Last week we had a 9% chance of making the tournament. Beating A&M raised it to 22%.
https://www.teamrankings.com/ncaa-ba...s/bracketology
Printable View
Last week we had a 9% chance of making the tournament. Beating A&M raised it to 22%.
https://www.teamrankings.com/ncaa-ba...s/bracketology
I suppose we pull for these teams Saturday?
Bama over ark (played bama 2 times)
Auburn over Florida
Mizzou over Kentucky
LSU over Georgia (LSU still road game on schedule)
aTm vs vandy?
This correct?
Anyone have a national pull for list?
I don't. Vandy is a bad loss no matter what they do. The better TAMU looks the better we look. At this point we need to be pulling for things in our favor and quality wins over quality opponents will do that.
Vandy won't get an RPI under 100, but if TAMU could stay in the 20s that would really be a feather in our cap come resume comparison time.
No. We need Tennessee to be a strong win.
I think people on this board don't understand what looks good to the committee. A bunch of above average wins isn't impressive. Do we want a win over a Top 20 RPI team, or to make our loss against Ole Miss go from a loss to a 100 RPI team to a loss to a 90 RPI team?
At this point you need things in your favor. Ole Miss loss is going to look not so great no matter what we do. So if they beat Tennessee, Tennessee may drop above 20 in the RPI. Why would we want that? We want Tennessee to be a Top 20 RPI win. If they lose to us and Ole Miss, they won't be that.
We need to be thinking about what's best for us. Ole Miss and Vandy aren't good. Those losses look bad no matter what happens. We want our wins to look as good as possible at this point because no matter what Ole Miss and Vandy do, those will be bad losses.
A win against UT is a Q1 win regardless of what they do against Ole Miss, right? They would have to drop out of the top 50. Isn't that the threshold?
You also completely ignored my post about finishing 2nd in the SEC. You can say that's not important, but that just doesn't make sense.
Top 30 at home is Q1
If we win out and grab one in the tournament we are in no matter what TAMU does. And we aren't sure that TAMU is the spot to take. We should want Florida out. I want my wins over tournament teams. That makes us look better. The committee looks for reasons why you want a team in. Having solid wins over Bama, TAMU, Mizzou, Arkansas, and hopefully Tennessee is a big feather in our cap. That would be 5 wins over NCAA Tournament teams.
That's pretty solid for a bubble team. We didn't beat up on the bottom of the league. We will have taken some wins from some NCAA Tournament teams.
That's not how this works. The SEC doesn't have a set number of spots and they're just switching conference teams in and out.
@A&M is our best win of the year. We do not want that to become anything lesser than it is right now. Good wins are far more important for us than any 'spot' in the SEC or any marginal improvement in Vandy's RPI.
A&M continuing to lose could remove them as a bubble team, regardless of conference. The less bubble teams we have to compete with, the better. Like I said, it's a catch 22 because you want A&M to win to help RPI, but you also want the bubble to weaken. There are two sides.
Also, if we win out, we will probably at least have one more better win than the A&M one.