Printable View
9:40 Second quarter
Hurts scrambles towards our bench, Ridley turns and goes deep.
As he turns, he unforced went out of bounds, came back in, and catches a deep ball down to the one.
Ref throws his hat down.
No flag. Nothing. No review.
Obviously illegal touching. That has to be called. The damn hat is on the field. No review. WTF SEC refs.
Yeah, was watching that at the Atlanta Alum Association bar and we were all screaming about that.
Yes, it was obvious.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord McBuckethead
He was forced out by a defender- so I believe according to the rule- once he establishes himself back in bounds- he is good to go
That's is what the officials determined, but it's incorrect. He was not forced out. Pretty clear when you go back and look at it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
This. But WAS he forced out? Someone said he ran out on his own which is why our defender loosened up. I don’t know though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
He clearly wasn't even touched...
https://twitter.com/twitter/statuses/929529073063399424
That is true however if you watch the replay he ran around the defenderQuote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
No one touched him. He was running back yard routes like the other illegal touchingQuote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
He did run out of bounds we got screwed right there but that is awful technique by Peters on that play
https://twitter.com/ScoutSteveR/stat...37916628250624
He was not forced out. Not even remotely close. Peters lets him go after he watches him run out of bounds.
I agree. Peters never touched him. Riddley tried and succeeded faking him out, but he ran out of bounds doing that. Obvious missed call. Should have been a penalty against Alabama.
No he wasn't. Based on the replay I've watched about 4 or 5 times there doesn't seem to be any contact between Ridley and Peters. Ridley pivoted around toward the sideline to go deep when he saw Hurts rolling out and took himself out of bounds.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
My question is here we are 9 years after the Houston non-review debacle and we still have a play like that that happens on our sideline and we can't demand a review?Quote:
Originally Posted by RiverCityDawg
I didnt see if he was or wasn't- was just going by the call
No doubt on replay we let up on him once he took himself out of bounds.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawgology
Pretty sure whether he was forced out or not us judgement callQuote:
Originally Posted by maroonmania
Is that not a reviewable call?Quote:
Originally Posted by msstate7
I?m not sure... if it is a judgement call, probably not. Again though, not sureQuote:
Originally Posted by maroonmania
If Peters forced him out his nickname should be Yoda because he has to be a Jedi master and made him go out of bounds with the force.
It is a judgement call so not reviewable, but I have no idea how you see that he went out of bounds (which the official obviously did given that he threw his hat down) and somehow your eyes tell you he was contacted and forced out when it wasn't even close. Looking back it's got to be one of the worst calls I've ever seen.
Well if a call like that is strictly left up to the discretion of the refs with no chance for review is there really any surprise how the call went given who we were playing?Quote:
Originally Posted by thf24