Printable View
When Ron Polk went to UGA, they had around 750 season ticket holders. That is insane since not only were they in the SEC's most populated state but had also won a National Title in 1990. MSU fans not only love our team but the fans know baseball and appreciate the sport. You just look at the Missouri pitcher that came off the field to a standing ovation for his great performance.Quote:
Originally Posted by BB30
Wishful thinking. It would hurt Ole Miss, but hurt us too. We recruit a lot, players AND students, in Memphis. We don't need more competition.
If the Big 12 adds Houston, I would be surprised. Houston adds nothing but a decent program to the conference. It almost has zero affect on TV. Memphis actually would be better for the conference itself. The Big 12 doesn't need another team from Texas. BYU and maybe Boise St might be the overall best choices.
I would prefer Memphis not get in because it would negatively affect MSU but it would be a great thing for the city of Memphis.
You are correct. Texas considers itself too academically high-minded to join the SEC (but continues to live in the Big XII after two of the better academic programs left). The other reply to your post is correct about A&M not wanting to go back to being little brother within their own conference.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Lambert
Memphis to the Big 12 would just mean the Big 12 is one step closer to folding and having their name programs flock to better conferences. Memphis is not part of a legitimate long-term conference expansion. I've been hearing that FedEx is going to get Memphis into the Big East or Big 12 for over a decade now. Maybe it happens now, but that's pretty much a clear sign the Big 12 has no intention of being a major conference for much longer into the future.
Houston's program and facilities are on the rise, but no one in the Big XII wants Cougar High. Unless the UH gets some push from their state legislature or the Longhorns leave for another conference and UH fills their spot, Houston will not join the Big XII. They bring neither new TV viewers nor new recruiting territory.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taog Redloh
Going west makes some sense for football, less so for the other sports.
The Big XII whiffed when they picked West Virginia instead of going with OU President Boren's choice of Louisville, which has turned out to be a pretty strong athletics program in the big sports. If they had added Louisville, coming back and adding Cincinnati and either BYU or Memphis to get back to 12 would've made more sense than trying to have a league that stretches from Morgantown, West Virginia to Provo, UT.
Having said that, I can't imagine the rest of the Big XII wants to deal with both Texas and BYU, two programs that appear to consider themselves to be more special than everyone else, at the same time.
West Virginia should've gone to the ACC. They could realign divisions so that almost the entire original Big East could be in one division and the traditional ACC+Florida State could be in the other.
I was wearing a thick cotton Famous Maroon Band uniform that day. Thanks for reminding me.***Quote:
Originally Posted by QuadrupleOption
I tend to agree. People love to think that the conference makes the teams....but it's the exact opposite. Teams make the conference. The conference doesn't have power without the teams in it AND....a good revenue sharing model. At the end of the day, a program is no better than it's individual support from its own fanbase. Fedex worries me a little though, can't lie. But I still don't think they have the sheer numbers needed.Quote:
Originally Posted by ckDOG
I know you TX folks like to feel some superiority, but Houston is the best program available for expansion. I know TV eyes is the determining factor, but that doesn't mean the determining factor is correct. Ask the B1G if Rutgers and Maryland were really worth it. You need quantity AND quality. I'd value quality over quantity too, honestly. Houston has more tradition and a bigger fanbase than the others except maybe BYU. Fitting in with the conference also matters, which brings me to this:Quote:
Originally Posted by AusTexDawg
It absolutely makes the most sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by AusTexDawg
I agree with most of this, except I would not have added Louisville either. Neither they nor West Virginia fit. The Big 12 had a great conference when it had Nebraska, Missouri and Texas A&M. Arkansas fits in better out there too. Unfortunately for them they couldn't get the revenue right. Now, picking up the pieces, the solution is to only go west and tap into the next frontier of fans. The population is booming out there. I would look for BYU and Boise State after Houston. Colorado State and/or New Mexico isn't a bad option either. You add whole states AND up/coming schools.Quote:
Originally Posted by AusTexDawg
First of all, I'm from Mississippi, I just live in Texas. I do appreciate you not referring to me as a Texan, though. :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by Taog Redloh
I agree that Houston is the best program available, but since Texas is leading Tech and TCU around by the nose in this process, I don't think this trio sees elevating Houston as being in their best interest (even if that's a false assumption on their part).
Louisville doesn't fit culturally or geographically in the Big XII, but at the time of the last expansion, they were the best overall program left on the board that didn't require the special arrangements made for Notre Dame.
I think that from a common sense standpoint, Colorado State makes sense since they've actually been a better football program than CU was for most its last decade in the Big XII and the location is right. New Mexico would be interesting as it is actually closer to Tech than Austin and half of the other Big XII schools. I have no idea what the TV market looks like, but I've never really seen any sportswriter or university president put UNMw in the expansion discussion.
Since we're at the point where schools such as Cincinnati or Boise State are being discussed for the Big XII, I almost wish the SEC had traded Arkansas and a player to be named later for A&M and called it a day.
Yes, I know my opinions aren't popular but I like to pretend that my outside-the-box ideas are valid. I don't like to go along with the sheep trend because simply put, once it becomes a trend.....it's too late. The time to establish TV viewers was BEFORE conference realignment, not after. And I'm willing to bet that the next round of alignment will be based on QUALITY matchups ie entertainment, not TV eyes. Thus, the route I would take as a commissioner would be going after the highest quality available that ALL eyes within the conference would rather see. I personally think more people would watch Texas vs. Houston than Texas vs. West Virginia. JMHO.Quote:
Originally Posted by AusTexDawg
Ultimately owning the state of Texas could do wonders for the Big 12. And as the population increases out west, I would not be surprised to see more sustained programs from the likes of Boise State, Nevada, and New Mexico among others. BYU is already big enough.
^Good series of posts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taog Redloh
To your point, I've been surprised that Nevada and/or UNLV haven't come up much in previous expansion discussions in the media simply because of the size and recently historic growth rate of Las Vegas/Clark County, NV. Maybe it's the association with <gasp> gambling, but it doesn't make sense with the expansion of casinos and lotteries across nationwide. Nevada had a very entertaining football program a few years ago.
I think a big point of emphasis is not just who is good NOW, but who WILL be good (or have the potential to be good) 10 years from now. I may be overestimating some of those western schools, but I bet in about 20 years some of them will have risen. Just my off-the-wall prediction. I mean, people saw Utah as a mid-major until they got good and the Pac-12 gave them a shot. Boise is in the same mold but I think they've been passed over since they aren't Big State U.Quote:
Originally Posted by AusTexDawg
Conference realignment has done away with some geographical commonality. They ought to think about renaming some of the big conferences, instead of trying to rebrand them. Which is futile for the Big 12.Quote:
Originally Posted by Howboutdemdogs