Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
Agree, I don't usually have an issue with recruiting sites on who is a 5 star.
My biggest frustration with recruiting sites is the difference between the 88 rated 3 star & the 91 rated 4 star. There is virtually no difference between these two players, yet one player is considered a difference maker (4 Star, national recruit) & the other is seen as left over, chopped liver.
This is where I think recruiting websites are ridiculous.
For example: Yesterday Ole Miss got a commitment from an Allen HS (TX) DB that is 5'11 180 & listed as a 3 star on 247 & 4 star composite. Yet MSU has a 6'2" 170 DB from Louisiana committed name Cam Dantzler, who is from St Thomas Aquinas, is rated an 88 on 247, & some people are comparing him to Richard Sherman.
Something doesn't add up here. Ole Miss gets a similar to less player & gets praised from winning a "national recruit", yet MSU gets a guy that some are comparing to Richard Sherman yet gets no credit.