Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 83

Thread: Chris Doring say

  1. #21
    Senior Member War Machine Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    N5 London Colney
    Posts
    10,475
    vCash
    3921
    Quote Originally Posted by RC3 View Post
    Hopefully it's not. This year seems like it's harder to get any info out of practice. It seems to be really really hush hush; more so than in years past. I find it a little strange
    I take it as a good thing. Mullen is playing it very close to the vest. Generally when word leaks out, it isn't good news.
    It's the roller coaster of hope that this program keeps us on that makes it hell being a State fan. - CadaverDawg, 10/15/22


  2. #22
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,091
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Not good if true then. Don't see shump as an outside runner.
    There's no reason for anyone to think it is true. This is a guy having to come up with a reason for his 6-6 prediction for us.

  3. #23
    Senior Member engie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    8,518
    vCash
    3700
    The entire interior has a ton of experience and have been good.

    Chris Jones, Nick James, and Cory Thomas giving them some trouble in practice is good for them and hardly indicative of what they are going to see week in and week out in the SEC. Our guys are all taught the line positions from the inside out -- it's how hev likes to teach it. And we are thinking about red shirting the #1 OL out of JUCO.

    Sorry -- shoe doesn't fit.

  4. #24
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Haha, y'all think Doering was told something like that by people "inside the program"? Bull. Shit.

    So we told a nobody from Florida, but DIDN'T tell McElroy, or any of the legit SECN guys?

    Let me tell you what happened. Bo Bounds talked to Doering about us having to replace some O-Lineman, and that transformed into "people inside MSU's program say the OL will be down".

    Y'all are crazy if you take these comments to heart, and I'm usually one of our most skeptical fans that keeps my expectations tempered. I DO think our fan base needs to temper things slightly, but not Bc of Chris effing Doering. He's a nobody that knows nothing.

    Our OL will be fine, Bc it's about scheme and assignments, not blowing people off the ball. So we'll stay fine at OL. We will likely take a small step back in our DL, simply due to depth, but our OL is FINE. Besides, nothing helps an OL like a good passing game, a dual threat QB, and the ability to be multiple at RB.

    The OP in this thread is very misleading too...that's not what Doering said. But again, who cares what Doering said?
    Last edited by CadaverDawg; 08-29-2015 at 09:43 AM.

  5. #25
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,091
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg View Post
    The offensive line is why I've taken a wait and see approach this year from the start. If it's not very good, we will struggle to have a winning season. It's the key to the team, as always.
    While this is probably true, I can't really think of a time where our OL really struggled under Mullen. His system just doesn't rely on OL domination at the LOS.

  6. #26
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,091
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    Haha, y'all think Doering was told something like that by people "inside the program"? Bull. Shit.

    So we told a nobody from Florida, but DIDN'T tell McElroy, or any of the legit SECN guys?

    Let me tell you what happened. Bo Bounds talked to Doering about us having to replace some O-Lineman, and that transformed into "people inside MSU's program say the OL will be down".

    Y'all are crazy if you take these comments to heart, and I'm usually one of our most skeptical fans that keeps my expectations tempered. I DO think our fan base needs to temper things slightly, but not Bc of Chris effing Doering. He's a nobody that knows nothing.
    Agreed.

  7. #27
    Senior Member War Machine Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    N5 London Colney
    Posts
    10,475
    vCash
    3921
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    While this is probably true, I can't really think of a time where our OL really struggled under Mullen. His system just doesn't rely on OL domination at the LOS.
    Exactly. Someone will say "2011" but injuries were the killer that year. Our blocking scheme is about creating angles, not dominating your man. But we have some bad mfers that could dominate their man if we asked them to do it. Our OL is going to be good.
    It's the roller coaster of hope that this program keeps us on that makes it hell being a State fan. - CadaverDawg, 10/15/22


  8. #28
    Senior Member BeardoMSU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The gettin' place
    Posts
    18,860
    vCash
    53100
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    Haha, y'all think Doering was told something like that by people "inside the program"? Bull. Shit.

    So we told a nobody from Florida, but DIDN'T tell McElroy, or any of the legit SECN guys?

    Let me tell you what happened. Bo Bounds talked to Doering about us having to replace some O-Lineman, and that transformed into "people inside MSU's program say the OL will be down".

    Y'all are crazy if you take these comments to heart, and I'm usually one of our most skeptical fans that keeps my expectations tempered. I DO think our fan base needs to temper things slightly, but not Bc of Chris effing Doering. He's a nobody that knows nothing.
    Fu(king Aye, Cadaver.


  9. #29
    Senior Member RC3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,331
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg View Post
    The offensive line is why I've taken a wait and see approach this year from the start. If it's not very good, we will struggle to have a winning season. It's the key to the team, as always.
    This is where I am as well. If they turn out to be below mediocre, we will be 6-6. If they can put together an above average performance, we have a chance to win a championship
    my cowbell is louder than yours

  10. #30
    Senior Member DancingRabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    2,732
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by War Machine Dawg View Post
    This. He's throwing shit against the wall to see what sticks. I'm betting our OL is better this year than last. We're bigger, stronger, and more athletic.
    I agree. It's a new group, so I'm a little nervous about the LSU game. By the Auburn game and beyond we will be fine.

  11. #31
    Senior Member RC3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,331
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by engie View Post
    The entire interior has a ton of experience and have been good.

    Chris Jones, Nick James, and Cory Thomas giving them some trouble in practice is good for them and hardly indicative of what they are going to see week in and week out in the SEC. Our guys are all taught the line positions from the inside out -- it's how hev likes to teach it. And we are thinking about red shirting the #1 OL out of JUCO.

    Sorry -- shoe doesn't fit.
    Our OL has to go up against at least two elite D lines
    my cowbell is louder than yours

  12. #32
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by engie View Post
    The entire interior has a ton of experience and have been good.

    Chris Jones, Nick James, and Cory Thomas giving them some trouble in practice is good for them and hardly indicative of what they are going to see week in and week out in the SEC. Our guys are all taught the line positions from the inside out -- it's how hev likes to teach it. And we are thinking about red shirting the #1 OL out of JUCO.

    Sorry -- shoe doesn't fit.
    Exactly.

    No offense to RC3 (I'm not saying he didn't hear that. He's a great poster), but until I hear that from multiple people...which I'm actually hearing the opposite, that we've looked good on the OL....I'll have to think this info is not accurate. They could have had a bad scrimmage or something, but they'll be ready to roll this season.

  13. #33
    Senior Member RC3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,331
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    Exactly.

    No offense to RC3 (I'm not saying he didn't hear that. He's a great poster), but until I hear that from multiple people...which I'm actually hearing the opposite, that we've looked good on the OL....I'll have to think this info is not accurate. They could have had a bad scrimmage or something, but they'll be ready to roll this season.
    I hope I'm wrong as well. Like I said, I have no personal knoweldge on the subject. I've heard it from two sources. Neither are coaches. Only fans that know the game. Plus they still have two full weeks to gel before LSU. Southern miss is a great opportunity to get ready
    my cowbell is louder than yours

  14. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,193
    vCash
    3100
    The SECN gurus are basing their projection on our losing 3 starters on the OL. Those 3 starters were pretty good most of the season, but certainly not great. Ole Miss proved that. I think they can be adequately replaced with guys just as good, if not better.

  15. #35
    Senior Member engie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    8,518
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by RC3 View Post
    Our OL has to go up against at least two elite D lines
    We playing those two teams six times each? Read what I actually said...

    The OL is going to be good enough to give us a top 5 offense in the history of the SEC and what very well could be the best ever in the conference in terms of yardage per game. It was basically that good last year already.

    I just don't get it.

    "MSU doesn't recruit well enough to get there". Then we get there.
    "Well, no way MSU can replace those 2 2*s and one walkon" -- none of which the NFL found good enough to actually draft -- all of which are being replaced by more highly rated players with higher ceilings -- all of which have at least 3 years in the program.

    "It's a huge blow to MSU losing starting right tackle Damien Robinson to a knee injury -- the OL is one position they absolutely couldn't afford any injuries" -- then Damien Robinson comes back healthy the next year and can't crack the two-deep and that's ignored by the same people that made it such a huge deal the first year.

    The Rankin thing is beyond obvious...

    All circumstantial evidence points to our OL being at least as good as it was last year -- and deeper.

    This stuff is not hard to see and project. How many years in a row are guys going to worry about this before they just accept that Hevesy is going to have a good enough OL every year? If the defense gets it together on a 2010 level -- we are going to have a very, very special season.
    Last edited by engie; 08-29-2015 at 10:09 AM.

  16. #36
    Senior Member RC3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,331
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by engie View Post
    We playing those two teams six times each?
    No and luckily both are at home. And extremely crucial if we want to get to ATL
    my cowbell is louder than yours

  17. #37
    Senior Member RC3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,331
    vCash
    3200
    Engie I read what you said. The fact that they may be struggling with our DL shouldn't necessarily be an indictment on their ability. I get that. My point was that I think they will see at least two DLs better than ours and those are must win games to get to ATL

    I'm not saying that I think they are bad. I'm
    Not saying that I think they are good. We just simply must wait and see. I hope you are right. That they exceed last years group (they will need to to get us to ATL) and that we have the most productive offense the SEC has ever seen. It's
    Not reasonable imo to have that expectation right now until we see them perform

  18. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,276
    vCash
    2510
    LSUs DL, like last year, isn't that great. It's definitely not what it has been prior to last year. They also lost their starting DEs. Maybe Coach O coaches em up, but that remains to be seen. I don't see our OL against their DL as the deciding factor. It's going to be the other way around and whether or not we can contain Fournette and their running attack.

  19. #39
    Senior Member RC3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,331
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by Covercorner2 View Post
    LSUs DL, like last year, isn't that great. It's definitely not what it has been prior to last year. They also lost their starting DEs. Maybe Coach O coaches em up, but that remains to be seen. I don't see our OL against their DL as the deciding factor. It's going to be the other way around and whether or not we can contain Fournette and their running attack.
    Agreed. They will be good but that's not who I was referring to when I stated there are at least two elite d lines on our schedule. That would be bama and ole miss (duck and cover as you guys throw rotten fruit at me)
    my cowbell is louder than yours

  20. #40
    Senior Member TrapGame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    13,179
    vCash
    4975
    If Ifyouonlyknew says it, then I'll believe it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.