NET #42

[msstate7]

Down 3 spots. NW became a Q1 win.

[msstate7]

North Texas is #81. Be nice if they could to #75 with a couple wins in the AAC tourney

[msstate7]

South Carolina lost 2 spots to #49.

Does the NET formula not give you a full reward/penalty for OT win/loss?

[maroonmania]

South Carolina lost 2 spots to #49.

Does the NET formula not give you a full reward/penalty for OT win/loss?

Even if SC was to stay below us in the NET I don't see how we would get in over them given their SEC record is 13-5 and have 2 wins over us. At this point I think they've proven they are the better team.

[msstate7]

Even if SC was to stay below us in the NET I don't see how we would get in over them given their SEC record is 13-5 and have 2 wins over us. At this point I think they've proven they are the better team.

They're like a 5-seed. They aren't in any jeopardy

[klong-dog]

Even if SC was to stay below us in the NET I don't see how we would get in over them given their SEC record is 13-5 and have 2 wins over us. At this point I think they've proven they are the better team.

lol wutttt

[PGHBulldogBG]

South Carolina is an example of a team where the computers failed miserably. I really do not understand how their NET is so bad when they are 13-5 in SEC play and 25-6 overall. While I do believe UK, Bama and Auburn are better teams, they are not nearly as much better as the computer is saying. Their only non conference loss was @Clemson who is a solid tournament team. There definitely needs to be some tweaks in how NET is reviewed

[Joebob]

South Carolina is an example of a team where the computers failed miserably. I really do not understand how their NET is so bad when they are 13-5 in SEC play and 25-6 overall. While I do believe UK, Bama and Auburn are better teams, they are not nearly as much better as the computer is saying. Their only non conference loss was @Clemson who is a solid tournament team. There definitely needs to be some tweaks in how NET is reviewed

Yeah, it's kind of shocking to see SC ranked below us. Something is wrong somewhere.

[msstate7]

South Carolina is an example of a team where the computers failed miserably. I really do not understand how their NET is so bad when they are 13-5 in SEC play and 25-6 overall. While I do believe UK, Bama and Auburn are better teams, they are not nearly as much better as the computer is saying. Their only non conference loss was @Clemson who is a solid tournament team. There definitely needs to be some tweaks in how NET is reviewed

NET penalizes them for playing no one in the OOC

[StarkVegasSteve]

South Carolina is an example of a team where the computers failed miserably. I really do not understand how their NET is so bad when they are 13-5 in SEC play and 25-6 overall. While I do believe UK, Bama and Auburn are better teams, they are not nearly as much better as the computer is saying. Their only non conference loss was @Clemson who is a solid tournament team. There definitely needs to be some tweaks in how NET is reviewed

Their best non con win is Grand Canyon, a good win. They also beat a decent Va Tech team on a neutral floor. Both those teams are in the 50s in the NET. Their next best non con win was against NET 178 Elon. They also 5 non con wins that are 300+ in the NET. So while you are right that the computers do not tell the story on them, their NET is correct.

[calidawg]

Yeah, it's kind of shocking to see SC ranked below us. Something is wrong somewhere.

There isn't anything wrong. We were favored by nearly 6 points against SC at home. Vegas and NET say we are better. Jans got outcoached period

[StarkVegasSteve]

There isn't anything wrong. We were favored by nearly 6 points against SC at home. Vegas and NET say we are better. Jans got outcoached period

We got out toughed more than Jans got out coached. When your damn near 7 foot post player is getting bullied by guys who are 3 to 4 inches shorter than him, we have a problem.

[confucius say]

There isn't anything wrong. We were favored by nearly 6 points against SC at home. Vegas and NET say we are better. Jans got outcoached period

What did he do or not do to get outcoached?

[parabrave]

We got out toughed more than Jans got out coached. When your damn near 7 foot post player is getting bullied by guys who are 3 to 4 inches shorter than him, we have a problem.

This. And it happened since the Aubbie game. Plus Shak all but disappeared. He would've done better to start JB the last 3 games,

[StarkVegasSteve]

This. And it happened since the Aubbie game. Plus Shak all but disappeared. He would've done better to start JB the last 3 games,

Yea I have no clue what is going on with Shak. It is just strange. He all of a sudden just is not looking for a shot. Playing like he is Matthews on offense, without driving to the goal.

[Commercecomet24]

We got out toughed more than Jans got out coached. When your damn near 7 foot post player is getting bullied by guys who are 3 to 4 inches shorter than him, we have a problem.

I agree, although I think Tolu injury hampered more than we know. He looked a step slow the last 3 games and just didn't seem quick or explosive at all as he had earlier in the year and we had to help more on defense because of that which left to many shooters open on the perimiter.