Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: What would Belichick do if he coached our team this week?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    16,092
    vCash
    2510

    What would Belichick do if he coached our team this week?

    I'll tell you. Earlier this season when the Pats played the Bills and their great run defense, the Pats went 5 wide on nearly every down. They ran 76 plays. 59 passes and 15 rushes. They killed em with the quick passes and the Bills barely laid a hand on Brady. #PTGDF

  2. #2
    Senior Member Interpolation_Dawg_EX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,382
    vCash
    62623
    [QUOTE=HoopsDawg;445473 What would Belichick do if he coached our team this week?[/QUOTE]
    Send a spy or a drone to Tuscaloosa to spy on bama and then claim greatness when we beat them...

  3. #3
    Senior Member starkvegasdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Eye of the Storm
    Posts
    22,777
    vCash
    3275
    Deflate the footballs and and wire Saban's headset into our pressbox.

  4. #4
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,095
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    I'll tell you. Earlier this season when the Pats played the Bills and their great run defense, the Pats went 5 wide on nearly every down. They ran 76 plays. 59 passes and 15 rushes. They killed em with the quick passes and the Bills barely laid a hand on Brady. #PTGDF
    We need to take a page from Ole Miss and from Manziel's A&M teams and do exactly what you prescribe. In A&M's 2012-2013 games with Alabama, and in Ole Miss' games the last 2 years, each of those opponents threw more than 30 times on Bama. LSU just threw 19 times Saturday, and we saw what happened.

    While Ole Miss and A&M were technically balanced in their play calling, a lot of the runs were unconventional. Manziel obviously ran a ton, and both Kelly and Wallace ran a decent amount as well, along with runs from guys like Cody Core, Liggins, Treadwell, etc.

    If we have any success running the ball Saturday, it will have to first be opened up by passing. We won't establish the run early in that game. We must come out throwing and only if that is successful will we find some running lanes. And Dak is going to have to get outside the pocket and make some plays with his feet. But I think most of that should come on designed passes, not designed QB runs.

    I would like to see us throw the ball around 40 times Saturday. I'd like to see around 10 Dak runs and nobody else to carry the ball more than 5 times. We'll need to see a wide variety in the passing game. We'll need some bubble screens, we'll need some RB screens, and we'll need to take a deep shot here and there, especially with Wilson. Dak's intermediate passing game has improved by quite a bit over the last couple years, and he'll have to have success doing that.

    I would go with 4-5 wide on almost every play, and on most of the 4-wide plays, I'd only have the RB in to block primarily.

  5. #5
    Senior Member thf24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,543
    vCash
    3200
    The thing that worries me about that gameplan is that we don't have the Pats' o-line. I know we're pretty good at pass protection, and that the idea is to get rid of the ball quickly, but I still don't like going minimum protection often against Bama's front.

  6. #6
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,095
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by thf24 View Post
    The thing that worries me about that gameplan is that we don't have the Pats' o-line. I know we're pretty good at pass protection, and that the idea is to get rid of the ball quickly, but I still don't like going minimum protection often against Bama's front.
    We have to pick our poison to some degree. I'd love to have 2 TE's and a RB in to block while also running 5 wide, but that's not possible. We're just not going to beat Bama by trying to block them long enough to either run it or to get 1 or 2 WR open. We have to spread them out and get rid of the ball quickly. Keep them on their heels, go quickly on offense, especially after completed passes, and try to run as many plays as possible.

    The teams who try to slow it down against Bama and reduce the number of plays always lose. The teams who push tempo and throw are the only ones who ever have much success. It may seem counterintuitive to play more risky against a defense like theirs, but it is the best strategy.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Starkville
    Posts
    4,175
    vCash
    2069649
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    I'll tell you. Earlier this season when the Pats played the Bills and their great run defense, the Pats went 5 wide on nearly every down. They ran 76 plays. 59 passes and 15 rushes. They killed em with the quick passes and the Bills barely laid a hand on Brady. #PTGDF
    However many passes we throw, the ball needs to come out quickly and thro it away or run if the second checkdown isnt open.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,269
    vCash
    3100
    This reminds me of the debate they were having on ESPN. How would the Pats offense do against the 85 Bears 46 defense? One of the analyst said the Pats would spread them out and you wouldn't have a 46 defense anymore.
    That's what I hope we do, spread there ass out, loosen up that front 7 and go up tempo. I think Dak could find some running lanes from that formation. On D we have to slow Henery down and make Coker beat us. If he only has to throw it 20 times, we're gonna be in trouble.

  9. #9
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,095
    vCash
    3000
    Their front 7 is ridiculous, so we need to take them out of the game if possible. How do you do that? By spreading them out 5 wide and getting rid of the ball quickly. It's as simple as that. Not simple to execute, but the game plan shouldn't be more complicated than that.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Dental Dawg33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Brandon, MS
    Posts
    440
    vCash
    3079
    Hand the Browns taser guns and stop Henry early. If we don't keep that beast in check he is going to maul us

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    16,092
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    Their front 7 is ridiculous, so we need to take them out of the game if possible. How do you do that? By spreading them out 5 wide and getting rid of the ball quickly. It's as simple as that. Not simple to execute, but the game plan shouldn't be more complicated than that.
    Exactly. That's what Belichick does. He takes away his opponents strength. Bama's strength is their run defense. Spread it out and throw it. I fear Mullen thinking that we need to be balanced.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    16,092
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by thf24 View Post
    The thing that worries me about that gameplan is that we don't have the Pats' o-line. I know we're pretty good at pass protection, and that the idea is to get rid of the ball quickly, but I still don't like going minimum protection often against Bama's front.
    Better that than slamming Shumpert and Holloway up the gut. Or getting Dak hurt. You just can't run on Bama.

  13. #13
    Founder of Summer's Eve
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    8,447
    vCash
    3663
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    Exactly. That's what Belichick does. He takes away his opponents strength. Bama's strength is their run defense. Spread it out and throw it. I fear Mullen thinking that we need to be balanced.
    I fear for Holliways life this week if Dan's hardheadedness continues.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,454
    vCash
    4835
    Cheat. Cheat big time. Wait to see if the nfl/ncaa had anything to say about it.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    9,086
    vCash
    3083
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    Their front 7 is ridiculous, so we need to take them out of the game if possible. How do you do that? By spreading them out 5 wide and getting rid of the ball quickly. It's as simple as that. Not simple to execute, but the game plan shouldn't be more complicated than that.
    I believe they'd quickly adjust to that. It'll be interesting to see how we handle it. I bet whatever Dan comes up with works!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.