Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23

Thread: For those of you that are interested... RE: Bammer QB

  1. 06-11-2015, 06:19 PM #1
    TUSK
    TUSK is offline
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,203
    vCash
    1000619

    For those of you that are interested... RE: Bammer QB

    Word in Tuskville has it that RSFr Cornwell may supplant Coker at the QB position...
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-11-2015, 06:31 PM #2
    msstate7
    msstate7 is offline
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    72,584
    vCash
    10439
    If that happens, I wonder how that will affect hurts and pass
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 06-11-2015, 06:40 PM #3
    TUSK
    TUSK is offline
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,203
    vCash
    1000619
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    If that happens, I wonder how that will affect hurts and pass
    good question... Hell, the way we freakin' go through QBs, we need both of em to sign....
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 06-11-2015, 06:59 PM #4
    bluelightstar
    bluelightstar is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,577
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by TUSK View Post
    Word in Tuskville has it that RSFr Cornwell may supplant Coker at the QB position...
    If true, did Jimbo pull off the biggest con in a few years. "Barely lost out to Jameis."
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 06-11-2015, 07:06 PM #5
    Coach34
    Coach34 is offline
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    30,402
    vCash
    17200
    That would be fantastic. Getting a R-Fr in our stadium increases our chances
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 06-11-2015, 07:07 PM #6
    SDDawg
    SDDawg is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,607
    vCash
    10296
    Perfect. May get Hurts back in the fold eventually.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 06-11-2015, 07:15 PM #7
    CadaverDawg
    CadaverDawg is offline
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    That's bad news for Bammer. Saban's O needs a veteran game manager. I'm pumped if this is true. Manny won't let a freshman come in our house and get comfortable...and our fans/cowbells sure won't either.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 06-11-2015, 08:08 PM #8
    TUSK
    TUSK is offline
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,203
    vCash
    1000619
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    That's bad news for Bammer. Saban's O needs a veteran game manager. I'm pumped if this is true. Manny won't let a freshman come in our house and get comfortable...and our fans/cowbells sure won't either.
    actually, every "rookie" starting QB under Saban has done fairly decent:

    '09 McElroy won the Natty
    '11 McCarron won the Natty
    '14 Sims "runner up" to the Natty

    but your point is well taken.
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 06-11-2015, 08:54 PM #9
    STATEBALLIN
    STATEBALLIN is offline
    Senior Member STATEBALLIN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    148
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by TUSK View Post
    Word in Tuskville has it that RSFr Cornwell may supplant Coker at the QB position...
    I call BS. No way that can be determined in June. Now if you said this about 3 weeks into August I would be interested.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 06-11-2015, 09:09 PM #10
    Bass Chaser
    Bass Chaser is offline
    Senior Member Bass Chaser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gluckstadt
    Posts
    1,074
    vCash
    5300
    Quote Originally Posted by TUSK View Post
    actually, every "rookie" starting QB under Saban has done fairly decent:

    '09 McElroy won the Natty
    '11 McCarron won the Natty
    '14 Sims "runner up" to the Natty

    but your point is well taken.
    Don't you mean "runner up to the runner up". Bama didn't make it to the NC game.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 06-11-2015, 09:16 PM #11
    TUSK
    TUSK is offline
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,203
    vCash
    1000619
    Quote Originally Posted by Bass Chaser View Post
    Don't you mean "runner up to the runner up". Bama didn't make it to the NC game.
    that's why I put it in quotes... I feel they were the 2nd best team in the CFP... JMO...
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 06-11-2015, 09:17 PM #12
    TUSK
    TUSK is offline
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,203
    vCash
    1000619
    Quote Originally Posted by STATEBALLIN View Post
    I call BS. No way that can be determined in June. Now if you said this about 3 weeks into August I would be interested.
    It's just rumblings coming out of Spring Practice... and I doubt anything has be determined as of yet...
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 06-11-2015, 09:28 PM #13
    defiantdog
    defiantdog is offline
    Senior Member defiantdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Southeast
    Posts
    5,679
    vCash
    7213
    Quote Originally Posted by TUSK View Post
    Word in Tuskville has it that RSFr Cornwell may supplant Coker at the QB position...
    I wouldn't go that far. Cornwell barely held his own in Spring practice. Coker will get the start but problems in paradise for sure.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 06-11-2015, 09:30 PM #14
    defiantdog
    defiantdog is offline
    Senior Member defiantdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Southeast
    Posts
    5,679
    vCash
    7213
    Quote Originally Posted by TUSK View Post
    It's just rumblings coming out of Spring Practice... and I doubt anything has be determined as of yet...
    There's more than rumblings. Coker isn't starter material..... but none of the other guys have stepped up.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 06-11-2015, 09:52 PM #15
    CadaverDawg
    CadaverDawg is offline
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by TUSK View Post
    actually, every "rookie" starting QB under Saban has done fairly decent:

    '09 McElroy won the Natty
    '11 McCarron won the Natty
    '14 Sims "runner up" to the Natty

    but your point is well taken.
    None of those QB's were "rookies". They had all been in the system 2+ years. This guy hasn't. Good try though
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 06-11-2015, 10:02 PM #16
    TUSK
    TUSK is offline
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,203
    vCash
    1000619
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    None of those QB's were "rookies". They had all been in the system 2+ years. This guy hasn't. Good try though
    you're right this is Cornwell's 2nd year, I just meant "1st year starters".... but you're right, those guys had been on campus a bit longer...

    I just gotta believe if Kiffin can turn a RB in to the best QB in the conference (statistically speaking), surely he can turn a true QB with all the tools in to a "serviceable" QB even if he is "young"....

    here's to hoping....
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 06-11-2015, 10:59 PM #17
    Schultzy
    Schultzy is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,545
    vCash
    2889
    Quote Originally Posted by TUSK View Post
    that's why I put it in quotes... I feel they were the 2nd best team in the CFP... JMO...
    That doesn't make any sense... but you have won some naty's so it doesn't have to.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 06-12-2015, 07:35 AM #18
    CadaverDawg
    CadaverDawg is offline
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,673
    vCash
    3002900
    Quote Originally Posted by TUSK View Post
    you're right this is Cornwell's 2nd year, I just meant "1st year starters".... but you're right, those guys had been on campus a bit longer...

    I just gotta believe if Kiffin can turn a RB in to the best QB in the conference (statistically speaking), surely he can turn a true QB with all the tools in to a "serviceable" QB even if he is "young"....

    here's to hoping....
    Dak was the best QB in the league. Do rushing stats count?

    And yes, he can be "serviceable", but I thought you guys were shooting for a Title? You ain't winning a Title with a "serviceable" freshman QB IMO.

    You are a master at the back handed compliment though, Tusk. Slipping in typical Bammer comments while surrounding them with phrases where you're attempting to sound nice and complimentary. Ha, everybody sees them....you're fooling no one.
    Last edited by CadaverDawg; 06-12-2015 at 10:51 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 06-12-2015, 09:40 AM #19
    TUSK
    TUSK is offline
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,203
    vCash
    1000619
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    Dak was the best QB in the league. Do rushing stats count?

    And yes, he can be "serviceable", but I thought you guys were shooting for a Title? You ain't winning a Title with a "serviceable" freshman QB IMO.

    You are a master at the back handed compliment though, Tusk. Slipping in typical Bammer comments while surrounding them with phrases where you're attempting to sound nice and complimentary. Ha, every sees them.
    You are too kind
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 06-12-2015, 10:26 AM #20
    Pollodawg
    Pollodawg is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,715
    vCash
    3700
    It's June. There's no way to know right now how Bama's QB depth chart will look come Fall. Hit me up again in August. And as far as early preseason prognostications on the QB position, Simms looked awful in their Spring Game last season, and he was a couple of plays from playing for a NC by season's end.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.