'd have to cheat again to do it...
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
-
Originally Posted by
TUSK
It'd take Ole Miss a decade to recover, minimum... and they'd have to cheat again to do it...
No doubt. Would be devastation that would take longer than our lifetimes to recover from.
-
-
Originally Posted by
TUSK
It'd take Ole Miss a decade to recover, minimum... and they'd have to cheat again to do it...
I think that is spot on. USC hasn't sniffed a title run and they are one of the elite Top 10 programs in the country. If UNM gets that level of sanctions with this first NOA the fans better hope there is not a second one coming as a repeat offender.
-
Oxofrd would be a crater. Think worse than the Croom years level crater. That school's football program would be less than USM.
-
-
Swing for the fence.
Would would 40 over 4 and a two year bowl ban do?
-
Stupid question, so would 30 over 3 put their maximum scholarships at 55 per year or would it be 75 for 3 years?
-
Originally Posted by
starkvegasdawg
that makes me hotter than margaret thatcher naked on a cold day
-
Originally Posted by
Political Hack
Swing for the fence.
Would would 40 over 4 and a two year bowl ban do?
uh, I dunno... prolly the same thing the last 40 years did?
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
-
Originally Posted by
archdog
Stupid question, so would 30 over 3 put their maximum scholarships at 55 per year or would it be 75 for 3 years?
I think it would be a declining number each year of I'm not mistaken based on the current number on scholarship. So I would guess 75 year one, 65 year 2 then 55 total year 3.
-
Senior Member
I thought 30 over 3 was the number they could sign each year was reduced by 10 for 3 years.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by
Bucky Dog
I think it would be a declining number each year of I'm not mistaken based on the current number on scholarship. So I would guess 75 year one, 65 year 2 then 55 total year 3.
Most are declining #s like you said but is it because the # you can sign or just reducing by total scholarships each year. Big difference...
If it is 30 over 3...Does this limit you to signing 15 each year. Which is a difference than just 75 one year, 65 the next, and so on.
For example, if you have 10 non senior players transfer because of some reason(let's say bowl ban) and you have 20 seniors that first year...you are down to 55 scholarships and can only add 15 for a total of 70. Wasn't USC like this?
-
I take it as you can only sign 15 each year to scholarship,but I'm sure if someone transfers that opens that scholly as well but not sure how all of that works.
-
Senior Member
I would think their academic enrollment would go down as well. Lots will not want to go to OM to watch them suck. Again.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.
Reply With Quote
