Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: LA Hunter Killed in MS

  1. #1
    Super Moderator BeastMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    7,504
    vCash
    3100

    LA Hunter Killed in MS

    I want you guys opinions on this. It was a private club and the 2 guys knew each other but weren't hunting together. Both over 50. One guy gets out of stand and leaves his orange in the stand. As he's walking the other guy shoots and kills him.

    I've read on other boards folks saying the gentlemen who didn't wear his orange made a big mistake. I think the guy that shot made a bigger one. I feel like if you are a sportsman, it is s privilege and not a right. To maintain that privilege you need to obey certain guidelines. If you can't see well enough in the woods to determine what it is you're shooting, you don't take the shot. At a minimum I think the shooter should have his hunting privlages revoked for life and he should get sued for wrongful death. I Can't decide if I think he should be charged criminally.

    I know if I run over someone in my boat, even if it's an accident, I could be held responsible for my negligence. What do you guys think? Am I overrreacting or is shooting a person while deer hunting inexcusable?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,412
    vCash
    2623
    There's plenty of blame to go around, but I think you shouldn't shoot at things you can't clearly identify.

    Stuff like this is why I don't hunt anymore.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    894
    vCash
    3200
    You are 100% correct. Anyone who hunts should know that you never pull the trigger unless you are sure of your target. Even my 9 year old knows this. Hell, he won't even put his finger on the trigger until he is sure of his target.

    People forget to wear their orange all the time, especially on private land. Yes, it is a big mistake but there is no comparison for which mistake is greater.

  4. #4
    Super Moderator BeastMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    7,504
    vCash
    3100
    Do yall think he should get criminally prosecuted? If I don't see a stop sign, run it and hit a pedestrian, I'm pretty sure I'd get charged with manslaughter.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,830
    vCash
    3400
    Quote Originally Posted by BeastMan View Post
    Do yall think he should get criminally prosecuted? If I don't see a stop sign, run it and hit a pedestrian, I'm pretty sure I'd get charged with manslaughter.
    No you wouldn't, not unless there was some aggravating factor like drinking and driving or texting and driving that takes it out of the realm of ordinary negligence. That's a lot different from this though. This guy took a shot without knowing what he was shooting at (provided it wasn't some crazy scenario where he was shooting at something he could see and hit the hunter behind it when he missed, which would be hard to do with a safe shot from a stand). That's reckless enough that it might arise to manslaughter. He could have been shooting a bear or mountain lion for all he knew. i think he certainly would have been charged if he had recklessly shot an endangered animal. I don't know if he'll be prosecuted but it seems crazy that a dumb shot that killed a protected animal would result in prosecution but one that killed a man wouldn't.

    If he's sued civilly, he will lose. The only question is whether not wearing the orange would reduce the damages he has to pay. I suspect it will by a very minor amount. As people have said, not wearing orange is dumb, but it's not even in the same ballpark as taking a shot at an 'animal' when you don't know what you're shooting at.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,412
    vCash
    2623
    I don't know. It's a tough situation for me to try to judge.

    Several years ago, a few of my dad's friends went rabbit hunting. One friend shoots another friend in the face permanently blinding him in both eyes. If I remember correctly, the shooting was ruled an accident and no criminal charges were filed.

    On the other hand, I think it's very hard to tell a widow that someone accidentally shot blindly into the woods and killed your husband.

    Tough situation.

    I would like to know what the law actually says and how it applies to this situation.

  7. #7
    Senior Member SpeckleDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Coast
    Posts
    1,081
    vCash
    3100
    It blows my mind every time I read about another one of these incidents. Of course it's a good idea to wear orange, but YOU HAVE TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE SHOOTING.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,830
    vCash
    3400
    Quote Originally Posted by MSUDawg4Life View Post
    I don't know. It's a tough situation for me to try to judge.

    Several years ago, a few of my dad's friends went rabbit hunting. One friend shoots another friend in the face permanently blinding him in both eyes. If I remember correctly, the shooting was ruled an accident and no criminal charges were filed.

    On the other hand, I think it's very hard to tell a widow that someone accidentally shot blindly into the woods and killed your husband.

    Tough situation.

    I would like to know what the law actually says and how it applies to this situation.
    Big difference between something like rabbit or bird hunting, where you can make a mistake because you are reacting and shooting quickly versus deer hunting.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,412
    vCash
    2623
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnson85 View Post
    Big difference between something like rabbit or bird hunting, where you can make a mistake because you are reacting and shooting quickly versus deer hunting.
    Well, there are safety rules that apply to that type of hunting too. Break the rules and somebody gets hurt.

    The question is whether breaking those safety rules amounts to an accident or negligence.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    11,830
    vCash
    3400
    Quote Originally Posted by MSUDawg4Life View Post
    Well, there are safety rules that apply to that type of hunting too. Break the rules and somebody gets hurt.

    The question is whether breaking those safety rules amounts to an accident or negligence.
    It almost certainly amounts to negligence. You owe extreme care in something like a bird hunt where you are walking with a gun next to other hunters and shooting quickly. The only exception would be if something like a dog jumps into you or you step into a hole that was completely covered with grass; maybe then it wouldn't be negligence.

    But the average accident in something like a pheasant hunt probably doesn't rise to a criminal matter, whereas the deer hunting accident where a hunter intentionally shoots at something he can't identify, that seems like it would likely be so reckless, it would rise to a criminal matter.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Covington, Louisiana
    Posts
    2,273
    vCash
    700722589
    Quote Originally Posted by MSUDawg4Life View Post
    There's plenty of blame to go around, but I think you shouldn't shoot at things you can't clearly identify.

    Stuff like this is why I don't hunt anymore.
    THIS^^^I love hunting and both were wrong. Know the stupidity of your fellow hunters, and never take off your orange. Never shoot unless you can CLEARLY see your target. That fool needs to be able to tell if it is a Doe or Buck and count points before shooting. Short story. I was in a hunting camp and A guy said he heard movement in some bushes and shot. I walked over and backhanded him out of his chair, and told him that could of been any one of us. I make if a point of never hunting public land due to the stupidity of some people. THE MORE I TYPE THE MADDER I GET AT THAT SHOOTER.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,368
    vCash
    32000
    Firing at an unidentifiable target is THE most egregious and irresponsible act of any hunter. Not wearing orange is also irresponsible, dumb and against the law. But it doesn't compare to the other act. What's strange is, I'm not sure there is actually a law on the books regarding identifying your target while in the field but you can receive a violation for failure to wear the correct amount of hunter orange.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,015
    vCash
    3200
    I will be 72 the day after Christmas. When I was around 14/16 i nearly shot a man who was already a Doctor while duck hunting. the ducks had already gotten near the water and he was across from me. I saw him not to long ago and brought that incident up. He and I both have never forgotten it. Thank God I did not kill him.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3,548
    vCash
    3670

    There iis no excuse none for shooting someone deer hunting orange or no orange. He

    Quote Originally Posted by Percho View Post
    I will be 72 the day after Christmas. When I was around 14/16 i nearly shot a man who was already a Doctor while duck hunting. the ducks had already gotten near the water and he was across from me. I saw him not to long ago and brought that incident up. He and I both have never forgotten it. Thank God I did not kill him.
    should lose his license forever at the very minimum. I don't think he will be charged unless they could do so for him being a complete fool and dumbass.

  15. #15
    Senior Member DownwardDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Covington County Mississippi
    Posts
    10,753
    vCash
    1540588
    You have to know it's a deer. You have to know whether it's a doe or a buck. You have to know if it's a legal buck. You have to know what part of the deer's body you are deciding to shoot. Is the deer quartering away, quartering towards you, or broadside? Too many variables to accidentally shoot another human by mistaking him for a deer. Now, if he shot at a deer and missed and the bullet traveled through the woods and hit someone not wearing orange, that's a different story.

  16. #16
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,203
    vCash
    1000619
    In my opinion, if you pull the trigger, and hit your target, and it happens to be another person, it's either:
    A) Homicide
    B) Justifiable Homicide
    C) Negligent Homicide


    Orange or no orange.
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.