Let's say that, hypothetically, Freeze gets a one year show cause.
Based on the way the NOA response was worded and the administration's actions to date, I would fully expect that OM would probably just go with an interim guy (Werner maybe) for a year before bringing Freeze right back for the following season. The way Bjork and the Chancellor have handled this up to this point is a full "all-in" mentality. NCAA alleged multiple infractions against two current assistants in Harris and Kiffin, and they aren't even being suspended for games (let alone being fired). And that's not even mentioning Farrar and Miller who were arranging payments to Tunsil and OM has admitted as such by indicating the texts were real. No firings there, either.
Compare this to how we handled the Mirando situation, where he was fired just because he knew about violations that occurred even though he wasn't directly involved (allegedly). The way that OM is approaching this situation especially with their BS self imposed penalties is pretty much the equivalent of pissing on the NCAA's doorstep. We'll see how the NCAA responds.
He's not going to get a show cause. Ain't gonna happen. Some of his henchmen
might but Hugh Freeze is not going to get one. The NCAA doesn't have the balls to do it. Wait and see.
Do I think there's enough there, heck yes. However, I'm only skeptical because I
know how rabid that bunch is and they'll go to no ends to protect him including payoffs, hush money, etc. and we all know the NCAA is not squeaky clean. That's my apprehension.
Yeah but if that occured they wouldn't be considered a "repeate offender"......